Article

2021-07-28 -Land of the Free

ACLU will represent woman with 'F*** Biden' yard signs

[WashingtonExaminer] Two New Jersey residents who were previously ordered to remove anti-Joe Biden signage from their property will be represented by a local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, according to court filings from Saturday.

Homeowner Patricia Dilascio was ordered on July 15 by Roselle Park Municipal Court Judge Gary Bundy to remove three of 10 flags displayed on her property within a week or face $250-per-day fines despite some flags being owned by her daughter Andrea Dick. The signage featured profanities and insults such as "F*** Biden," "Joe Biden Sucks," "Socialism Sucks, Biden Blows," and "Don't Blame Me I Voted For Trump," among others...
fwiw, obscenity may be regulated but you have to have a lawful procedure to establish the 'when and where and in what manner' of content that is prohibited.

The same sentiments can be expressed without cussing, most assuredly. But what’s sauce for the Left’s Antifa/BLM ought to be sauce for the Right.

Posted by Lord Garth 2021-07-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11135 views ] Top

#1 May be legal but clearly the property owners have no class nor shame.

Posted by Croque Fliting8030 2021-07-28 02:23|| 2021-07-28 02:23|| Front Page Top

#2

Look I don't like biden admin either and the Anti-USA issues surrounding this Socialcrat Junta.

But I am fed up with any open displays of profanity. eg. F**k _____, or Penis and Vagina Photo or graphic art displaying T-shirts, penis mobiles and graphic vehicle art.

Besides the SCOTUS ruled 30+ years ago about community set standards and YES it can be enforced if done so equally and fairly.

Posted by NN2N1 2021-07-28 10:07|| 2021-07-28 10:07|| Front Page Top

#3
I prefer things like this. And they're no vulgar either. No sane judge can entertain anything against them.

Posted by Dron66046 2021-07-28 10:28|| 2021-07-28 10:28|| Front Page Top

#4 New Jersey Trump supporter WINS appeal to keep 'F**k Biden' signs outside her home after state's Supreme Court ruled they're protected by First Amendment

Posted by Skidmark 2021-07-28 12:00|| 2021-07-28 12:00|| Front Page Top

#5 ^And what's going to do when Hunter rings her doorbell and asks "You called mem?"?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2021-07-28 12:10|| 2021-07-28 12:10|| Front Page Top

#6 I hate the vulgarity where kids can see it, but approve the message.

Usually tact goes a long way with messaging. Something this lady doesn't get. You just turned off at least half of potential supporters.

Posted by DarthVader 2021-07-28 13:42|| 2021-07-28 13:42|| Front Page Top

Posted by Snomons Crutle3682 2021-07-28 13:56|| 2021-07-28 13:56|| Front Page Top

#8 The newsworthy bit here is the ACLU actively defending an individual's rights. Last time I can recall that happening was in 1978, that neo-Nazi march in Skokie.

Posted by SteveS 2021-07-28 15:52|| 2021-07-28 15:52|| Front Page Top

#9 I would not trust the ACLU to represent me.

Posted by Shiva Protector of the Hohlraums 2021-07-28 18:55|| 2021-07-28 18:55|| Front Page Top

#10 They'll represent her, badly, and then recommend a plea deal.

Posted by ed in texas 2021-07-28 19:53|| 2021-07-28 19:53|| Front Page Top

#11 New Jersey Supreme Court vacated a municipal judge's decision ordering Andrea Dick, of Roselle Park, to remove profane pro-Trump posters
-- Skid's link in #4

Posted by SteveS 2021-07-28 20:40|| 2021-07-28 20:40|| Front Page Top

#12 That hack Muni Judge should be repeatedly beaten with a copy of the Constitution then stripped of any powers

Posted by Frank G 2021-07-28 20:43|| 2021-07-28 20:43|| Front Page Top

#13 Key question: would she have been persecuted(sic) the same way if she had put up signs saying the same things about Trump?

Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2021-07-28 21:08|| 2021-07-28 21:08|| Front Page Top

03:23 Besoeker
02:05 Grom the Affective
02:04 Grom the Affective
01:26 49 Pan
00:22 EMS Artifact
00:16 Skidmark