Article

2005-01-14 Iraq-Jordan

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2005-01-14 9:17:14 AM|| || Front Page|| [9 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 clap, clap, clap...standing ovation!!

From Islamic terrorists to The New York Times, the enemies of free elections in Iraq
oooh...ouch NYT!

You canât play the intellectualâs game of endless procrastination, sunk in dreams of impossible perfection. There is no substitute for the courage to act. Damn, the man can write.

Posted by 2b 2005-01-14 9:56:00 AM|| 2005-01-14 9:56:00 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 I believe that is almost the Engineer's Creed - you know, the people who get shit done, instead of talk it to death. Somewhere on USS Clueless, is the item I'm referring to - Stephen and Ralph would definitely get along fine, heh.

Posted by .com 2005-01-14 10:04:42 AM|| 2005-01-14 10:04:42 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 The terrorists believe in religious tyranny, while the insurgents believe in secular tyranny. Neither care in the least about the aspirations of the common people. For its part, the Times believes in the tyranny of the intelligentsia. Blinded by its hatred for the Bush administration, it attempts to portray every development in Iraq as a disaster. Even marginally successful Iraqi elections would prove it wrong yet again. Shouldnât we raise an eyebrow when we find Americaâs self-proclaimed "newspaper of record" shoulder-to-shoulder with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and the leftovers of Saddam Husseinâs regime?

This just about says it all with regards to the NYTs. Their credibility is absolutely zip, nada, zero. MSM again. The NYTs and Dan Blather are self-appointed intellectual smart asses with an agenda that says they know what is best for the rest of us. They have not seen the truth in years.

Posted by John Q. Citizen 2005-01-14 10:39:59 AM|| 2005-01-14 10:39:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 American critics of the elections lately have shifted to complaints that the Sunni Arabs may not be adequately represented in the voting. In other words, if less than 20 percent of potential voters choose not to participate it negates the electionâs validity.

Haaahahahahahaaahahaaa......

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2005-01-14 4:14:28 PM|| 2005-01-14 4:14:28 PM|| Front Page Top

23:58 Barbara Skolaut
23:56 Frank G
23:55 Frank G
23:54 Frank G
23:51 Atomic Conspiracy
23:51 Barry Bonds
23:47 Dishman
23:39 Aris Katsaris
23:36 Angash Elminelet3775
23:35 Alaska Paul
23:33 Aris Katsaris
23:33 lex
23:24 Atomic Conspiracy
23:16 Anonymoose
23:11 Karl Rove
23:09 Dishman
23:09 lex
22:59 Atomic Conspiracy
22:54 SwissTex
22:50 Captain America
22:48 lex
22:47 Frank G
22:46 anon
22:44 Frank G