Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 05/13/2024 View Sun 05/12/2024 View Sat 05/11/2024 View Fri 05/10/2024 View Thu 05/09/2024 View Wed 05/08/2024 View Tue 05/07/2024
2022-08-11 -Great Cultural Revolution
Israeli students accuse Ben and Jerry’s of occupying tribal land in Vermont
Hattip Procopius2k.
[NYPost] Israeli students claim that ice cream maker Ben & Jerry’s is "illegally" occupying land in Vermont that once belonged to a Abenaki native American tribe and should practice what it preaches and immediately evacuate the properties.

A cheeky letter sent to B&J — signed by more than 1,000 Israeli students and academics affiliated with Students for Justice in America — accuses B&J of of hypocrisy.

"We have concluded that your company’s occupation of the Abenaki lands is illegal and we believe it is wholly inconsistent with the stated values that Ben & Jerry’s purports to maintain. Ironically, in July of the last year you announced that you would discontinue the sale of your products in Israel because you object to the Jewish State allegedly occupying Paleostinian territories," the letter to B&J’s chairperson, Anuradha Mittal said.

Continued from Page 2



The letter, provided to The Post, notes that B&J filed a lawsuit against its parent company, Unilever, in an effort to block its sale of the Vermont-based brand’s Israel business to a local franchisee so ice cream could continue to be sold in the West Bank.

Israeli students claim that ice cream maker Ben & Jerry’s is "illegally" occupying land in Vermont that once belonged to a Abenaki native American tribe and should practice what it preaches and immediately evacuate the properties.

A cheeky letter sent to B&J — signed by more than 1,000 Israeli students and academics affiliated with Students for Justice in America — accuses B&J of of hypocrisy.

"We have concluded that your company’s occupation of the Abenaki lands is illegal and we believe it is wholly inconsistent with the stated values that Ben & Jerry’s purports to maintain. Ironically, in July of the last year you announced that you would discontinue the sale of your products in Israel because you object to the Jewish State allegedly occupying Paleostinian territories," the letter to B&J’s chairperson, Anuradha Mittal said.

The letter, provided to The Post, notes that B&J filed a lawsuit against its parent company, Unilever, in an effort to block its sale of the Vermont-based brand’s Israel business to a local franchisee so ice cream could continue to be sold in the West Bank.

The new student initiative and letter is supported by Shurat HaDin
...they sure are busy — I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised...
— Israel Law Center, a Tel-Aviv based human rights
...which are usually entirely different from personal liberty...
organization dedicated to safeguarding the lives of the Jewish community and and combatting the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against the Jewish State.

"Ben & Jerry’s blatant hypocrisy has now been revealed by these Israeli students," said Shurat HaDin president, Nitsana Darshan Leitner.

"Ben and Jerry’s speak with a forked tongue."
And she gets paid! Everyone’s job should be that much fun.
The left-leaning ice cream brand had previously announced it would end sales of its products in Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank, which critics said amounted to an economic boycott of Israel.

The fallout was severe, with states including New York withdrawing millions of dollars in pension investments from B&J’s parent company, Unilever. New York is prohibited by law from doing business with entities that participate in the BDS movement against Israel.

"Ben and Jerry’s has never even offered to provide compensation to this indigenous nation in Vermont," the letter from the students’ group, which is a counterpoint to Students for Justice in Paleostine, which promotes the BDS movement against Israel, said.

"Justice, morality and boycotts are not just slogans and antisemitic weapons for your food company to point at the Jewish community in Israel. Justice and morality must begin at home."

The students demanded that B&J immediately evacuate the properties "it occupies" in South Burlington, Waterbury and Saint Albans and "return them to the Abenaki people", adding, "your company has no right to these stolen territories."

The State of Vermont recognized the Abenaki Nation in 2012.

"Vermont’s Native history started 12,900 years ago when people called the Paleo-Indians first moved into the land we now call Vermont. Since these earliest occupations nearly 13,000 years ago, Native communities have continually lived in Vermont. Native knowledge, experience, and traditions have deeply influenced many aspects of Vermont’s rich history," the Vermont Commission on Native American Affairs says on its website.

Ben & Jerry’s had no immediate comment.
Let us pause a moment to savour imagine the board meeting they’re having.
Posted by trailing wife 2022-08-11 01:43|| || Front Page|| [18 views ]  Top

#1 Heh.
Posted by Mullah Richard 2022-08-11 06:42||   2022-08-11 06:42|| Front Page Top

#2 Boy, accusing others of illegally occupying land is NOT a conversation that Israelis want to start. Yikes. It will not end well for them.
Posted by Tiny Jeater6933 2022-08-11 08:17||   2022-08-11 08:17|| Front Page Top

#3 ..they didn't start it, Ben and Jerry's were way ahead of them. On that note, if you have know human history, very very few people can claim original ownership of the land they sit on. In the West, about the only people left are the Basques.
Posted by Procopius2k 2022-08-11 08:29||   2022-08-11 08:29|| Front Page Top

#4 lawfare is a two-way street. Once you open that can of whoopass, it sprays in all directions.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-08-11 08:30||   2022-08-11 08:30|| Front Page Top

#5 Alinksy, you magnificent bastard, we read your book!

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
Posted by SteveS 2022-08-11 10:59||   2022-08-11 10:59|| Front Page Top

#6 ROFLMAO.
Posted by magpie 2022-08-11 11:40||   2022-08-11 11:40|| Front Page Top

#7 Ben and Jerry is part of that year zero no history bull-shit.
Posted by swksvolFF 2022-08-11 12:35||   2022-08-11 12:35|| Front Page Top

#8 lawfare is a two-way street.

Yupp. Neat move. Cancelling the cancelature.
Posted by Dron66046 2022-08-11 14:00||   2022-08-11 14:00|| Front Page Top

#9 Why doesn't Israel live up to its standards it's claiming to uphold here? Stop occupying land. It's pure psychological projection to accuse others of what you are guilty of yourself.
Posted by Tiny Jeater6933 2022-08-11 16:54||   2022-08-11 16:54|| Front Page Top

#10 But I thought they already gave The Sinai back to Egypt?
Posted by swksvolFF 2022-08-11 17:36||   2022-08-11 17:36|| Front Page Top

#11 Stop occupying land.

If only the Arab countries had not kept starting wars with Israel — and losing them, Tiny Jeater6933 — Israel would not have ended up doing all that conquering you object to. And having started and lost three wars in a row (1948, 1967, and 1973), if the Arab countries had been willing to give up their arrogance just the tiniest bit to negotiate peace treaties with Israel, they could have got all they’d lost plus the improvements Israel made in the meantime.

We know this is true because Israel gave Egypt back most of the Sinai (and did not have to take back the Gaza Strip) after they signed a peace treaty in 1979, Jordan got back two properties and did not have to take back the West Bank — both Egypt and Jordan have found the Palestinians just as troublesome for Arab rulers as for Jewish ones, and have refused to accept the headache. And while the Oslo Accords Israel signed with the Palestinians gave them self-determination within their communities in the Palestinian Territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, preparatory to signing a proper peace treaty which would have given them control of the rest — the Palestinians have consistently refused to sign anything since Oslo II in 1995. And we just saw in Gaza what happens when Israel just walks away from Palestinian territory — Israel completely pulled out of the Gaza Strip in 2005, and has been attacked regularly from Gaza ever since.

So you see, the reason Israel is still occupying portions of the West Bank is because despite Israeli efforts, it is the Palestinians that refuse to negotiate a serious peace treaty, not the Israelis.
Posted by trailing wife 2022-08-11 18:01||   2022-08-11 18:01|| Front Page Top

#12 The same 'objectors' have no problem with the Russians keeping Kaliningrad, formerly German East Prussia for hundreds of years which they picked up a mere 3 years before the Arabs launched their first war of annihilation against Israel.
Posted by Procopius2k 2022-08-11 18:10||   2022-08-11 18:10|| Front Page Top

#13 "The Jews? An insatiable breed,
Seizing land that they don't even need,
For they shouldn't exist!"
Sure, this Gazan was pissed,
And all billionaire Saudis agreed
That those Hebrews were selfish indeed.
Posted by Grotle Snore3355 2022-08-11 18:26||   2022-08-11 18:26|| Front Page Top

#14  Problem is Ben&Jerry are not illegally occupying someone else's land, Israel is and has been since 1967.

None of you guys would tolerate a foreign power doing to us what Israeli Jews do to the Arabs in East Jerusalem and the West bank. So why support them doing that to Arabs over there??
Posted by Omineling Forkbeard1962 2022-08-11 23:37||   2022-08-11 23:37|| Front Page Top

22:21 trailing wife
21:05 Frank G
21:04 Frank G
20:32 Silentbrick
20:30 Silentbrick
20:29 Silentbrick
19:44 Cured Romantic/Lapsed Catholic
19:32 Frank G
19:27 Silentbrick
19:24 Silentbrick
19:16 SteveS
18:55 Crusader
17:47 Skidmark
17:45 Skidmark
16:45 Besoeker
16:43 EMS Artifact
16:43 Besoeker
16:40 EMS Artifact
16:32 Procopius2k
16:24 NN2N1
15:48 Rambler in Virginia
15:22 NoMoreBS
15:19 NoMoreBS
15:09 Bangkok Billy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com