Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 02/05/2020 View Tue 02/04/2020 View Mon 02/03/2020 View Sun 02/02/2020 View Sat 02/01/2020 View Fri 01/31/2020 View Thu 01/30/2020
1
2020-02-05 Government
Years of Warnings, Then Death and Disaster - How the Navy Failed it's Sailors
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-02-05 10:10|| || Front Page|| [11 views ]  Top

#1 In the early 2000s, the Navy embarked on a quest for so-called efficiencies. Vern Clark, the Navy’s top military officer during much of the Bush era, brought an MBA to the job and pitched his cuts to the force using the jargon of corporate downsizing. Smaller crews were “optimal” crews. Relying on new technologies to do the work sailors once did was described as “capital-for-labor substitutions.”

Promising a “workforce for the 21st century,” Clark’s team tried out new training and staffing ideas, including a decision that officers no longer needed to attend months of classroom training to learn the intricacies of operating billion-dollar warships. Instead, aspiring Surface Warfare Officers, charged with everything from driving ships to launching missiles, could learn mostly at sea with the help of packets of CDs. The program was widely derided by sailors as “SWOS in a Box.”

The efficiencies even included eliminating a requirement for ship captains to post lookouts on both sides of ships, a cut that would later prove crucial when the Fitzgerald’s crew failed to see a fast-closing cargo ship until it was too late.
Posted by Frank G 2020-02-05 10:32||   2020-02-05 10:32|| Front Page Top

#2 Warships are often "overmanned" because they expect to take casualties. Some of the equipment is "redundant" because they expect to take battle damage.
You might be able to eliminate some of the "excess" and redundancies IF you expect that you will never go into combat.
On the other hand, eliminating lookouts is just effing stupid. Yes, 99.99& of the time, the lookout will see nothing. However, the 0.01% can literally be the difference between life and death.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2020-02-05 10:50||   2020-02-05 10:50|| Front Page Top

#3 Let's hope JIT Kaizen etc for .Mil isnt here...

Totally wrong for that sector.

Maybe for R+D but not field.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-02-05 11:34||   2020-02-05 11:34|| Front Page Top

#4 US Navy is developing LASERS for submarines that could 'disable drones and blow up small boats'
Posted by Skidmark 2020-02-05 13:34||   2020-02-05 13:34|| Front Page Top

#5 Urban Outfitters' 'vintage' US Navy coveralls draw online outrage
Posted by Skidmark 2020-02-05 14:01||   2020-02-05 14:01|| Front Page Top

23:51 Lex
23:47 Lex
23:40 ruprecht
23:31 Chunky Henbane3303
23:29 Varmint Splat1454
23:27 Varmint Splat1454
23:05 Chunky Henbane3303
22:43 Lex
22:41 Lex
22:37 Abu Uluque
22:32 JohnQC
22:26 JohnQC
22:17 charger
21:39 swksvolFF
21:35 Woodrow
21:34 swksvolFF
21:24 Woodrow
21:12 trailing wife
21:06 Chris
21:01 trailing wife
20:56 trailing wife
20:38 Frank G
20:35 Mike Kozlowski
20:34 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com