|
2024-11-26 Fifth Column
|
|
Controversial Muslim group CAIR forced to reveal sources of funding after defamation case against former employee backfires
|
 [NY Post ht Insty] Discovery is a bitch
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) will be forced to open its books and reveal its sources of funding after a defamation suit it filed against a former employee completely backfired.
US Magistrate Judge David Schultz ruled Monday that CAIR’s donors, funding sources — including potentially foreign ones — and any assets owned by the group are all within the "scope of permissible discovery" as part of former chapter leader Lori Saroya’s lawsuit against the controversial Muslim rights group.
Saroya filed a federal defamation complaint against CAIR in January after the group dropped its own lawsuit against the former employee, which accused her of embarking on a "defamation campaign" against the organization, including by implying that CAIR is funded by foreign governments and terrorist organizations.
CAIR alleged that Saroya’s statements — posted on social media, in comment sections and emailed to the group’s supporters — damaged the organization’s ability to fundraise and build partnerships, but it ultimately dropped the lawsuit in January of 2022 over fears that Saroya’s legal team would "demand the names of CAIR supporters who have donated to us."
Jeffrey Robbins, Saroya’s lawyer, described Monday’s ruling as "the mother of all legal boomerangs."
"It’s a very important ruling," Robbins said of the Minnesota district court judge’s order, in an interview with The Post, noting that the ruling is "very methodical, very careful, very detailed and very analytical."
Robbins explained that the order will force CAIR to "turn over evidence about everything from fundraising practices, such as having raised money from foreign sources and concealed it; whether it deceived donors; whether it mismanaged donor money; whether it retaliated against employees or threatened to retaliate against employees for raising concerns about sexual harassment or the like."
The judge noted that "the thrust of CAIR’s allegations against Saroya in the 2021 complaint is that Saroya falsely implied CAIR received funding from foreign governments and terrorists when she stated CAIR accepted ’international funding through their Washington Trust Foundation.'"
Schultz stated that "CAIR points to no public admission that it received funding from terrorists or that it received funding through the Washington Trust Foundation" but "discovery into these matters is proportionate to the needs of the case."
"CAIR has not shown that the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, or that it unwarrantedly taxes its resources," he ruled.
CAIR 
|
Posted by Frank G 2024-11-26 05:35||
||
Front Page|| [11137 views ]
Top
File under: Devout Moslems
|
|
Posted by Penguin_of_the_Best_Desert 2024-11-26 08:16||
2024-11-26 08:16||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Skidmark 2024-11-26 09:00||
2024-11-26 09:00||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Skidmark 2024-11-26 10:14||
2024-11-26 10:14||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Super Hose 2024-11-26 12:40||
2024-11-26 12:40||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Frank G 2024-11-26 13:37||
2024-11-26 13:37||
Front Page
Top
|
|
13:12 Pancho Poodle8452
13:09 Skidmark
13:09 Clem+Elmish4239
13:08 Clem+Elmish4239
13:06 alanc
12:48 Besoeker
12:48 Besoeker
12:37 Frank G
12:35 SteveS
12:22 Grom the Affective
12:15 Skidmark
12:09 Grom the Affective
12:00 Skidmark
11:52 Skidmark
11:45 Skidmark
11:41 Skidmark
11:38 Skidmark
11:33 Skidmark
11:22 Rambler
11:13 ed in texas
11:07 ed in texas
11:05 Super Hose
11:04 Super Hose
11:01 Super Hose
|
