Article

2005-05-16 Europe

French EU referendum polls put 'non' camp ahead at 54%

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2005-05-16 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11127 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 LeMonde is Le Chirac's private mouthpiece. Any poll they took is by definition crooked like Chirac.

Posted by 3dc 2005-05-16 00:18|| 2005-05-16 00:18|| Front Page Top

#2 Will there be UN observers?

Posted by someone 2005-05-16 01:38|| 2005-05-16 01:38|| Front Page Top

#3 Nope. Le Monde is not Chirac's private mouthpiece. It has ever been critical of him. In fact most of its journalists hate him. In am mock vote before the 2002 French presidential elections 50 % of its journalists voted for one of the two trotskits candidates (ie more radical then the communists). However Le Monde's party line has ever been strongly pro-EU and Le Monde has consitently tried to manipulate the opinion toward pro-UE feelings (diabolization of the USA, torpedoing of any politician critical of the EU, distortion ofb the news when they reflected poorly of the EU).

Le Monde has enormous influence on the French media resulting in politicians molding their positions to please Le Monde. Americans, ever think in an independent press as non-state owned but in France what we lack is notr apress independent of the state but a state independent of the press: the lack of counterweights to Le Monde and its ilk has politicians trying to please Le Monde more than to please the elector.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-05-16 02:24|| 2005-05-16 02:24|| Front Page Top

#4 Thanks, JFM, good post, wish you had a voice in the US media.

Posted by anon and want to stay that way 2005-05-16 02:47|| 2005-05-16 02:47|| Front Page Top

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-05-16 05:29|| 2005-05-16 05:29|| Front Page Top

#6 In 2000, the then prime Minister Lionel Jospin didn't hesitate to alienate its own electoral base, ruffle feathers in the socialist party, lose a crucial ally (the one who gave him credibility about fighting crime, an important concern of the electorate), and betray his own ideas in order to get "Le Monde"'s support for the presidential campaign.

End result was that trhe crucial ally ran against him and deprived Jospin of enough votes for Jospin coming behind Le Pen and thus not being in the second round of the Presidential election. He retired, sort of, from politics but had he had some sense of honor he would have written a poem, drunk a cup of sake and performed sepuku. I would gladly have helped him with the poem. :-)

Anyway that story is a proime example of the French state bowing to the wbhims of the French MSM. In many ways France's problem is the state not being independent of the press.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-05-16 05:40|| 2005-05-16 05:40|| Front Page Top

#7 JFM

Can't wait for France to have a Le Renard TV station.

Posted by mhw 2005-05-16 07:51|| 2005-05-16 07:51|| Front Page Top

#8 Btw, Fox News was shown on sat tv, by the two main broadcasters; I used to frequently watch it, found it very lively and interesting.
Alas, some time before OIF, first "Canalsat", the offspring of the *left-leaning* "Canal+", ceased its broadcasting, followed a bit later by its rival "Tps". Now, FN, which is demonized as the "evil neo-con/Bushitleretardedictator's channel, isn't available anymore... but, of course, "Al Jezzera", "Al arabya" and co are... I've written to FN, and they kindly responded, saying that presently no french distributor was interested in rebroadcasting it. Draw your own conclusions.

Posted by Anonymous5089 2005-05-16 08:12|| 2005-05-16 08:12|| Front Page Top

#9 I read Le Monde on-line now and then and if I could write as well as JFM I would have said exactly the same thing.

Posted by SwissTex 2005-05-16 09:09|| 2005-05-16 09:09|| Front Page Top

#10 Le Monde is the statist pro-EU newspaper in France; In short the Socialist Pro-EU wing. Le Figaro is the right newspaper pro-EU too, lightly pro-Chirac since the Franch right is only glued because Chirac is in power. Chirac/Sarkozy is the what devides the right.

Posted by Hupomoque Spoluter7949 2005-05-16 11:24|| 2005-05-16 11:24|| Front Page Top

#11 From the three French papers who matter (there are more outside Paris, but they mostly report about who won the beauty contest in Trou Perdu and have about zero national or international politics coverage, at best they relay AFP) "Le Figaro" is the only one who has some europsceptical or american-friendly articles. Don't dream they are not the majority, but at least, unlike the other two "Le Figaro" is not monolithically pro-EU and anti-american. Jean FranÃ§ois Revel (PBUH) :-) wrote in Le Figaro until recently.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-05-16 11:52|| 2005-05-16 11:52|| Front Page Top

#12 [Jospin] retired, sort of, from politics but had he had some sense of honor he would have written a poem, drunk a cup of sake and performed sepuku. I would gladly have helped him with the poem.

So . . . I take it you don't like this guy, eh?

Posted by Mike">Mike 2005-05-16 12:33|| 2005-05-16 12:33|| Front Page Top

#13 I seem to remember reading that last time they had a tight vote on a major EU issue, the government just stuffed the ballot boxes with phony votes from Tahiti, Moorea, French Guyana, and a bunch of other former colonial possessions whose citizens are apparently still allowed to vote in French elections. It wouldn't surprise me if Chirac did the same thing again.

Posted by Captain Pedantic 2005-05-16 13:02|| 2005-05-16 13:02|| Front Page Top

#14 Mike

On the contrary I love him so much that I would have helped him with the poem, paid the sake from my own pocket and then given him the coup de grace to avoid him suffering. :-)

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-05-16 15:17|| 2005-05-16 15:17|| Front Page Top

#15 Captain Pedantic:

Technically Guyanne, Martinique and Guadeloupe are full French "departements" like any others and their citizens fully fledged French citizens (ie like Hawains and Alaskans but unlike Puerto Ricans) so they have the right to vote.

However, those territories are very dependant on subsidies from the French tax payer and have banana Republic-like levels of clientelism. Their massive voting in favor of the Maastricht treaty was decisive in its adoption.

Another vote who massively voted for Maastricht was Alsace. It is there where the EU parliament is located. Since two times a month the parliament travels between Brussels and Strasbourg at enormous cost for the tax payer and inconvenience for the euro-deputies, the plan was to move the Parliament to Brussels. But when the "No" looked like it could win the plan was shelved. Since the Parliament means jobs and money for the region, Alsacians voted for Maastricht at over 70%, and still more for the Bas-Rhin (ie the department whose capital is Strasbourg).

As you see, the pro-EU people have a very peculiar respect for democracy and cleanness of elections.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-05-16 17:03|| 2005-05-16 17:03|| Front Page Top

#16 Maybe Fred could put up a 'Non' and 'Oui' pool, so that we can place bets. Nearest guess wins. Quatloos only, want to keep it legal. I'll be the first to stick my neck out and say 'Non' by 54.5% for 10 Quatloos. Any takers?

Posted by Anonymoose 2005-05-16 17:04|| 2005-05-16 17:04|| Front Page Top

#17 JFM, in the end the vote is in the tank, isn't it? At the last minute won't someone just yell, "hate Bush," and 90% of the French will approve the constitution?

Posted by Super Hose 2005-05-16 21:09|| 2005-05-16 21:09|| Front Page Top

00:06 trailing wife
00:01 Anonymoose
23:59 trailing wife
23:57 badanov
23:57 docob
23:56 Al Bundy
23:42 docob
23:41 trailing wife
23:40 .com
23:40 docob
23:34 .com
23:34 JosephMendiola
23:34 .com
23:32 Silentbrick
23:30 .com
23:26 docob
23:23 Atomic Conspiracy
23:23 John in Tokyo
23:20 Cluse Jiting2689
23:18 trailing wife
23:16 trailing wife
23:15 docob
23:12 trailing wife
23:07 Anonymoose