Article

2024-07-02 -Land of the Free

[Yahoo via CFP] The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that former President Donald Trump is entitled to immunity from prosecution for "official acts" taken during his presidency. But in a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the court also ruled that he does not have immunity for his "unofficial acts" — and that not everything a president does can be considered official, as Trump had claimed.

"The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. "The President is not above the law. But under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts.
RTWT__
Gee, Yahoo, pick a side, no need to be so ... nuanced?

Posted by Mercutio 2024-07-02 09:30|| || Front Page|| [11138 views ] Top

#1 This will lead to a conundrum in Bragg’s case, the one that was sort of a enigma already.

Posted by Super Hose 2024-07-02 12:31|| 2024-07-02 12:31|| Front Page Top

#2 Does that also means the difference between official e-mail/text/voice communications vs. unofficial?

Posted by swksvolFF 2024-07-02 13:46|| 2024-07-02 13:46|| Front Page Top

14:31 Regular joe
14:28 trailing wife
14:25 magpie
14:18 Elmerert Hupens2660
14:14 Regular joe
14:10 Super Hose
14:08 Super Hose
14:08 Regular joe
14:02 Super Hose
14:01 trailing wife
14:01 trailing wife
13:58 trailing wife
13:56 Super Hose
13:54 trailing wife
13:51 Super Hose
13:44 Elmerert Hupens2660
13:22 Difar Dave
13:20 alanc
13:19 swksvolFF
13:17 Difar Dave
13:00 NN2N1
12:59 alanc
12:51 swksvolFF
12:46 Skidmark