|
2022-06-27 -Land of the Free
|
|
Not much heard lately from the 'Scarf Lady' aka Dr. Debra Birx - Perhaps this is why
|
 [PJ] With several controversial SCOTUS rulings addressing divisive issues like gun rights and abortion, an exchange between Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Dr. Debra Birx during a congressional hearing on Thursday escaped scrutiny. However, if a power-hungry politician, university, or employer compelled you or someone you love to receive an experimental vaccine in the last two years, it may make you furious. And Birx should be ashamed of herself for not speaking out earlier.
The House Oversight and Reform Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis held a hearing with Birx Thursday morning. Jordan questioned Birx on the United States’ participation in and funding of the World Health Organization and gain of function research. Birx was candid that she felt the United States should withhold funding from the WHO until needed reforms occurred. She also admitted the U.S. should not participate in some gain-of-function research, such as any in China.
However, Jordan’s questions about the Biden administration’s message on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness should shock the conscience. Jordan asked Birx if the government was lying or guessing when it told the public that people who received the vaccination couldn’t get COVID. Birx responded that she did not know. However, she continued (emphasis added):
"All I know is there was evidence from the global pandemic that natural reinfection was occurring. Since the vaccine was based on natural immunity, you cannot make the conclusion that the vaccine will do better than natural infection. Although it can often do slightly better."
It is unclear what vaccine produces better immunity to an illness than recovering from a natural infection, nor did Birx expand. Why didn’t she speak up about this while still in office? Public health "experts" like Dr. Anthony Fauci actively tried to convince Americans that natural immunity was inferior to the jabs. It is also unclear what large numbers of reinfections Birx was referring to, since most positive post-infection tests were reported in asymptomatic people. One study in preprint finds that the spike protein, the part of the virus the tests detect, can be in a recovered patient’s body for up to 12 months post-infection. How this could affect post-recovery testing in asymptomatic patients is unknown. 
|
Posted by Besoeker 2022-06-27 03:18||
||
Front Page|| [11130 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Skidmark 2022-06-27 08:13||
2022-06-27 08:13||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Skidmark 2022-06-27 08:16||
2022-06-27 08:16||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Frank G 2022-06-27 08:49||
2022-06-27 08:49||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by NN2N1 2022-06-27 09:20||
2022-06-27 09:20||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-27 09:32||
2022-06-27 09:32||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by ruprecht 2022-06-27 09:56||
2022-06-27 09:56||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-06-27 10:06||
2022-06-27 10:06||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by trailing wife 2022-06-27 14:20||
2022-06-27 14:20||
Front Page
Top
|
|
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1
07:22 NN2N1
07:18 trailing wife
07:14 Richard Aubrey
07:10 NN2N1
07:09 Besoeker
07:03 NN2N1
06:58 NN2N1
06:58 Besoeker
05:28 Whiskey Mike
05:23 Whiskey Mike
05:21 Whiskey Mike
05:18 Whiskey Mike
05:15 Whiskey Mike
05:13 Whiskey Mike
05:08 Whiskey Mike
|
