| | Posted by | Text | Date/Time | IP |
|---|
| 1 |
Red Dog |
as per usual:
surrender |
2006-01-13 11:45 |
69.226.252.89 |
| 2 |
Red Dog AU commish |
Hokay evil Me
I surender
|
2006-01-13 11:44 |
69.226.252.89 |
| 3 |
Bird Dog |
stupid in america..?
what did the british healines say when bush was re-elected?
"How could 50 million+ Americans be so STUPID?"
LMAO |
2006-01-13 16:19 |
131.158.129.20 |
| 4 |
Bird Dog |
" President Bush Attempts To Shore Up Iraq Support"
By Jim Malone
Washington
13 January 2006
President Bush continued his efforts this week to rebuild public support for his handling of Iraq with speeches this week in Washington and Kentucky. But, those Democrats who oppose him on Iraq are not backing down.
Iraq figures to be a major issue in the November congressional elections, and Mr. Bush is trying to improve Republican prospects by convincing the public that the United States must stay in Iraq and finish the job.
But the president also had words for Democrats who oppose him on Iraq, warning them not to engage in what he called irresponsible debate in the months ahead.
"But one way people can help as we are coming down the pike in the 2006 elections is to remember the effect that rhetoric can have on our troops in harms way and the effect that rhetoric can have in emboldening or weakening an enemy," he said.
Democrats remain split on Iraq but many of them disagree with the president's suggestion to tamp down the debate over Iraq.
Democratic Congressman Jim Moran of Virginia discussed the issue during a recent town hall meeting with some of his constituents.
"There is nothing more patriotic, nothing more American than engaging in a debate, even an intense, heated, contentious debate over the future our nation should take," he said."
Something very interesting happened in this site yesterday. An article similar to the one I posted above listed President Bush as making the almost the exact same quote in paragraph#3 of this post.
I made the point that I thought that the quote was politically motivated and the basis of it
is unproven in regards to Iraq. I asked Bush supporters in this site to "prove" what Bush was saying was true. In other words provide surveys, or statistics that show that there is a connection between anti war rhetoric/criticism and events covered in the MSM and "embolding the
enemy" in surges of violent attacks on the U.S. military and Iraqi coalition supporters in Iraq. I also asked for documented"proof" that anti-war critism/rhetoric is indeed as Mr. Bush proclaims is "demoralizing the troops in harms way".
To me these are two very simple logical questions challenging President Bush's assertions.
What I got in rebuttal in this website was a two long ago instances in Germany and Vietnam that were supposedly similar to what is going on in Iraq and also a discredited letter from Al Qaeda
in Iraq leader Ayman Al Zawahri.
I dismissed all of this so called "proof" on the grounds that all of it was flawed. I asked specifically about what is going on in Iraq currently NOT what happened in Germany and Vietnam. The Al Zawahri letter was discredited in the very article the rebuttal poster listed.
What followed was a flurry of ad hominen attacks
on me by the regular posters in this site with my rebuttal post being "redacted" by the "neutral" site moderator.
I as well as some of my democratic associates who monitor this site all shook our heads in disbelief
and amazement at the responses. Apparently this site has a double standard for posters. If you agree with the proprieter of this site and his
viewpoints you are free to "troll", use inflammatory language and profanity and call people names as long as it's against the people he views as the "enemy". If you do it in oppositon you are labeled a "troll" have your
post dedacted and are threatened with being banned. Evidently the regular posters and the proprieters of this site are only interested in
dialogue with people that agree with them.
Civlized discourse is definitely NOT what is
happening in here for sure.
|
2006-01-13 16:10 |
131.158.129.20 |
| 5 |
Ray Gunn |
Yes, I agree. The democrats are a traitorous, treasonous, cowardly bunch who want to appease the enemy with their limpwristed legalistic approach to the WOT. We must hunt the enemy out
and kill them before they kill us.
The anti-Iraq war of rhetoric democratic leaders and that of the anti-war movement emboldens the enemy and is demoralizing our troops. These people are aiding and abetting the enemy.
President Bush is constitutionally correct to wiretap anyone in the U.S. who he believes has connections with to Al Qaeda. More than likely,
many within the Anti-Iraq War Movement have ties with terrorist organizations and are purposely
drumming up opposition to President Bush's GWOT
policies with the goal of weakening our resolve
to quit fighting before victory is achieved.
Yes, the Democrats, the Anti Iraq-War movment in the U.S. and the terrorist in Iraq should all be considered as one: The enemies of the U.S. |
2006-01-13 10:01 |
131.158.129.20 |
| 6 |
AU commish |
Sudan Troops Disguising as Peacekeepers in Darfur
shhhhh they're watching us
 |
2006-01-13 09:55 |
69.226.225.180 |