Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/22/2024 View Tue 05/21/2024 View Mon 05/20/2024 View Sun 05/19/2024 View Sat 05/18/2024 View Fri 05/17/2024 View Thu 05/16/2024
2022-08-30 Cyber
Facebook Tells Moderators To Allow Graphic Images Of Russian Airstrikes But Censors Israeli Attacks
It's like they're trying to manipulate your emotions to achieve the ends of the deep state in DC. Huh, Facebook employs psychologists, don't they? Weird. Just a coincidence, I guess.
The Intercept is the toy of Pierre Omidyar, yet another Progressive internet billionaire who also donates to all the usual causes and organizations. In his case, the French-born Iranian-American gave us eBay, which he ran until 2015. Under the circumstances, certain prejudices are de rigueur.
[TheIntercept] AFTER A SERIES of Israeli airstrikes against the densely populated Gaza Strip earlier this month, Palestinian Facebook and Instagram users protested the abrupt deletion of posts documenting the resulting death and destruction. It wasn’t the first time Palestinian users of the two giant social media platforms, which are both owned by parent company Meta, had complained about their posts being unduly removed. It’s become a pattern: Palestinians post sometimes graphic videos and images of Israeli attacks, and Meta swiftly removes the content, providing only an oblique reference to a violation of the company’s "Community Standards" or in many cases no explanation at all.
The poor darlings.
Not all the billions of users on Meta’s platforms, however, run into these issues when documenting the bombing of their neighborhoods.

Previously unreported policy language obtained by The Intercept shows that this year the company repeatedly instructed moderators to deviate from standard procedure and treat various graphic imagery from the Russia-Ukraine war with a light touch. Like other American internet companies, Meta responded to the invasion by rapidly enacting a litany of new policy carveouts designed to broaden and protect the online speech of Ukrainians, specifically allowing their graphic images of civilians killed by the Russian military to remain up on Instagram and Facebook.
Meta put their thumb on a scale? I’m shocked. Shocked!!
No such carveouts were ever made for Palestinian victims of Israeli state violence — nor do the materials show such latitude provided for any other suffering population.
To know who rules you, simply find who you are not allowed to criticize.
The Ukrainians? But Mr. Omidyar is — well, was — Persian. Now he follows the Dalai Lama and tries to do good in the world, as he sees it. Sometimes he is right.
RIGHTS ADVOCATES TOLD The Intercept that the exemptions made for the Russia-Ukraine war are the latest example of a double standard between Meta’s treatment of Western markets and the rest of the world — evidence of special treatment of the Ukrainian cause on Meta’s part since the beginning of the war and something that can be seen with media coverage of the war more broadly.

Though the majority of users on social platforms owned by Meta live outside the United States, critics charge that the company’s censorship policies, which affect billions worldwide, tidily align with U.S. foreign policy interests.
Sometimes, no doubt. When the U.S. government is in Democratic Party hands. They were decidedly oppositional when Donald Trump was in the White House.
Rights advocates emphasized the political nature of these moderation decisions. "Meta was capable to take very strict measures to protect Ukrainians amid the Russian invasion because it had the political will," said Shtaya, "but we Palestinians haven’t witnessed anything of these measures."

Meta’s public-facing Community Standards rulebook says: "We remove content that glorifies violence or celebrates the suffering or humiliation of others because it may create an environment that discourages participation" — noting a vague exception for "graphic content (with some limitations) to help people raise awareness about these issues." The Violent and Graphic Content policy places a blanket ban on gruesome videos of dead bodies and restricts the viewing of similar still images to adults 18 years and older.

In an expanded, internal version of the Community Standards guide obtained by The Intercept, the section dealing with graphic content includes a series of policy memos directing moderators to deviate from the standard rules or bring added scrutiny to bear on specific breaking news events. A review of these breaking news exceptions shows that Meta directed moderators to make sure that graphic imagery of Ukrainian civilians killed in Russian attacks was not deleted on seven different occasions, beginning at the immediate onset of the invasion. The whitelisted content includes acts of state violence akin to those routinely censored when conducted by the Israeli military, including multiple specific references to airstrikes.
Oh dear. Ukraine = Israel. That’s going to upset some of our new visitors. Others, of course, will be pleased, as they’ve been saying so all along.
Posted by Sonny de Medici5342 2022-08-30 00:00|| || Front Page|| [23 views ]  Top

#1 So why do the CIA and FBI prefer this?
Posted by 3dc 2022-08-30 00:26||   2022-08-30 00:26|| Front Page Top

#2 It should be obvious - showing disgusting videos of dead people provokes a disgust reaction - making people super angry at Russia. Censoring the same videos prevents people from getting super angry at Israel.

You think the psychologists who specialize in manipulating the emotions of huge numbers of people don't know this?
Posted by Sonny de Medici5342 2022-08-30 02:00||   2022-08-30 02:00|| Front Page Top

#3  showing disgusting videos of dead people provokes a disgust reaction

Very true. But, psychologically speaking, disgusting images are those of rotting flesh, feces, or vomit. The graphic images from the Ukraine-Russia contretemps (because we oughtn’t call it a proper war, according to Russia) fall under the heading of distressing and, as I recall, psych studies show that most people prefer to avoid being distressed if they can — a very different response. What those who love Palestine post, on the third hand, is correctly termed propaganda, being either selectively edited or created by the Pallywood specialists out of whole cloth.
Posted by trailing wife 2022-08-30 04:11||   2022-08-30 04:11|| Front Page Top

#4 What, TW? You mean the guests of honor at funerals don't get up and run in other parts of the world?!
Posted by Rob Crawford 2022-08-30 07:40||   2022-08-30 07:40|| Front Page Top

#5 It's an old story.
Posted by Procopius2k 2022-08-30 08:10||   2022-08-30 08:10|| Front Page Top

#6 So they're censoring the depiction of Israel as the crafty moslem killer it is. Good thing right?
Posted by Dron66046 2022-08-30 17:17||   2022-08-30 17:17|| Front Page Top

#7 Someone remind me, is it Eastasia or Eurasia that is the enemy this week?
Posted by Chealing Chomotle4158 2022-08-30 17:55||   2022-08-30 17:55|| Front Page Top

#8 Showing the same images of Israeli airstrikes tends to expose the same injured people at multiple locations.
Posted by ruprecht 2022-08-30 18:23||   2022-08-30 18:23|| Front Page Top

#9 And missiles hidden in schools and other locations.
Posted by ruprecht 2022-08-30 18:23||   2022-08-30 18:23|| Front Page Top

#10 They did show Israeli airstrike damage.

Its how we got Green Helmet Guy, Blue Helmet Dude, and Wailing Woman, and the same four child victims seen getting snacks in between takes.

Pallywood was born. And it was so ugly, its momma slapped it.
Posted by swksvolFF 2022-08-30 21:31||   2022-08-30 21:31|| Front Page Top

00:41 Grom the reflective
00:38 Raj
00:37 Raj
00:30 Beldar+Uneter3543
00:24 Beldar+Uneter3543
00:13 Raj
00:07 Lord Garth









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com