Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 02/12/2003 View Tue 02/11/2003 View Mon 02/10/2003 View Sun 02/09/2003 View Sat 02/08/2003 View Fri 02/07/2003 View Thu 02/06/2003
1
2003-02-12 Afghanistan
Musharraf playing game with US, Afghanistan
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred Pruitt 2003-02-12 09:27 am|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Its in Musharraf's best interests to release them, it makes his own islamofacists happy and it allows the US a chance to kill the buggers and remove the problem permenantly. It would be nice if he could put some kind of chemical on the rifle butts that allowed us to spot them quickly though.
Posted by Yank 2003-02-12 10:58:48||   2003-02-12 10:58:48|| Front Page Top

#2 But the question here is, have Perv and the ISI reverted to type and resumed subverting Afghanistan by funding and directing the Talibs, Hek, and any resident al-Qaeda in the NWFP and Balochistan? This article says "yes."

That puts Perv and his boyz - not just the local fundos and Soddy agents - into the position of actively working against our interests. If the Krazed Killer Korps at Spin Boldak traces back to ISI, rather than simply to Qazi and/or Fazl, they're due for a whacking. It's already pretty obvious that they're not indigenous, except by a severe stretch of the term.

Given Pakland's record of being unable to stop meddling in Kashmir, I'd say it's likely. They regard Afghanistan as their sphere of influence. There's lotsa room for Pakland on the Axis of Almost as Evil.
Posted by Fred  2003-02-12 12:28:10||   2003-02-12 12:28:10|| Front Page Top

#3 I saw somewhere, I think in the NY Times, that Moscow is suspected of funnelling $100 million + to Fahim et.al., outside of the auspicious of the new Afghan army. That seems decidedly unhelpful. What's your take on that?
Posted by Sharon 2003-02-12 14:29:31||   2003-02-12 14:29:31|| Front Page Top

#4 I consider Pakistan as an honorary member of the Axis of Evil but like China, I'm willing to let Bush slide for not mentioning them, nukes and all.
Posted by Yank 2003-02-12 17:24:32||   2003-02-12 17:24:32|| Front Page Top

#5 Sharon,

You post an interesting question that's probably too involved to be answered in a simple comment. I haven't seen the article you reference - I checked the NY Times site and couldn't find it. The premise would seem to be contradicted by this article, from EurasiaNet.

That being said, I don't doubt that the Russians are trying to maintain relations with the Northern Alliance members, just as they're trying to achieve influence with the broader-based Karzai regime. Like the Paks and Iran, the Russers regard Afghanistan as within their sphere of influence, which is where a part of Afghanistan's problems come from.

The Russians at this point probably somewhere between a minor problem and a moderate help, depending on what day of the week it is and what Ivanov had for breakfast. I'd also put Iran into the minor problem category, unless they see a real opening.

Pakistan I'd put into the real problem category. You notice that there's no real insurgent activity along the Iran border. What fighting there is comes from the Kandahar-based Pashtuns trying to make inroads into Ismail Khan's fief in Herat. I think Ismail has made the decision to support the Kabul government. He's now sending men to join the national army, and he states here, in an address to a graduating class at his (Herat) military academy, that he regards his forces as a part of the national army. Ismail, remember, wasn't a part of the Northern Alliance - he was allied with it, but an independent force. Similar sentiments apply to the Pandjiris and to Dostum's forces and, to a slightly lesser extent, to the Hazaras - it appears the central government is coming together, albeit slowly, and as it gets stronger they'll provide more support. If it falls apart in the near future, they still haven't put all their eggs into its basket.

Afghanistan's unrest comes from Pashtunistan, but even there, I think most of the Pashtuns are worn out from year after year after year of war and treachery. The arms, the ammunition, the leadership, the pamphlets, the safe havens, are all over the border in Pakistan, where they've been enjoying the benefits of fighting jihad against Kabul, without having to pay a serious price.
Posted by Fred  2003-02-12 18:13:35||   2003-02-12 18:13:35|| Front Page Top

#6 good analysis Fred (as usual {apply sucking-up sounds}...is the answer to apply some consequences to the assh***s that run NWFP and Pervez? Play up the India thang?
Posted by Frank G  2003-02-12 19:39:55||   2003-02-12 19:39:55|| Front Page Top

#7 I've addressed this with more verbiage and maybe more coherence on WOTWeek.
Posted by Fred  2003-02-12 22:51:20||   2003-02-12 22:51:20|| Front Page Top

07:40 liberalhawk
06:14 Ptah
05:22 Mike
05:15 Anonymous
23:07 RW
22:51 Fred
22:35 Hugh Jorgan
22:27 Bomb-a-rama
21:42 RW
21:40 Dishman
21:05 Frank G
20:59 RW
20:53 Jabba the Tutt
20:16 Frank G
20:02 Crescend
19:45 mojo
19:39 Frank G
19:35 mojo
19:19 Dishman
19:10 dakotah
18:49 Patrick Phillips
18:24 Fred
18:21 Patrick Phillips
18:13 Fred









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com