|
2021-05-29 Home Front: Politix
|
|
6th Circuit Issues Stinging Rejection of Biden's Race-Based 'American Rescue Plan'
|
|
Stinging is a good start... [TRENDINGPOLITICS] The Biden administration has sought to racialize the COVID-19 pandemic response, including a restaurant aid program within the American Rescue Plan. A judge just ruled that isn’t going to fly.
The ruling comes by way of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Antonio Vittolo vs. Isabella Casillas Guzman. Guzman’s lawsuit argued that white men are being ’pushed to the back of the line’ for aid in the coronavirus (aka COVID19 or Chinese Plague)
 ...the twenty first century equivalent of bubonic plague, only instead of killing off a third of the population of Europe it kills 3.4 percent of those who notice they have it. It seems to be fond of the elderly, especially Iranian politicians and holy men...
relief program. The lawsuit was directed at U.S. Small Business Association Administrator Isabella Casillas Guzman by Antonio Vitolo, who is the owner of Jake’s Bar and Grill in Harriman, Tennessee. A majority 2-1 decision found that Biden’s race-based litmus test for aid is not legal.
"This case is about whether the government can allocate limited coronavirus relief funds based on the race and sex of the applicants," Judge Thapar ruled. "We hold that it cannot."
"The Small Business Administration has injected explicit racial and ethnic preferences into the priority process," the ruling continued. "Under a regulation that predates the pandemic, the agency presumes certain applicants are socially disadvantaged based solely on their race or ethnicity. Groups that presumptively qualify as socially disadvantaged—and thus get to jump to the front of the line for priority consideration—include ’Black Americans,’ ’Hispanic Americans,’ ’Asian Pacific Americans,’ ’Native Americans,’ and ’Subcontinent Asian Americans.’ If you are in one of these groups, the Small Business Administration assumes you qualify as socially disadvantaged. Indeed, the only way not to qualify is if someone comes forward ’with credible evidence to the contrary’."
As the SBA’s funding proceeded past the initial emergency funding phase, it continued to implement racial and sexual bias in its decisions.
"There is an obvious solution to this of course: The agency can simply fund grants in the order they were received—without regard to priority status, and without regard to the processing head start that many applications received on the basis of race and sex," the ruling noted.
|
Posted by Fred 2021-05-29 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [8 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Glenmore 2021-05-29 00:38||
2021-05-29 00:38||
Front Page
Top
|
|
23:09 Thromoger Whusomp2178
23:05 swksvolFF
22:28 trailing wife
22:27 trailing wife
22:05 SteveS
21:32 Frank G
21:31 trailing wife
20:24 European Conservative
19:50 trailing wife
19:48 Frank G
19:39 trailing wife
18:40 3dc
18:39 3dc
18:38 3dc
18:36 3dc
18:35 3dc
18:33 3dc
18:23 DooDahMan
18:21 DooDahMan
18:16 3dc
17:57 Huputle+Cherelet4131
17:53 SteveS
17:52 SteveS
17:49 lord garth
|
