|
2021-11-13 Israel-Palestine-Jordan
|
|
New proof that it was Hamas ‐ not Israel ‐ that committed war crimes last May
|
 [NY Post] Well.....duh
In its conflict with Hamas in May, Israel endured a barrage of rockets — as well as war-crime accusations. Iron Dome intercepted most of the former. The latter are more dangerous, for Israel and even the United States.
After reviewing the Israeli Defense Forces’ operations during the Gaza conflict as retired senior US military officers, we find these accusations spurious — fed by Hamas’ disinformation and a widespread misunderstanding of the Law of Armed Conflict, or LOAC. These dynamics could soon feature in conflicts involving the US military.
Delegitimizing Israeli operations — not military victory — was one of Hamas’ main objectives in this conflict. "The real crimes," Hamas’ spokesperson told the media, "were committed by [Israel] targeting civilians ... killing more than 100 children and women and demolishing buildings."
With such false claims, Hamas casts any civilian casualty as illegal. Unfortunately, many in the media and public embraced this false narrative.
"Destroying a civilian residence sure seems like a war crime," comedian John Oliver opined on his show. Seeming like a war crime and being one are quite different.
LOAC requires militaries to distinguish between — and only attack — military, not civilian, targets. Commanders are obliged to make a good-faith effort to take all feasible precautions to mitigate civilian risk.
These rules do not preclude unavoidable civilian casualties. It is a sad but undeniable reality of war that international law tolerates harm to civilians if it’s not deliberately inflicted, caused by indiscriminate attacks and avoidable with feasible precautions.
In our professional opinion, Israeli actions in Gaza reflected a consistent and good-faith commitment to respect and implement these LOAC principles.
IDF military legal advisers vetted all proposed targets. Its commanders took all feasible precautionary measures, at times implementing more than the law required as a matter of policy. The IDF dropped leaflets, placed phone calls and sent text messages warning Gazan civilians in advance of airstrikes.
Small "knock on the roof" munitions delivered further warning. We saw footage of the IDF waiting for civilians to clear a building — and of commanders calling off strikes when they did not.
These precautions came at a cost. They often allowed enemy fighters to escape. They also tied up Israeli aircraft, reducing the number of targets that could be monitored or struck. The IDF accepted these costs because of its commitment to protecting civilians. 
|
Posted by Frank G 2021-11-13 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [11145 views ]
Top
File under: Hamas
|
|
05:19 Grom the Affective
05:08 NN2N1
04:55 NN2N1
04:32 Grom the Affective
04:28 Grom the Affective
03:42 Skidmark
03:31 Grom the Affective
03:28 Grom the Affective
03:27 Whiskey Mike
03:24 Grom the Affective
03:20 Grom the Affective
03:17 Grom the Affective
02:48 Grom the Affective
01:15 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
00:46 Anguper Hupomosing9418
|
