Article

2023-01-17 -Great Cultural Revolution

[4] Houston activists call for arrest of armed taqueria diner who shot, killed robbery suspect

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Skidmark 2023-01-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11133 views ] Top

#1 A.K.A New Black Panthers

Posted by Mad Eye Omeretch7959 2023-01-17 01:00|| 2023-01-17 01:00|| Front Page Top

#2 That's how you rub someone out.

Posted by John Martoano 2023-01-17 01:10|| 2023-01-17 01:10|| Front Page Top

#3 Washington had a lengthy criminal history. In 2015, he was convicted of a lesser charge of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to 15 years in prison in connection to the shooting death of 62-year-old Hamid Waraich a father of three sons who was engaged, KTRK-TV reported. He was paroled in 2021 and charged with assaulting his girlfriend in December 2022

The robee/shooter did the job that the criminal justice system wouldn't. He deserves a medal.

Posted by Shinesh Dark Lord of the Danes3020 2023-01-17 02:22|| 2023-01-17 02:22|| Front Page Top

#4 You can always count on them to take the side of their own people. They're much like Jewish people in that way. They have loyalty towards their own ethnicity.

It's a weird concept to wrap your head around if you're white.

Posted by Herman Hapsburg8987 2023-01-17 07:46|| 2023-01-17 07:46|| Front Page Top

#5 You never spent any time in the southern states, have you Herman.

Posted by Skidmark 2023-01-17 08:02|| 2023-01-17 08:02|| Front Page Top

#6 Maybe it's being picky.

But, when we have video staring us in the face showing the THUG robbing people, he should no longer be called a SUSPECT.

Or, should we also say the person rumored to be dead?

Posted by NN2N1 2023-01-17 08:07|| 2023-01-17 08:07|| Front Page Top

#7 ^ golf clap

Posted by Procopius2k 2023-01-17 08:24|| 2023-01-17 08:24|| Front Page Top

#8 You don't necessarily get to say how something ends just because you start it.

Posted by Cesare 2023-01-17 08:53|| 2023-01-17 08:53|| Front Page Top

#9 I was expecting Quanell to sound off. He hasn't been on TV in a while.
Next to be heard from is Sheila Jack-a$$ Lee.
We would normally get Sylvester Turner in here, but he's now the mayor.

Posted by ed in texas 2023-01-17 09:02|| 2023-01-17 09:02|| Front Page Top

#10 #5 southern states

You mean, like, the Caucasus?

Posted by Herman the Herban5192 2023-01-17 09:03|| 2023-01-17 09:03|| Front Page Top

#11 Quannellex sounds like one of them prescription medicines.

Posted by swksvolFF 2023-01-17 10:05|| 2023-01-17 10:05|| Front Page Top

#12 Local loser tries to rob Texans with an airsoft gun, leaving him in a State of Palestine.

Posted by swksvolFF 2023-01-17 10:07|| 2023-01-17 10:07|| Front Page Top

#13 Racist AND stupid, not a way to go thru life.

Posted by Skidmark 2023-01-17 11:26|| 2023-01-17 11:26|| Front Page Top

#14 I would not advise violent property destroying BLM riots for this incident.

Posted by Super Hose 2023-01-17 12:48|| 2023-01-17 12:48|| Front Page Top

#15 "By all means.....move."

Posted by swksvolFF 2023-01-17 12:59|| 2023-01-17 12:59|| Front Page Top

#16 Almost 40 years ago the jurors in Baton Rouge sentenced a cold blooded killer to community service and probation… look up Plauche Doucet Baton Rouge airport. Houston jurors, take note.

Posted by Glenmore 2023-01-17 14:56|| 2023-01-17 14:56|| Front Page Top

#17 During the BLM riot season, one of neighbors who is a cop in HPD told me how the brass were afraid the marches in houston would turn violent. So the HPD kept them under control. They were afraid that if they rioted and started burning and looting, it'd be a bloodbath when they got out of downtown and hit residential. And it would have been because SO many people in this area simply won't roll over. You try to destroy their stuff and they WILL KILL YOU. And the laws in this state let you do it. After dark, we are permitted to employ lethal force to prevent virtually any criminal mischief on our property.

SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY

Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.

(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor; or

(2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:

(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and

(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:

(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or

(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and

(3) he reasonably believes that:

(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or

(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 9.43. PROTECTION OF THIRD PERSON'S PROPERTY. A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property; or

(2) the actor reasonably believes that:

(A) the third person has requested his protection of the land or property;

(B) he has a legal duty to protect the third person's land or property; or

(C) the third person whose land or property he uses force or deadly force to protect is the actor's spouse, parent, or child, resides with the actor, or is under the actor's care.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Sec. 9.44. USE OF DEVICE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. The justification afforded by Sections 9.41 and 9.43 applies to the use of a device to protect land or tangible, movable property if:

(1) the device is not designed to cause, or known by the actor to create a substantial risk of causing, death or serious bodily injury; and

(2) use of the device is reasonable under all the circumstances as the actor reasonably believes them to be when he installs the device.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1975, 64th Leg., p. 913, ch. 342, Sec. 6, eff. Sept. 1, 1975. Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.

Posted by Silentbrick 2023-01-17 15:58|| 2023-01-17 15:58|| Front Page Top

#18 Soros DA can’t spring you if you are dead.

Posted by Super Hose 2023-01-17 21:52|| 2023-01-17 21:52|| Front Page Top

23:44 Titus tse Tung7019
23:28 746
23:18 trailing wife
22:45 Skidmark
22:44 Skidmark
22:42 Skidmark
22:41 Skidmark
22:34 Skidmark
22:30 Skidmark
22:27 Skidmark
22:23 Super Hose
22:21 Skidmark
22:19 Skidmark
22:17 Skidmark
22:16 Skidmark
22:15 Skidmark
22:03 Super Hose
22:01 DooDahMan
21:54 Super Hose
21:52 Super Hose
21:21 DooDahMan
21:10 ed in texas
19:14 USN, Ret.
18:56 Frank G