Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 03/12/2021 View Thu 03/11/2021 View Wed 03/10/2021 View Tue 03/09/2021 View Mon 03/08/2021 View Sun 03/07/2021 View Sat 03/06/2021
1
2021-03-12 -PC Follies
Georgetown Law professor caught complaining about black students on Zoom
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2021-03-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 You never hear about a math professor complaining about "African-American" students - I wonder why?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2021-03-12 02:37||   2021-03-12 02:37|| Front Page Top

#2 Any comments from the Georgetown White/Asian Law Students Association?
Posted by Vespasian Ebboting9735 2021-03-12 11:09||   2021-03-12 11:09|| Front Page Top

#3 Know what will solve this? Half dozen movies starring black actors as brave and stunning lawyers. Maybe a Cuba Gooding, Jr. marathon in the meantime.
Posted by swksvolFF 2021-03-12 12:22||   2021-03-12 12:22|| Front Page Top

#4 the truth be rayciss
Posted by Chris 2021-03-12 12:53||   2021-03-12 12:53|| Front Page Top

#5 Years ago, in an agency focused on Criminal Justice policy and resourcing in California, I had long conversations with senior leadership about the assertion of the criminal justice system being inherently racist against "people of color". Their disproportionate incarceration rates were used as proof for the assertion, coupled with some levels of under-representation in the ranks of sworn law enforcement. When I explained that if you dismissed the racial categorizations and instead viewed the offender base by matriarchy, single family households lacking a father, low education levels, unemployment/low-skilled employment, and urban density with gang proximity, you got exactly the proportional representation that existed at the time. But since that answer placed responsibility on the individuals and family choices, it was unacceptable. SO the reasoning had to be racism, because any other answer held other factors accountable and that didn't advance political objects.
Posted by NoMoreBS 2021-03-12 14:18||   2021-03-12 14:18|| Front Page Top

23:57 Omoting Jones5535
20:42 Thaick Darling of the Weak8987
20:31 Frank G
20:15 Clem
20:15 newc
20:12 Clem
20:02 Glimpsing MinsterSayton3625
19:37 Ebbomoger Speaking for Boskone4589
19:11 Dogshat Inacup8292
18:55 Pheth and Company4488
18:43 Mercutio
18:24 Squishy BackdoorTrotsky7770
18:09 badanov
18:07 746
17:55 jpal
17:40 Sheretle Omavigum8810
17:39 Bertie Thramp1337
17:37 jpal
17:10 Beldar B. Hayes4035
17:06 Beldar B. Hayes4035
16:57 SteveS
16:50 JohnQC
16:47 swksvolFF
16:44 JohnQC









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com