|
2023-01-17 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
|
|
US threatens the world with a new pandemic
|
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
by Victoria Nikiforova
| The main private sponsor of this office is the notorious US citizen Bill Gates, he pours just an unmeasured amount of dollars into it. |
[RIA] Sometimes it seems that the modern information agenda is specially tailored so that what is really important does not fall into it. For example, while we were celebrating the old New Year in Geneva, the sixth meeting of the committee to review the health regulations of the World Health Organization was going on quietly and imperceptibly.
Continued from Page 4
Health regulations are mandatory in 194 countries that are part of the WHO - and this, in fact, the whole world. In 2020, we were able to fully appreciate how global the power of the Geneva office is. Masks, lockdowns, social distance, coronavirus treatment algorithms - all this was dictated to us by the WHO.
At the meetings, which began on January 12, amendments to these same International Health Regulations (IHR) were discussed. They will be finalized in May. Judging by how quietly and coherently the hearings and discussions are going on, there are no contradictions within the WHO, the amendments will be adopted, and they will be binding throughout the world.
| Are you sure? I thought they were advisory, with national governments making the final call. |
No discussions, much less ratifications at the level of national authorities are expected. The opinion of the people on these issues is also of no interest to anyone. "The doctor said, 'To the morgue!' means to the morgue."
It is interesting that a significant part of the amendments was proposed by the representation of the United States of America. This is not surprising - Washington has long been the largest sponsor of the WHO. The main private sponsor of this office is the notorious US citizen Bill Gates, he pours just an unmeasured amount of dollars into it. The American media call him "the most powerful doctor on the planet."
How is it proposed to change the Rules? Let's take a look at the official website of the WHO. First, the notion of a "public health emergency" is extremely vague. It can be an outbreak of a disease, or a natural disaster, or a collapse of infrastructure, or military conflicts, or social turbulence.
Secondly, the system of accountability and control of national governments is rigidly prescribed. About each emergency, the state where the trouble occurred should urgently inform WHO. It is especially emphasized that it is necessary to inform not only about the general nature of the disease, but also about the "genetic sequences of the virus."
| ...even if it is not a virus, one assumes. |
It was the Americans who made the amendment about the genetic sequences.
| That one sounds like it is aimed at China. |
At the same time, WHO can receive information about emergencies not only from national ministries of health, but also from some other sources. The organization is not required to disclose these sources to the government.
What follows is amazing. Within 24 hours of receiving the signal, the Rules oblige the country where the emergency occurred to start cooperation with WHO, that is, in fact, transfer the healthcare system to external management.
And if a country does not agree to this within 48 hours, then WHO discloses to all Member States all information received from that country. That is, it publishes information from the most sensitive, one might say, intimate sphere of any state - about the health of its citizens, about local viruses and infections, plus the notorious "genetic sequences" that American partners love to work with in their laboratories. Beautiful, isn't it?
It is clearly visible - in the text of the amendments it is even highlighted in bold - that the American partners are tightening the regime of WHO control over national ministries of health and governments. Wherever it used to say "WHO can do this and that", they write "WHO does this and that."
Whether a situation is an emergency and of international concern will be determined by the Director-General of WHO. Recall that today he is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
Dr. Tedros (he likes to be called by his first name) is not a doctor and never studied medicine. He is a doctor of philosophy, that is, a candidate of philosophical sciences - with our money.
PhDs insisting on being addressed as doctor socially and professionally is exceedingly common. Professionally it is appropriate, socially not so much, but few either know or care. According to Wikipedia:
In 1986, Tedros received a Bachelor of Science degree in biology from the University of Asmara. He studied at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and was awarded a Master of Science degree in immunology of infectious diseases from the University of London in 1992. In 2000, he earned a Doctor of Philosophy in community health from the University of Nottingham for research on the effects of dams on malaria transmission in the Tigray region. |
In his native Ethiopia, he was a member of the radical Tigray Liberation Front, which actively participated in the bloody civil war. After Dr. Tedros served as Minister of Health in his country, fellow citizens accused him of genocide of the Amhara people. Ah, evil tongues are worse than a gun.
The Committee of Emergency Situations, created by the CEO of WHO, will become a global medical Cheka. It will address issues such as interruption of transport and supply chains, travel bans, treatments and prevention, all on a global scale.
The revised IHR will be aligned with the new Pandemic Treaty due in 2024. Of course, the idea of "prevention of pandemics" also has a purely American origin. Partners tirelessly pump this topic at the highest level.
“The next pandemics will be much worse,” warned an official White House memo back in 2021. “Perhaps we are only a few months away from the next pandemic,” the hyped American doctor Craig Spencer echoes today to the authorities. “We are just one genetic step away from a new influenza virus that will provide us with such a catastrophic pandemic as we have never seen before.”
This is, of course, a mere coincidence, but a few days before the publication of Spencer's paper, Boston University announced that tireless researchers at its National Infectious Diseases Laboratory had managed to edit the coronavirus in such a way that it gained an unprecedented lethality of 80 percent. The study was funded by the US government. Well, who would doubt?
Let's look at the dates again. WHO plans to merge the new edition of the health regulations with the Pandemic Prevention Treaty in 2024. What will we have in 2024? That's right, the US presidential election. Figures from the Democratic Party are aware that they cannot shove their candidate into the White House in an honest way. But if you put the electorate at home and nightmare it with a new pandemic, then even Joe Biden will have a chance.
In foreign policy, the topic of the pandemic is an instrument of pressure on a country objectionable to Washington. It was Lukashenka's accusations that he was not fighting the coronavirus that became the prologue to the unsuccessful Belarusian Maidan.
Or take China. First, the Americans, who themselves created the coronavirus, shifted the blame from a sick head to a healthy one. They branded Beijing in the media, demanded reparations. China put all critics to shame and, while hundreds of thousands of people were dying in the US, achieved zero cases.
| For a given definition of zero that means a much, much larger number, while the official American number actually meant unknown orders of magnitude fewer... |
Then they began to scold him for lockdowns. Lockdowns were canceled - horror stories began about the fact that everyone there is sick and dying. An absolute lie, of course, but who cares - we live in an era of post-truth.
Any pandemic - real or fictitious - immediately becomes an excuse for Washington to run into its adversary. Today, WHO will actively help him in this.
At the same time, it is curious that after the start of the NWO, Russia was expelled from almost all international organizations that they could, but not from the WHO. They need something from us. Maybe the notorious "genetic sequences"?
It is not very clear why we ourselves remain in the Geneva office and continue to generously sponsor it, for millions of dollars a year. How long have we been in such organizations, where the Americans seized the administrative resources on the sly, how much they paid for membership, what sacrifices they made - well, what came of it?
The WTO did not protect our country from completely wild, illegal economic sanctions, the IMF did not prohibit the theft of our reserves. WADA has been mocking our athletes for years, not knowing what else to come up with to insult and humiliate us.
Moreover, no practical benefit from the WHO is visible. Domestic medicine inherits Semashko's brilliant healthcare system, which throughout the 20th century was the object of envy and an object of imitation for other countries. This system has allowed us to defeat the most dangerous infections and viruses, provide the population of a vast country with mobile medical care, and establish disease prevention - and these are things that few people have access to even in developed countries.
Why do we need the leftist anti-scientific innovations of the WHO, run by a Ph.D. with a dubious background?
| *swoon* This is a Russian objecting to leftists?? Truly we live in the age of miracles, and Donald Trump had nothing to do with this one! |
It was in Geneva that they thought of putting love on the list of mental disorders, calling homosexuality the norm and abolishing the division into men and women - no, this is not a joke, they officially force doctors there to recognize gender diversity.
I recently heard on the radio a discussion of our new law banning surrogacy for foreigners. A WHO expert, a Russian citizen, of course, was asked to speak on the topic. This lady said that the law was "adopted on emotions", untimely and unnecessary.
“But look,” the presenter was surprised, “after all, such children can get into same-sex families abroad. Is this right?” Well, what's wrong, the WHO expert objected: "In same-sex families, they usually treat children much more responsibly ..." I almost fell off my chair. It meant more responsible than traditional families.
But this lady did not speak for herself. She simply voiced the current agenda of the WHO. This is how they understand healthcare. Responsible same-sex families, gender diversity of children growing up in them. Listen, do we really need all this?
| It is a problem. Hopefully the pushback most everywhere will make it a temporary one. |
Amendments to the WHO health regulations will give our strategic adversary full access to the most sensitive, critically important information regarding our health, the epidemic situation, and the work of medical services. The topic of genetic sequences with which our American partners are working around the entire perimeter of Russia, including in the biological laboratories of Ukraine, is generally terrifying. Here, too, there is a risk of surrendering sovereignty over their own medicine with their own hands - and no one hides that Washington's proteges will steer it.
The most abnormal thing is that such important decisions for all of us - all of humanity - are made quietly, without any public discussion at all. Some murky citizens in Geneva, with the participation of scandalous American oligarchs and representatives of Big Pharma, decide everything for eight billion people. Then the decisions are voiced by their own appointed experts. No public discussion, no expert polemics. Yes, in general, in open sources of information about all this - a minuscule amount. An international organization like WHO should, in theory, record its every step, but no - you will not find on its website almost any information about how the meetings on amendments to the health regulations went.
I would like more transparency, of course, in this matter. It is no exaggeration to say that this is a matter of life and death.
|
Posted by badanov 2023-01-17 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [21 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by lord garth 2023-01-17 00:13||
2023-01-17 00:13||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Skidmark 2023-01-17 07:19||
2023-01-17 07:19||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Deacon Blues 2023-01-17 08:22||
2023-01-17 08:22||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Besoeker 2023-01-17 09:31||
2023-01-17 09:31||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Skidmark 2023-01-17 22:42||
2023-01-17 22:42||
Front Page
Top
|
|
07:36 Mullah Richard
07:35 Grom the reflective
07:25 Besoeker
07:16 Cesare
07:03 Skidmark
07:01 Besoeker
06:58 Skidmark
06:55 Besoeker
06:54 Skidmark
06:50 Skidmark
06:12 badanov
06:06 Grom the reflective
05:57 Grom the reflective
05:56 NN2N1
05:26 Besoeker
05:24 Besoeker
05:21 badanov
05:11 Elmaper+McGurque1612
05:01 Besoeker
04:39 Besoeker
04:24 Besoeker
04:21 Besoeker
04:00 Besoeker
03:46 Besoeker
|
