|
2023-04-01 -Short Attention Span Theater-
|
|
A Guide to Understanding the Hoax of the Century
|
 [Tablet] PROLOGUE: THE INFORMATION WAR
In 1950, Sen. Joseph McCarthy claimed that he had proof of a communist spy ring operating inside the government. Overnight, the explosive accusations blew up in the national press, but the details kept changing. Initially, McCarthy said he had a list with the names of 205 communists in the State Department; the next day he revised it to 57. Since he kept the list a secret, the inconsistencies were beside the point. The point was the power of the accusation, which made McCarthy’s name synonymous with the politics of the era.
For more than half a century, McCarthyism stood as a defining chapter in the worldview of American liberals: a warning about the dangerous allure of blacklists, witch hunts, and demagogues.
Until 2017, that is, when another list of alleged Russian agents roiled the American press and political class. A new outfit called Hamilton 68 claimed to have discovered hundreds of Russian-affiliated accounts that had infiltrated Twitter to sow chaos and help Donald Trump win the election. Russia stood accused of hacking the social media platforms, the new centers of power, and using them to covertly direct events inside the United States.
None of it was true. After reviewing Hamilton 68’s secret list, Twitter’s safety officer, Yoel Roth, privately admitted that his company was allowing "real people" to be "unilaterally labeled Russian stooges without evidence or recourse."
The Hamilton 68 episode played out as a nearly shot-for-shot remake of the McCarthy affair, with one important difference: McCarthy faced some resistance from leading journalists as well as from the U.S. intelligence agencies and his fellow members of Congress. In our time, those same groups lined up to support the new secret lists and attack anyone who questioned them.
When proof emerged earlier this year that Hamilton 68 was a high-level hoax perpetrated against the American people, it was met with a great wall of silence in the national press. The disinterest was so profound, it suggested a matter of principle rather than convenience for the standard-bearers of American liberalism who had lost faith in the promise of freedom and embraced a new ideal.
|
Posted by Besoeker 2023-04-01 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [23 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Super Hose 2023-04-01 11:27||
2023-04-01 11:27||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by NoMoreBS 2023-04-01 12:20||
2023-04-01 12:20||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Abu Uluque 2023-04-01 12:47||
2023-04-01 12:47||
Front Page
Top
|
|
18:37 Rex Mundi
18:31 Throlush Dark Lord of the Nebraskans2736
18:29 Frank G
17:51 Super Hose
17:19 Uneanter Snavith8416
16:56 Jefe101
16:32 Mullah Richard
16:29 Mullah Richard
16:27 Mullah Richard
16:19 Mullah Richard
16:16 Procopius2k
16:15 swksvolFF
16:11 Besoeker
16:09 Tom
16:08 Procopius2k
16:05 Procopius2k
16:04 Skidmark
16:04 Lord Garth
16:01 Lord Garth
15:55 M. Murcek
15:52 Lord Garth
15:30 NoMoreBS
15:16 Mullah Richard
15:12 MikeKozlowski
|
