Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/19/2024 View Thu 04/18/2024 View Wed 04/17/2024 View Tue 04/16/2024 View Mon 04/15/2024 View Sun 04/14/2024 View Sat 04/13/2024
2021-06-14 Home Front: Politix
New York Times Reports Andrew Weissmann and Robert Mueller Sought, Then Hid, Special Counsel Surveillance of Trump White House Attorney Don McGhan
[The Last Refuge] My headline is what happened, the New York Times headline is massive spin: "Apple Is Said to Have Turned Over Data on Trump’s White House Counsel in 2018".

Notice what the New York Times is doing here. Everything about their article is written to hide, obfuscate and ignore the reality of what their article actually is revealing. Look closely:

"tactics by the Trump Justice Department"? This is far beyond spin, it is an intentional effort at cognitive dissonance. Perhaps this article is written now because the Durham investigation is going to reveal how Mueller and Weissmann conducted investigative surveillance over the Trump White House... Likely, but rather than supposition let’s just go to the reality of the details.

The headline positions Apple as the center, but the real nub of the revelation is that Weissmann and Mueller used the Special Counsel and FBI to conduct surveillance on the White House legal counsel, and his family, while President Donald Trump was in office. Think about that for a moment. Think about it carefully.

Imagine if Donald Trump allies in the DOJ and FBI were conducting surveillance on Joe Biden’s White House legal counsel? The media would go absolutely bonkers... rightfully so; yet, that is exactly what happened when Trump was in office. The intelligence apparatus was weaponized to conduct political surveillance of President Trump, through the White House legal counsel, while he was in office.

THIS IS A MASSIVE issue. Yet the media are downplaying what took place because, well, the stunning abuse of DOJ power is in alignment with their political objectives.

From the article (emphasis mine):

WASHINGTON — Apple told Donald F. McGahn II, the White House counsel to former President Donald J. Trump, last month that the Justice Department had subpoenaed information about an account that belonged to him in February 2018, and that the government barred the company from telling him at the time, according to two people briefed on the matter.

Mr. McGahn’s wife received a similar notice from Apple, said one of the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter.

It is not clear what F.B.I. agents were scrutinizing, nor whether Mr. McGahn was their specific focus. In investigations, agents sometimes compile a large list of phone numbers and email addresses that were in contact with a subject, and seek to identify all those people by using subpoenas to communications companies for any account information like names, computer addresses and credit card numbers associated with them.

Still, the disclosure that agents secretly collected data of a sitting White House counsel is striking as it comes amid a political backlash to revelations about Trump-era seizures of data of reporters and Democrats in Congress for leak investigations. The president’s top lawyer is also a chief point of contact between the White House and the Justice Department.


Notice what the NYT is doing here? They are attempting to blame Trump for a subpoena against his own White House counsel. Crazy level of spin to cloud the real story of what was going on.

What the special counsel was doing in February 2018 was: (1) covering the tracks of the Obama-era political surveillance; (2) trying to retain their own investigative credibility by hiding prior abuses by the DOJ and FBI during that surveillance; (3) continue surveillance of the Trump administration under the auspices of a "Trump-Russia Collusion/Conspiracy" investigation; and (3) build a fraudulent obstruction case against President Trump in order to remove him from office.
Posted by Large and Company9026 2021-06-14 00:00|| || Front Page|| [12 views ]  Top

#1 

We the users need an
"INTERNET PRIVACY BILL OF RIGHTS"
that actually Protects and has meaningful Civil and Legal Repercussions for violators.
Posted by NN2N1 2021-06-14 07:21||   2021-06-14 07:21|| Front Page Top

#2 And you wonder why the DIA didn't share information with these guys.
Posted by Procopius2k 2021-06-14 10:18||   2021-06-14 10:18|| Front Page Top

#3 McGahn was going to be "the adult in the room" who would spill the beans on Trump's misdeeds, according to the media. But then, the media got lots wrong the last 4 years...
Posted by M. Murcek 2021-06-14 12:16||   2021-06-14 12:16|| Front Page Top

#4 I doubt that Mueller was fully aware of what went on in this witch hunt. The other guy (lefty hitman)should have been disbarred long ago for his shenigans.
Posted by JohnQC 2021-06-14 17:07||   2021-06-14 17:07|| Front Page Top

13:48 NoMoreBS
13:40 Frank G
13:40  
13:32 swksvolFF
13:27 EMS Artifact
13:25 Secret Master
13:08 swksvolFF
13:05 mossomo
13:01 mossomo
12:55 swksvolFF
12:52 swksvolFF
12:50 jpal
12:37 JohnQC
12:07 Beldar+Uneter3543
11:57 Super Hose
11:55 Super Hose
11:39 ed in texas
11:37 Deacon+Blues
11:36 ed in texas
11:31 ed in texas
11:30 Deacon+Blues
11:30 Cesare
11:26 ed in texas
11:23 Grom the Reflective









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com