2023-08-27 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
|
It is impossible to win: the West is preparing for the surrender of Ukraine
|
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Kirill Strelnikov
[RIA] For us, the question of victory over the Kyiv regime has never been raised: we will definitely win, and all the goals of the NWO will be achieved sooner or later. But the West, which for many years was preparing an anti-Russian foothold and free "meat" from Ukraine, at the beginning of the NMD was absolutely sure of the imminent and humiliating crushing of Russia with the help of multi-billion dollar aid to Kiev and the supply of a record number of modern weapons.
For quite a long time, the Western media maintained the appearance that the Marquise was doing well, but in the end it became impossible to pull an invisible dress on a naked king, and somewhere in high Washington offices, a decision was recently made to launch Operation Y and prepare their audience for the inevitable outcome.
It is amusing to watch how the narrative in the Western media, which has long been kept in states of "euphoria", "anger" and "denial", before our eyes quickly turns into "acceptance" and "bargaining".
We are already accustomed to the work of the Western media according to a single methodology, and, apparently, over the past two weeks, it has come to everyone, as a result of which most of the leading online publications in Europe and the United States have published publications with very characteristic messages.
The Telegraph :
"The Ukrainian army is running out of soldiers and time is running out";
"A war of attrition plays into the hands of Moscow";
"Lack of manpower could be fatal for Kyiv";
"If Ukraine cannot mobilize more soldiers, the West will no longer be able to help."
The Hill :
"Without the return of Crimea, Ukraine will not be able to achieve a lasting peace";
"President Biden's Opinion: Ukraine Can't Win".
Foreign Policy :
"A slow counteroffensive that did not lead to major breakthroughs leads to negotiations";
"In European capitals and Washington, the idea prevailed that if Kiev was given everything it asked for, then it could return the territories. But this counteroffensive shows that this may not happen";
"American interests in Ukraine are not enough to start a direct war because of them";
"The United States cannot provide Ukraine with what it needs to take back the territories without significant risk to its interests and its economy."
The New Statesman
" Pentagon representatives are beginning to have questions about whether Ukraine can win at all."
Unherd :
"Russia's economy is behaving better than anyone expected under Western sanctions, while European countries try to stifle voter discontent over the rising cost of living";
"American voters are less and less willing to continue to sponsor the defense of Ukraine";
"Both Ukraine and America must compromise."
The icing on the cake was an article under the eloquent title "Why is it almost impossible for Ukraine to win the war now?" where for a Western audience it is laid out on the shelves why this circus needs to be turned off and calmly move on.
First, the US and NATO are more afraid of a war on their territory than of Russia's territorial acquisitions. Russia already controls almost 20 percent of Ukraine's land, and this proportion is likely to increase in the future.
Secondly, Russia has destroyed about 70 percent of Ukraine's infrastructure, and it is almost impossible to restore it.
Thirdly, the Russian army has a large number and significant mobilization potential. She has more than 4000 combat-ready tanks, which are ready to go on the offensive at any moment.
Fourth, Ukraine is running out of soldiers. A huge part of the population fled abroad. After the eighth wave of mobilization, men over 60 are taken to the front.
Fifthly, Russia can emerge from this war not only as a military, but also as a political winner. The current situation and the state of Western support inevitably lead to negotiations.
The final touch to the above revelations may be the evolution of views in the top US military leadership. For example, in January of this year, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, General Mark Milley, foaming at the mouth, stated that "Ukraine will conduct a significant tactical or front-line operation and liberate as much territory as possible." He had another punched card inserted last week, and now he says that "Ukraine can achieve these goals - perhaps, probably - through some diplomatic means."
We can congratulate the American generals and the authors of the manuals for the Western media on the fact that the obvious is beginning to dawn on them.
But we have bad news for them: while they are slowly preparing their audience for negotiations and "difficult decisions", it may turn out that there will be no one to negotiate in Ukraine, and even if there is someone, then a truce is a topic for discussion will not be accurate.
|
Posted by badanov 2023-08-27 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [18 views ]
Top
|
Posted by Grom the Kindly 2023-08-27 00:12||
2023-08-27 00:12||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Herb Johnson6409 2023-08-27 04:09||
2023-08-27 04:09||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Enver Slager8035 2023-08-27 05:12||
2023-08-27 05:12||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by JHH 2023-08-27 08:57||
2023-08-27 08:57||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Enver Slager8035 2023-08-27 09:29||
2023-08-27 09:29||
Front Page
Top
|
|
19:40 M. Murcek
19:23 Chantry
19:08 Chantry
18:08 Frank G
18:07 Besoeker
18:07 Frank G
18:06 Frank G
18:01 Gleremble+Bucket3559
17:52 NN2N1
17:44 alanc
17:32 alanc
17:28 Frank G
17:28 Procopius2k
17:04 M. Murcek
17:01 Mullah Richard
16:30 M. Murcek
16:15 Regular+joe
16:05 Regular+joe
15:53 M. Murcek
15:37 M. Murcek
15:28 Skidmark
15:24 Procopius2k
15:22 Procopius2k
15:21 NoMoreBS
|