Article

2012-06-12 India-Pakistan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2012-06-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11127 views ] Top
File under: Govt of Pakistan

#1 Reading their comments with rating (+-) is interesting. Seems like a lot of Dawn reading folks get it. Likely the ISI doesn't care and should be lumped in with Hak...

Posted by Water Modem 2012-06-12 03:03|| 2012-06-12 03:03|| Front Page Top

#2 The Pak military wants an anti Nato/US/Indian Western border for their own security/paranoia hence supporting the Taliban and Haqqani clan.

Posted by Fester Clunter7205 2012-06-12 03:16|| 2012-06-12 03:16|| Front Page Top

#3 Seriously, we withheld some small % of funds, but what is the rest of the money we send to them used for?

Posted by Vespasian Prince of the Geats3632 2012-06-12 05:31|| 2012-06-12 05:31|| Front Page Top

#4 Supporting politicians and buying guns and ammunition.

Posted by Fred 2012-06-12 09:24|| 2012-06-12 09:24|| Front Page Top

#5 The monies were for ensuring their Nukes don't end up in the wrong hands and allowing US to monitor them.

Posted by newc 2012-06-12 10:36|| 2012-06-12 10:36|| Front Page Top

#6 The outgoing US ambassador to Pakistain Cameron Munter had the right approach: don't expect miracles; keep expectations and demands firmly in check; and work with Pakistain to find the spaces in which incremental progress can be made

Such an approach is great for the striped-pants set or the Commerce Department.

Not such a good thing when one is trying to not lose a war.

Posted by Pappy 2012-06-12 12:06|| 2012-06-12 12:06|| Front Page Top

#7 What makes you think Bambi's administration is trying not to lose, Pappy?

Posted by Barbara 2012-06-12 18:18|| 2012-06-12 18:18|| Front Page Top

#8 There is a difference between trying to win and trying not to lose. The latter is generally a political maneuver where one disengages, while hopefully, or lately, supposedly leaving the political entity one had been supporting in a position to take care of itself.

It almost worked in Vietnam. It's a toss-up leaning toward failure in Iraq. It looks akin to failure in Afghanistan.

Another thing about trying not to lose: the fallout is generally years down the road; the culprits are politically safe by then.

Posted by Pappy 2012-06-12 22:09|| 2012-06-12 22:09|| Front Page Top

00:12 JosephMendiola
23:42 JosephMendiola
23:35 newc
23:30 JosephMendiola
23:29 newc
23:16 JosephMendiola
22:55 Charles
22:47 gorb
22:44 gorb
22:09 Pappy
22:08 Steve White
21:48 Fat Bob Unotch3711
21:40 SR-71
21:07 JosephMendiola
21:02 JosephMendiola
20:51 Crusogum Unolugum5526
20:51 Frank G
20:48 AlanC
20:44 JosephMendiola
20:29 JosephMendiola
20:26 lotp
20:22 badanov
20:15 Procopius2k
20:13 Matt