Article

2004-03-15 Home Front: Politix

What did Kerry know before 9/11.... seems, a lot about Logan....

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Sherry 2004-03-15 4:07:37 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 This has to be enough to get this incompetent fool out the way, can't bush put this in one of his campaign ads, after all kerry would if it were the other way around

Posted by Jon Shep U.K 2004-3-15 4:20:09 PM|| 2004-3-15 4:20:09 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 We will see now if there are any true investigative reporters left.

Posted by Bill Nelson 2004-3-15 4:29:21 PM|| 2004-3-15 4:29:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 We will see now if there are any true investigative reporters left.

There's probably a fair amount of them out there still. The problem is, it isn't Democrats they are interested in investigating.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-3-15 4:38:04 PM|| 2004-3-15 4:38:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Rumormongors (such as the democrats employ....) aren't 'Investigative Reporters'.....

Posted by CrazyFool 2004-3-15 5:35:05 PM|| 2004-3-15 5:35:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Yet the warnings apparently did stick in Kerry's mind: In the days after 9/11, Kerry told the Boston Globe that he'd triggered an undercover probe of Logan security by the General Accounting Office in June 2001.

But he wrote Sullivan no such thing in his July letter, stating only that he passed his warning and tape on to Transportation, not GAO. And GAO, though it is the investigative arm of Congress, didn't seem to know what the senator was talking about. The agency had tested security at two airports before 9/11, but neither one was Logan. And Kerry confessed he didn't know the outcome of the probe he says he triggered.

Sounds to me like a vintage Kerry fib.

But one thing puzzles me about this story: Why did these guys go only to Kerry? Or, if they did go to other pols, what was their response?

Posted by wuzzalib 2004-3-15 8:19:02 PM|| 2004-3-15 8:19:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 LOL! I have no idea whether Skeery did what they allege - although these people have more credibility than Skeery, given his reckless disregard for truth thus far in the campaign. The truly funny thing to me is that this is exactly how the Jackass Party operatives work! It should be investigated, it should be done by a bona-fide Congressional Inquiry, and it should be led by a Special Prosecutor who gives juicy sound bytes on the nightly news every day. What's good for the goose...

Time for the Publican Leadership to get on the job and start this ball rolling. 8-)

Posted by .com 2004-3-15 9:14:41 PM|| 2004-3-15 9:14:41 PM|| Front Page Top

14:17 TerrorHunter4Ever
08:24 Raptor
03:33 parallel
01:10 Atomic Conspiracy
23:49 Jarhead
23:39 Lucky
23:39 Jarhead
23:28 Frank Martin
23:26 Frank Martin
23:21 anymouse
23:16 Barbara Skolaut
23:13 Lucky
23:13 .com
22:55 .com
22:38 sc88
22:29 .com
22:27 Lucky
22:20 .com
22:15 Anonymous
22:13 .com
22:12 Lucky
22:10 .com
21:56 Anonymous
21:53 .com