Article

2004-05-12 Home Front: Culture Wars

ACLU Helps Restore Biblical Verse to High School Yearbook

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Mike 2004-05-12 1:18:55 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 The ACLU is not against religion, at least not formally.

The ACLU is against anything threatening "the separation of church and state" (words that are not part of the 1st Amendment). Many American religious believers read those words as an attack on religion, especially Christianity.

In this case, the yearbook's printing of the student's quotation from the Bible is not against "the separation of church and state." The reason is that apparently every student had a chance to include some words of their own in the yearbook. Hence, the government created a "public forum." In a public forum, the 1st Amendment's freedom of speech clause applies. The 1st Amendment certainly covers religious expressions, including a quotation from the Bible. Therefore, not only would the ACLU consider the inclusion of her quotation allowable by the government, the ACLU considers it mandatory. And indeed, although I ain't no lawyer, I believe the law agrees with the ACLU as to that conclusion.

Of course, religious conservatives would bypass that argument. As the Rantburg "highlight writer" would say, religious expressions should always be protected, including when they are made by the government.

In short, the ACLU and the conservative position here agree. Unfortunately, conservatives typically do not want to "hear" the ACLU position, and thus are surprised to learn whenever the ACLU is not diametrically opposed to them. The ACLU does have significant differences with the conservative view, but it is not diametrically opposed.

Posted by Old Guy 2004-05-12 3:39:56 PM|| 2004-05-12 3:39:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 OG: I'd agree with you, and the ACLU, that this was not a case of government endorsement of religion, and that the Constitution clearly protected the student's comment.

However, one often finds the ACLU opposing what should be protected speech, usually in situations where the speech they oppose is also opposed by elite liberal opinion (e.g., peaceful protest outside abortion clinics).

I'm glad to see the ACLU live up to its principles here--just wish they'd do it more often.

(Besides, the pigs-fly hell-freezes-over Murat-endorses-W combination was too good to pass up.)

Posted by Mike 2004-05-12 4:00:49 PM|| 2004-05-12 4:00:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 I agree with you.

Posted by Old Guy 2004-05-12 5:36:22 PM|| 2004-05-12 5:36:22 PM|| Front Page Top

04:09 yorgos
00:33 Lucky
00:20 Lucky
23:58 Long Hair Republican
23:57 Barbara Skolaut
23:56 badanov
23:49 Seafarious
23:33 Barbara Skolaut
23:25 Barbara Skolaut
23:24 Barbara Skolaut
23:19 Mr. Davis
23:19 cheaderhead
23:19 Barbara Skolaut
23:18 Mr. Davis
23:12 Phil Fraering
23:10 B
23:09 Atomic Conspiracy
23:07 Anonymoose
23:00 B
23:00 Atomic Conspiracies
22:56 badanov
22:55 Anonymous4809
22:52 Classical_Liberal
22:48 Steve White