Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/10/2013 View Thu 05/09/2013 View Wed 05/08/2013 View Tue 05/07/2013 View Mon 05/06/2013 View Sun 05/05/2013 View Sat 05/04/2013
1
2013-05-10 Home Front: WoT
BBC Editor Claims ‘Heads Will Roll’ Over Benghazi
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2013-05-10 12:47|| || Front Page|| [11129 views ]  Top

#1 BBC Editor Claims 'Heads Will Roll' Over Benghazi

How Islamic of them.
Posted by Procopius2k 2013-05-10 13:08||   2013-05-10 13:08|| Front Page Top

#2 

... just makes my head hurt. good lord. he didn't even know what black friday means.
Posted by Chock Ebburt4695 2013-05-10 13:41||   2013-05-10 13:41|| Front Page Top

#3 Watch Live: White House Addresses Memo Requests on Benghazi Attacks
Posted by tipper 2013-05-10 14:23||   2013-05-10 14:23|| Front Page Top

#4 I'm sure the white house is looking for someone to pin it on. Hopefully a volunteer. Until then they'll probably smear the whistleblowers.
Posted by rjschwarz 2013-05-10 15:13||   2013-05-10 15:13|| Front Page Top

#5  "You'll take the blame. Cutter and Ritter will take some, too, but it won't amount to much...The rest of the blame will fall on Greer. Oh yeah, you'll take him down with you, you'll destroy his reputation, but that's as far as it'll go. The old Potomac two-step, Jack."
Posted by European Conservative 2013-05-10 15:28||   2013-05-10 15:28|| Front Page Top

#6 I predict that nothing will happen of significance. Maybe some low level State Department functionary will get blamed, or maybe somebody in CIA or Defense. Hilary and Obama will suffer no lasting damage.

By 2016, people will have forgotten where Benghazi is or why it is significant. The Republicans won't have the balls to bring it up -after all, in 2016, it will be a long time ago, just water under the bridge.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2013-05-10 18:41||   2013-05-10 18:41|| Front Page Top

#7 Again, the Democrat-controlled US Senate are unilikely to abandon + remove POTUS Bammer from the Oval Office/WH over Benghazi unless intentional murder is conclusively proven.

EXCLUDING ANY DIRECT FELONY LINKS TO THE VARIOUS "FAST-N-FURIOUS" ALLEGATIONS/SCENARIOS, THE ALTERN WOULD BE AKIN TO FELONY-LEVEL MANSLAUGHTER.

As things stand, those whom seek to impeach the Bammer have a very weak "derelection of duty/responsibility" case, one that IMO does NOT defeat the Bammer's counter-argument of Benghazi being a simple or tragic "mistake in judgement/conclusion" by the Bammer + Admin. IFF ANYTHING, THE BUCK ENDS AT SECSTATE HILLARY, NOT THE BAMMER???

My $$$ is on CHINA-VS-JAPAN-VS-DEBT/SEQUESTER-RIDDEN-US, to include any China, China Ally-led major mil incidents on the mainland.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-05-10 23:48||   2013-05-10 23:48|| Front Page Top

#8 SOMEBODY'S head will roll, NOT OBAMA or Hillary's.

I'd be damned surprised.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-05-10 23:59||   2013-05-10 23:59|| Front Page Top

23:59 Redneck Jim
23:55 Redneck Jim
23:48 Dopey Craimp8068
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:35 JosephMendiola
23:01 JosephMendiola
23:00 Alaska Paul
22:58 Alaska Paul
22:54 Alaska Paul
22:52 Alaska Paul
22:51 JosephMendiola
22:34 JosephMendiola
20:47 Alaska Paul
20:45 Alaska Paul
20:43 Alaska Paul
20:43 chris
20:39 Alaska Paul
19:31 JosephMendiola
19:22 Barbara
19:22 ryuge
19:02 Besoeker
18:41 Bobby
18:41 Pappy
18:41 Rambler in Virginia









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com