Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/25/2024 View Wed 04/24/2024 View Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024 View Fri 04/19/2024
2021-05-01 -Land of the Free
States, led by Arizona, ask Supreme Court to intervene in fight over Trump-era rule on immigrants and welfare
[FoxNews] A coalition of Republican states led by Arizona is urging the Supreme Court to intervene in the legal battle over a Trump-era policy that restricted immigrants who are deemed reliant on welfare from receiving green cards -- a policy the Biden administration has since dropped.

The "public charge" rule was introduced in 2019 and expanded the definition of "public charge" as an immigrant who receives one or more designated public benefits for more than 12 months within a 36-month period. Whether an immigrant would be a "public charge" would be considered when they applied for permanent residency in the U.S.

Critics called the rule discriminatory and alleged that it would stop needy immigrants from claiming the benefits they need. The rule was struck down by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but after the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, the Biden administration said it would not seek to defend the rule in court.

Continuing to defend the rule "is neither in the public interest nor an efficient use of limited government resources," the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said in a statement.

"The 2019 public charge rule was not in keeping with our nation's values. It penalized those who access health benefits and other government services available to them," DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in March.

This led a coalition of 11 states to intervene, and they are now petitioning the Supreme Court to accept review of the case and have the case heard in full. With a conservative majority on the court, they are likely to feel like the rule has a shot of being upheld.

"Without any prior warning, the [Biden administration] sprung an unprecedented, coordinated, and multi-court gambit," the petition says. "Through it, they attempted to execute simultaneous, strategic surrenders in all pending appeals involving the Rule."

Joining Arizona in the suit are Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia.

"The Public Charge Rule is a commonsense immigration policy that ensures people seeking green cards or American citizenship are able to work and financially support themselves," Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said in a statement. "If we fail to enforce this rule, which has existed in some form for over 100 years, our emergency assistance programs may no longer be there when Americans need them most."

Brnovich’s office said the validity of the rule should be decided on legal merits. The state has argued that barring welfare-reliant migrants from claiming welfare will save states more than $1 billion a year in welfare payments.

"In particular, the States have important interests in conserving their Medicaid and related social welfare budgets," the petition says. "Providing for the healthcare needs of economically disadvantaged individuals represents a substantial portion of the States’ budgets."

The case is one of a number of challenges launched by Republican attorneys general in recent months when it comes to immigration. While this case deals specifically with legal immigration, a number of others have sought to overturn Biden policies on issues like Immigration and Customs Enforcement priorities and the Remain-in-Mexico policy.
Posted by Skidmark 2021-05-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top

#1 
PREDICTION

5 of the SCOTUS will rule along Political Agenda lines.
3 will rule based on the US Constitution.

And Chief Justice Roberts will side with whoever is in power for personal reasons.
Posted by NN2N1 2021-05-01 06:00||   2021-05-01 06:00|| Front Page Top

#2 Rules? They were implementation of existing laws prior Congresses passed per their authority under Article I. The Constitutional answer is the enforce the law and tell those who object to change the laws if they dislike them.
Posted by Procopius2k 2021-05-01 07:08||   2021-05-01 07:08|| Front Page Top

21:00 Elmaper+McGurque1612
20:12 swksvolFF
20:09 swksvolFF
19:22 Frank G
18:57 swksvolFF
18:42 magpie
17:05 DarthVader
17:02 Procopius2k
16:25 borgboy
16:20 alanc
16:17 alanc
15:12 Skidmark
15:10 Skidmark
15:08 Tom
15:02 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
14:23 Unung the Furry2677
14:11 Unung the Furry2677
14:06 Unung the Furry2677
13:29 DarthVader
13:21 Airandee
13:19 Airandee
13:15 swksvolFF
13:06 swksvolFF
13:04 NoMoreBS









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com