Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 05/19/2024 View Sat 05/18/2024 View Fri 05/17/2024 View Thu 05/16/2024 View Wed 05/15/2024 View Tue 05/14/2024 View Mon 05/13/2024
2021-09-20 China-Japan-Koreas
China no like'ee new 'AUKUS' Pacific agreement
[Politico] Beijing is denouncing the U.S. government’s new "AUKUS" technology-sharing working group with the U.K. and Australia as a threat to peace in the Indo-Pacific region.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian on Thursday slammed the grouping as a reflection of "outdated Cold War zero-sum mentality and narrow-minded geopolitical perception" that "intensified" a regional arms race and harmed international non-proliferation efforts.
"How dare you defend yourselves, hegemonic running dogs!"
That rhetoric — including Zhao’s reference to "cliques" designed to target "third party" countries — reflects the Chinese government’s recognition that the U.S. has been able to rally allies in the Indo-Pacific to counter Beijing’s increasingly aggressive moves in the region. The AUKUS deal makes no explicit reference to China, but two U.S. officials noted that the subtext of the announcement is that this is another move by Western allies to push back on China’s rise in the military and technology arenas. But White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Thursday responded to questions about the AUKUS agreement’s focus on China by insisting that it "is not about any one country," adding that "we do not seek conflict [with China]."

Zhao hinted that the Chinese government may accuse Australia of violating its commitment under the Treaty of Rarotonga, which includes prohibitions on the production, possession or acquisition of nuclear weapons.

That tactic would ignore or misconstrue the fact that the AUKUS deal includes equipping Australia with technology for nuclear propulsion, not nuclear weapons. Both President Joe Biden and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison emphasized that Australia doesn’t seek a nuclear weapon. The three countries will undertake discussions over the next 18 months to figure out how best to deliver the technology, which the U.S. traditionally has only shared with the U.K.
Posted by Besoeker 2021-09-20 09:49|| || Front Page|| [22 views ]  Top

#1 Any thoughts to quit feeding the beast or is that too much of a burden on America's corrupt elite?
Posted by Ulolump Grumble1426 2021-09-20 14:07||   2021-09-20 14:07|| Front Page Top

#2 I have a couple of ideas involving foreign imports that might provide some relief.
Posted by Besoeker 2021-09-20 17:29||   2021-09-20 17:29|| Front Page Top

#3 The headline is rassist
Posted by Jumbo Angaviper3879 2021-09-20 18:43||   2021-09-20 18:43|| Front Page Top

#4 @ #4 - I believe the term is "layciss"
Posted by Bangkok Billy 2021-09-20 19:44||   2021-09-20 19:44|| Front Page Top

#5 Bangkok Billy. Made me laugh. Im embarrassed about it though.
Posted by ruprecht 2021-09-20 20:28||   2021-09-20 20:28|| Front Page Top

09:51 Skidmark
09:48 Skidmark
09:46 Grom the reflective
09:41 Grom the reflective
09:37 Whiskey Mike
09:36 Rex Mundi
09:34 Grom the reflective
09:33 Skidmark
09:32 Whiskey Mike
09:31 Warthog
09:29 Warthog
09:28 Whiskey Mike
09:27 Frank G
09:23 Whiskey Mike
09:14 Besoeker
09:10 Lord Garth
09:08 NN2N1
09:01 Grom the reflective
08:58 Huputle+Cherelet4131
08:56 Grom the reflective
08:52 Huputle+Cherelet4131
08:52 NN2N1
08:49 Grom the reflective
08:46 Grom the reflective









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com