Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 04/23/2025 View Tue 04/22/2025 View Mon 04/21/2025 View Sun 04/20/2025 View Sat 04/19/2025 View Fri 04/18/2025 View Thu 04/17/2025
2025-02-22 -Short Attention Span Theater-
Acting Social Security chief opens up on DOGE, claims of dead people receiving benefits
[FoxBusiness] Elon Musk said DOGE's review found large numbers of people over the age of 100 in Social Security's system

The acting head of the Social Security Administration opened up on the activities of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) at the agency, as well as claims about millions of dead people receiving benefits.

Acting Commissioner Lee Dudek said that DOGE "is a critical part of President Trump's commitment to finding fraud, waste, and abuse, and better ways for the government to function to support its people."

"I want to be very clear about the DOGE personnel who are now working at Social Security," Dudek said. "DOGE personnel CANNOT make changes to agency systems, benefit payments, or other information. They only have READ access. DOGE personnel do not have access to data related to a court ordered temporary restraining order, current or future. DOGE personnel must follow the law and if they violate the law they will be referred to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution."

Dudek's statement also discussed reports about Social Security beneficiaries over the age of 100 receiving benefits, which followed comments Musk made in the Oval Office with President Trump last week.

“I also want to acknowledge recent reporting about the number of people older than age 100 who may be receiving benefits from Social Security," Dudek said. "The reported data are people in our records with a Social Security number who do not have a date of death associated with their record. These individuals are not necessarily receiving benefits."

Musk said that the Social Security system has "people in there that are about 150 years old" and that "there are a whole bunch of Social Security payments where there's no identifying information, like, why is there no identifying information?"

Later, in a post on X, Musk posted a picture of a spreadsheet he said was from the Social Security database showing the numbers of people in each age bucket with the death field set to false. It showed more than 17 million such records for people over the age of 100.

In 2015, the Social Security Administration (SSA) and its inspector general looked into the number of people in the system with no death record who were listed as being over the age of 112. SSA found 6.5 million numberholders aged 112 or older with no death information in the system, but noted that other records suggested the majority of them were deceased.

Of those, SSA issued payments to 266 numberholders — though the IG's review indicated only 13 beneficiaries were likely age 112 or older, while in the remaining 253 cases there were discrepancies in SSA's records that indicated the beneficiary wasn't actually that old.

Following the review, the SSA decided not to proceed with adding presumed death information to the records because it would be costly to implement, provide little benefit to the agency and duplicate other information already available in government data exchanges.
Posted by Skidmark 2025-02-22 09:03|| || Front Page|| [10329 views ]  Top

#1 Sounds like one of those big firm audits where they have twentysomethings from ivy league schools go through your records.

They really need an ORSE board level inspection.
Posted by Penguin_of_the_Best_Desert  2025-02-22 13:59||   2025-02-22 13:59|| Front Page Top

#2 OK, I understand that just because somebody's in SS's records, it doesn't mean that they necessarily draw benefits.
Here's the thing. If someone of current age 369 was recorded on original files, they had to be at least 250 at the earliest records (Aug 14, 1935). Or they were added later.
Either way, your records obviously have errors.
That was just the first look at the records, without detailed examination. (I have read that SSA challenges people in regards to benefits at age 115. OK, good.)
Posted by ed in texas 2025-02-22 14:23||   2025-02-22 14:23|| Front Page Top

#3 "It only looks like dead people are collecting benefits because our record-keeping sucks. So there."
Posted by Matt 2025-02-22 14:25||   2025-02-22 14:25|| Front Page Top

#4 More interesting is who were these records shared with, particularly political parties. There must be a trail.
Posted by jefe101 2025-02-22 15:23||   2025-02-22 15:23|| Front Page Top

#5 How a mid-level staffer rose to oversee the Social Security Administration within days
Posted by Skidmark 2025-02-22 16:43||   2025-02-22 16:43|| Front Page Top

#6 Does he have taps on those shoes? He is dancing up a storm with his double speak. "Not necessarily", is bureaucrat for I dont know...
Posted by 49 Pan 2025-02-22 22:51||   2025-02-22 22:51|| Front Page Top

11:39 Frank G
11:06 Grom the Affective
10:30 Lord Garth
09:45 Rat Spit
09:39 Warthog
09:29 DarthVader
09:18 NN2N1
09:11 NN2N1
09:07 Mullah Richard
09:05 NN2N1
09:04 DarthVader
09:00 ed in texas
08:54 SteveS
08:51 MikeKozlowski
08:51 Procopius2k
08:47 SteveS
08:42 SteveS
08:34 SteveS
08:27 Skidmark
08:26 Skidmark
08:16 Skidmark
08:12 Skidmark
08:04 Skidmark
07:39 Gluson









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com