Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 01/25/2005 View Mon 01/24/2005 View Sun 01/23/2005 View Sat 01/22/2005 View Fri 01/21/2005 View Thu 01/20/2005 View Wed 01/19/2005
1
2005-01-25 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
US 'will stand alone' in Iran attack
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2005-01-25 10:34:55 PM|| || Front Page|| [8 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Well, I have feeling that Soddies and other Gulf states will be uttering condemnations, but privately the would place big order on candies as they would run out in no time.
Posted by Sobiesky 2005-01-25 10:43:37 PM||   2005-01-25 10:43:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 
The USA is not going to attack Iran.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2005-01-25 10:49:31 PM||   2005-01-25 10:49:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 MALAYSIA, which chairs the world’s biggest grouping of Muslim countries, has warned that the United States will stand alone in the world if it attacks Iran.

That sure simplifies setting up the old command net, doesn't it?
Posted by badanov  2005-01-25 11:09:50 PM|| [http://www.rkka.org/title-boris.gif]  2005-01-25 11:09:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Mike, coulf you elaborate why you think so and what you think would happen when Iran will get their nukes?
Posted by Sobieky 2005-01-25 11:17:38 PM||   2005-01-25 11:17:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 PIMF, typing over my cat in front of my keyboard...
coulf=could.
Posted by Sobieky 2005-01-25 11:18:40 PM||   2005-01-25 11:18:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 MS: The USA is not going to attack Iran.

No invasion, maybe. But I wouldn't be buying any real estate near Iran's nuclear facilities.
Posted by Zhang Fei  2005-01-25 11:22:26 PM|| [http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2005-01-25 11:22:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Header: US ’will stand alone’ in Iran attack

What's as likely is that Iran will stand alone in US attack.
Posted by Zhang Fei  2005-01-25 11:24:03 PM|| [http://timurileng.blogspot.com]  2005-01-25 11:24:03 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Because The UN is good. I love the UN. The UN should be in charge of all governmental power world wide. Then there would be no wars and everyone would be nice. The UN is better than God. I love Kofi too.

Just make the UN in charge of everything. That would be super cool and make me happy.
Posted by Sike Mylwester 2005-01-25 11:24:52 PM||   2005-01-25 11:24:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 I agree with the thoughts of Zhang Fei (#6); The US need not have to invade per se in order to accomplish it's primary objectives of neutralizing the nuclear threat. I would recommend to the president: No boots on the ground (other than CIA, special forces, and or mercenaries)! Hit the 300+ targets, both known and suspected in a first stage wave; wait for reaction and prepare for the second demoralizing hit. Take them back atleast 22 years!
Posted by smn 2005-01-25 11:44:35 PM||   2005-01-25 11:44:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Don't forget to take out Qom and the mad mullahs when you plan it.
Posted by 3dc 2005-01-25 11:53:01 PM||   2005-01-25 11:53:01 PM|| Front Page Top

10:57 nostradamus
10:47 nostradamus
23:58 trailing wife
23:57 trailing wife
23:53 Alaska Paul
23:53 3dc
23:50 Alaska Paul
23:44 Alaska Paul
23:44 smn
23:34 Jame Retief
23:30 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:27 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:24 Sike Mylwester
23:24 Zhang Fei
23:22 Zhang Fei
23:18 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:18 Sobieky
23:17 Sobieky
23:16 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:09 badanov
22:57 Sobieky
22:53 Cat D12
22:49 Mike Sylwester
22:46 Mike Sylwester









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com