Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 04/24/2024 View Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024 View Fri 04/19/2024 View Thu 04/18/2024
2022-01-09 Science & Technology
New study of Pfizer's COVID vaccine has some disturbing findings
[American Thinker] I just read a disturbing study of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine's efficacy by the Canadian COVID Care Alliance. This organization comprises over 500 independent Canadian doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners. The title of the article, "The Pfizer Inoculations for COVID-19: More Harm Than Good," is disturbing. The article itself, which discusses the many nuances of this study, is even more distressing.

You may recall the much-reported "95% efficacy" of the vaccine against COVID-19. We all assumed that if we were vaccinated, we would then only have a 5% chance of becoming infected. Sounds great, but the statement is misleading. In the Pfizer study, only 8 out of 18,198, or 0.043% of participants who received the vaccine, contracted COVID, while 162 out of 18,325, 0.884% in the control group who received injections of saline became infected. Therefore, while there was a Relative Risk Reduction of 95%, the Actual Risk Reduction was a mere 0.84%.

This disparity certainly changes one's perspective on just how effective the vaccine is. Everyone in the study, including the control group, had a less than 1% chance of infection. Of course, as the virus spread throughout the population, a higher percentage of people became infected. The conclusions of the study remain the same insofar as the likelihood of the vaccine preventing infection in any given controlled group of persons.

The article also asserts, among other things, that the study was conducted on relatively young and healthy persons but was then recommended to be used first on old, less healthy individuals. The trials did not follow scientific protocols, owing to the desire for rapid deployment. Follow-up studies were made virtually impossible because as subjects were unblinded — made aware of whether they had received the vaccine or the placebo. The unvaccinated largely chose to receive the vaccine. Thus, there is no control group remaining to study

The most damning findings concerned the lack of disclosure of possible, or even likely, long-term health risks on vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals. These findings revealed significant increases for the vaccinated. It also pointed out that for adolescents and children, the vaccine posed all risk with virtually no benefit, since those young individuals, even if they became infected, had a near-universal good outcome. Myocarditis and other afflictions are a substantial health hazard facing vaccinated young people.

I would urge everyone to read this study by going to the link above. Seek out other studies and reports. We all owe it to ourselves to become informed and educated about something this important. Our lives and those of our children are at stake. We must also demand more disclosure than we have been receiving from the drug companies and from our government officials. Their priorities, whether political or profit-driven, are different from ours. The questions concerning those who have placed their political status or their desire for greater profits above the welfare of the population are subjects for another day.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-01-09 02:44|| || Front Page|| [11 views ]  Top

#1 Additional Pfizer research data arriving in 75 years.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-01-09 02:47||   2022-01-09 02:47|| Front Page Top

#2 I am anti vaccine. But the writer of this article is fataly bad at understanding math.
Posted by flash91 2022-01-09 03:40||   2022-01-09 03:40|| Front Page Top

#3 When the CDC and the FDA said it would take 75 years to produce the files, it was a big red flag to me
I took the booster on the strong advice of my oncologist
I was in bed with a number of side effects, such as, elevated pulse rates into the 150 range, severe headaches, shortness of breath and fatigue
Reading these papers makes me wonder why they rolled these monsters out and why they didn’t withdraw them
I read somewhere that over 458,000 worldwide have died from vaccine related side effects and those have been lumped in with the COVID deaths
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2022-01-09 10:37||   2022-01-09 10:37|| Front Page Top

#4 It's not truly a vaccine. It's actually a super-risky gene therapy that teaches the body to manufacture spike proteins. This means that its effects are much riskier and much less predictable than a normal vaccine.

For public health policy, the big problem is that the risk-benefit calculus varies enormously by age. Young people are at almost zero risk from COVID but are at great risk of myocarditis from the vaccine.

If we had followed the Great Barrington Declaration doctors' wise approach and focused our efforts on the elderly, we would have been far better off in every way.

This self-inflicted catastrophe has destroyed public confidence in the medical profession and shown our political class to be power-mad idiots who blindly follow each other's worst instincts without any regard for data, evidence or logic.
Posted by Merrick Ferret 2022-01-09 11:14||   2022-01-09 11:14|| Front Page Top

#5 @3
Funny how they can kick out and give EUA in a couple of months but they have to peacemeal that data over 75 years because of the "undue burden" to review the data. I have to site Biden, "c'mon, man".

@1
Did you see where a fed judge told the FDA they were full of s**t and ordered to kick out 55,000 pages per month?
Posted by Ebbeper Omoluger3320 2022-01-09 11:40||   2022-01-09 11:40|| Front Page Top

#6 AfterPfiser, my resting heart beat went from 60 to 40 and stayed there for almost 6 weeks. I developed AFIB and blood clots in the heart. 10 months later I am starting to feel and think better. Send shots to Aidan if we can’t nuke them!
Posted by Gpa Cooky 2022-01-09 13:48||   2022-01-09 13:48|| Front Page Top

#7 This is basic stuff - absolute vs relative risk. Pfizer plays the same numbers game with Lipitor marketing.

What's really interesting is that the study group of 18,000 individuals had a less than 1% case rate while the general population was more like 15%.
Posted by Angstrom 2022-01-09 16:38||   2022-01-09 16:38|| Front Page Top

#8 Also, for giggles, look at Maddy de Garay. 12 year girl in the Pfizer kids trial. Had a stroke. She's 13 now in a wheelchair with a feeding tube. Pfizer wrote up the adverse event as "stomach upset."
Posted by Angstrom 2022-01-09 16:41||   2022-01-09 16:41|| Front Page Top

#9 Selling a product with zero ramifications.

You should expect lies in the sales pitch.
Posted by flash91 2022-01-09 17:21||   2022-01-09 17:21|| Front Page Top

#10 So, it's less "If it saves just one life," and more "We have to destroy the village to save it."
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-01-09 17:24||   2022-01-09 17:24|| Front Page Top

#11 I'm not anti-vaccine but I'm drifting in that direction more and more. The missus and I have both had two Moderna jabs plus the booster. However, we both probably will get no future jabs. The more this Washington circus goes on, the more distrust is fostered. There is a total lack of transparency regarding anything coming out of D.C. These people are dishonest and have no regard for the American people.
Posted by JohnQC 2022-01-09 17:25||   2022-01-09 17:25|| Front Page Top

#12 There are a growing number of studies (in the vicinity of 1000)all debunking the safety of these "vaccines". The Media's compliant silence on the allegations against Pfizer's testing practices is truly impressive. Is it any wonder that more and more people (just not seemingly here in NZ)are beginning to awaken from the governmental induced fear coma?
Posted by JakTheRipper 2022-01-09 22:50||   2022-01-09 22:50|| Front Page Top

#13 Vaxxed were 20 times less likely to be infected.

"Actual risk reduction" doesn't make any sense.
Posted by KBK 2022-01-09 23:25||   2022-01-09 23:25|| Front Page Top

#14 Nobel Prize winner Dr. Luc Montagnier:
"It would be irrational, legally indefensible and contrary to the public interest for government to mandate vaccines absent any evidence that the vaccines are effective in stopping the spread of the pathogen they target. Yet that’s exactly what’s happening here...."
Posted by Merrick Ferret 2022-01-09 23:32||   2022-01-09 23:32|| Front Page Top

10:13 AlmostAnonymous5839
10:11 AlmostAnonymous5839
09:51 DarthVader
09:50 Besoeker
09:43 Crusader
09:41 MikeKozlowski
09:18 ed in texas
09:16 ed in texas
09:15 ed in texas
09:12 ed in texas
09:08 ed in texas
09:07 ed in texas
09:04 ed in texas
09:02 Whiskey Mike
08:45 Besoeker
08:34 Skidmark
08:32 MikeKozlowski
08:28 Cesare
08:26 Besoeker
08:23 Warthog
08:21 Warthog
08:16 Grom the Reflective
08:11 Skidmark
08:01 alanc









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com