|
2021-07-02 Government Corruption
|
|
Arizona Ballot-Harvesting Ban Is Legal, Supreme Court Rules
|
 [THEEPOCHTIMES] Arizona’s ban on ballot-harvesting and out-of-precinct voting does not violate the federal Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court
...the political football known as The Highest Court in the Land, home of penumbrae and emanations...
ruled 6-3 this morning in a closely watched case with implications for future elections.
The court opinion split neatly along ideological and partisan lines with the 6 conservative justices nominated by Republican presidents voting to uphold the state law and the 3 liberal justices voting to strike it down.
The decision reverses a judgment issued by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and comes the week after the Biden administration, the same old faces in slightly different places, the same old ideas, the same old graft
...knaves, footpads, and adjusters employed by the Biden Crime Family. They leave a trail of havoc everywhere they turn their attention, be it the nation's borders, the Keystone XL Pipeline, or epidemics, sometimes on purpose, most times through sheer arrogant ineptitude. They learnt this stuff in college, you know...
filed a lawsuit against Georgia over the state’s new electoral integrity-promoting law claiming it amounts to so-called voter suppression. The state’s Republican governor, Brian Kemp, said the U.S. Department of Justice’s suit was "legally and constitutionally dead wrong."
 Justice Samuel Alito wrote the court’s opinion in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (DNC (If you're white you ain't right! )
...Democrat National Committee, where all those off-the-wall talking points we hear as news stories originate...
), court file 19-1257, and Arizona Republican Party v. DNC, court file 19-1258, which was published July 1. Mark Brnovich is the Republican attorney general of Arizona. Oral arguments took place telephonically March 2 after the Supreme Court decided Oct. 2, 2020, to hear the consolidated case.
The reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965 was at issue in the case.
The Supreme Court today concluded that Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy and the law known as HB 2023 do not violate Section 2 of the VRA. The court also found that HB 2023 was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose. 
|
Posted by Fred 2021-07-02 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [7 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Lord Garth 2021-07-02 00:49||
2021-07-02 00:49||
Front Page
Top
|
|
00:48 Grom the Reflective
|
