Article

2024-04-28 Government Corruption

Newly Unsealed Transcripts Further Prove Mar-a-Lago Raid Was a Setup

Good to know.

[Gateway] Newly unsealed transcripts of a witness interview with a DOJ prosecutor further prove Trump was set up.

Judge Aileen Cannon ordered documents unsealed in Jack Smith’s classified documents case against Trump.

An unidentified witness told DOJ prosecutor Michael Thakur that after the Trump Administration ended, the General Services Administration (GSA) stored six pallets of boxes in Virginia. They eventually contacted Trump’s team and told them to come pick up the boxes.

These were the boxes that ended up having documents with "classified markings" on them. The boxes were dumped outside of DC in Virginia and then ended up at Mar-a-Lago.

This was a total setup.

Posted by Besoeker 2024-04-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11147 views ] Top

#1 I don’t think they added anything to the pallet, but they had an exact inventory and were in a hurry to get the material into Trump’s hands. Canceling his Q clearance without telling him
was key. All planned during the Trump Admin. You know what you call when the Executive staff conspires to set up a sitting president. It’s called treason.

Posted by Super Hose 2024-04-28 13:46|| 2024-04-28 13:46|| Front Page Top

#2 FROM CTH 24 Apr 24; link below:
"Last year, CTH outlined a four-part series of articles going deep into the background of the DOJ-FBI raid of President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, along with the outline into why it was important to them. It doesn’t matter how many different legal angles and Deep State justifications the DOJ attempts to deploy in order to divert away from what took place; the background of who, what, when and why they raided Mar-a-Lago will not change.

In Part One, we outlined the background of the modern Deep State {Go Deep}. In Part Two, we outlined the specifics of how President Trump was targeted by political operatives using tools created by the DC system {Go Deep}. In Part Three, we outlined how and why President Trump was blocked from releasing documents {Go Deep}. And then finally, in Part four {GO DEEP} , we assembled the specifics of what documents likely existed in Mar-a-Lago.

It is important to remember, the Presidential Records Act –the presented pretext for the document conflict– is not a criminal statute. An FBI raid cannot be predicated on a document conflict between the National Archives and a former president.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was a retrieval effort where the DOJ/FBI were looking for evidence of their misconduct that Donald Trump may have taken with him after his time in office.

That’s it, that was the core purpose.

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) documents issue was the auspices or justification for the raid, but that wasn’t the intent of the raid.

The DOJ/FBI was on a search mission to retain full control of the evidence that showed corrupt and illegal conduct by people in the Obama administration. The DOJ, FBI, DOJ-NSD, FBI Counterintelligence Division, ODNI, CIA, SSCI and Legislative Gang of Eight, all participated or were willfully blind to the 2016/2017 activity of a weaponized government targeting a Republican political candidate. This action was grossly illegal and unlawful. Every action taken post-election was taken to mitigate the legal risk of the participants.

Jack Smith (remember, it’s really McCord, Eisen and Weissmann) was hunting for evidence of the DOJ/FBI misconduct. That’s the background context her...
The special counsel was looking for documents held by Donald Trump that touched on declassification and/or pertained to John Durham and Crossfire Hurricane. They were looking for documentary evidence against them that Trump may have held (he did and likely still does).

Again, (1) Crossfire Hurricane, (2) Robert Mueller and (3) John Durham was all one long continuum with a shift in operational intent. CH was the original targeting, RM was the continuation of the targeting and coverup, JD was the coverup and run out the clock operation that never looked at anything RM did.

The number (4) in the continuum was/is Jack Smith.

Judge Aileen Cannon can clearly see the construct of the fraudulent case against Donald Trump; however, she needs to tread carefully. Mary McCord, Andrew Weissmann and Norm Eisen are using “national security” as a tool to subvert and control the judicial branch while railroading President Trump."

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/04/24/big-picture-judge-cannon-unseals-and-un-redacts-trump-legal-motion-that-exposes-doj-fraudulent-case-against-him/#more-260337

Posted by NoMoreBS 2024-04-28 14:28|| 2024-04-28 14:28|| Front Page Top

#3 Well, don't worry. I'm sure Jim Jordan and Mike Johnson and Senator Ron Johnson will be all over this and get to the bottom of this. There WILL be reprocussions!!!! not

Posted by DooDahMan 2024-04-28 14:53|| 2024-04-28 14:53|| Front Page Top

#4 More dour handwringing by "scumdance."

Posted by M. Murcek 2024-04-28 15:29|| 2024-04-28 15:29|| Front Page Top

#5 I generally refrain from contentious remarks about other Rantburgers, but this passes a certain triggerpoint. You may find the enormous levels of research and opinion from CTH et al as inaccurate, or negative, but I read it extensively, find it often insightful, and in none of the things Sundance and his spouse have written would the word "scum" be accurate or fitting. Pissing contests here are tedious and unhelpful, as I have noted in your past interactions with others, so I will avoid that waste of time. But this comment is unwarranted!

Posted by NoMoreBS 2024-04-28 16:19|| 2024-04-28 16:19|| Front Page Top

#6 Garbage in garbage out

Posted by M. Murcek 2024-04-28 16:43|| 2024-04-28 16:43|| Front Page Top

#7 You are basically saying you like sugary breakfast cereal and people who don't are bad people.

Oooookey...

Posted by M. Murcek 2024-04-28 16:46|| 2024-04-28 16:46|| Front Page Top

#8 Insult me and then say you aren't going to trade insults.

Top shelf.

Posted by M. Murcek 2024-04-28 16:50|| 2024-04-28 16:50|| Front Page Top

#9 "My sources are impeccable. Impeccable!"

- Colin Powell

Posted by M. Murcek 2024-04-28 17:02|| 2024-04-28 17:02|| Front Page Top

#10 "His spouse?"

What's that? The eeeeevil mysogynist play?

Grow up.

Posted by M. Murcek 2024-04-28 17:05|| 2024-04-28 17:05|| Front Page Top

#11