Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/22/2025 View Wed 05/21/2025 View Tue 05/20/2025 View Mon 05/19/2025 View Sun 05/18/2025 View Sat 05/17/2025 View Fri 05/16/2025
2020-12-09 Science & Technology
Trial results show AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine 70% effective
[IsraelTimes] But questions remain about ability to protect those over 55; health officials around the world hope to rely on shot because of its low cost, availability and ease of use

New results on a possible COVID-19 vaccine from Oxford University and AstraZeneca suggest it is safe and about 70% effective, but questions remain about how well it may help protect those over 55 — a key concern for a vaccine that health officials hope to rely on around the world because of its low cost, availability and ease of use.

Still, experts say the vaccine seems likely to be approved, despite some confusion in the results and lower levels of protection than what some other vaccine candidates have shown.

"What we can see looks reasonable, but it’s a bit more complicated than what we’ve seen so far," said Dr. Buddy Creech, a Vanderbilt University researcher helping to test two other vaccines. "If this had been the first report out, the field would have still been excited to have a vaccine."

The medical journal Lancet on Tuesday published partial results from tests of the vaccine in the United Kingdom, Brazil and South Africa — safety results on 23,745 participants and protection levels on 11,636.

They’re hard to interpret because a mistake led some participants to get a half dose followed by a full one rather than two full doses as intended.

Researchers claim the vaccine protected against disease in 62% of those given two full doses and in 90% of those initially given the half dose. However,
by candlelight every wench is handsome...
independent experts have said the second group was too small — 2,741 people — to judge the possible value of that approach and that more testing is needed.

The half-dose group also didn’t include anyone over 55, and among others in the study, only about 12% were in that age group. Older people also were enrolled later, so there hasn’t been enough time to see whether they develop infections at a lower rate than those not given the vaccine.

It’s unclear if the results will be enough to lead regulators in the United Kingdom and elsewhere to approve its use right away.

"We have no safety concerns about the vaccine," with no hospitalizations or severe disease among those who received it, and results from all study locations consistently showing benefit, said one study leader, Oxford’s Andrew Pollard.
Posted by trailing wife 2020-12-09 03:35|| || Front Page|| [11131 views ]  Top

#1 
How MSM will Spin VAX protests and report it
Given the C19 was documented to be far more deadly for the age groups of 60+ and those with existing medical issues.

We just wanted to acknowledge the growing number of generous offers of those Healthy Citizens Groups, least likely to experience seriously illness and possible death if infected.

We are hearing a growing number of reports of Groups offering to forego being VAX'd, until after those more like to be infected and/or die, are first treated.

ACTUALLY IN REAL LIFE
What I am hearing and reading. Is many are very clear that they'll let others be the 1st wave of Lab Rats, then wait and see if there are any issues.

BTW: We have already seen one warning that women and dress up She-He's/He-She's Transgenders (☺) should NOT get pregnant for 2-4 months after being VAX'd.

Which raises a Question?
It took the Phramacy Industry 7-8 months to develop this VAX. Were there miscarriages and deformities discovered in the VAX Testing?
Posted by NN2N1  2020-12-09 05:45||   2020-12-09 05:45|| Front Page Top

#2 OBTW :
If you need to replace your Covid-19 Season 2 VAX card here it is to Dload, print out and fill in the blanks. (with your original data☺)

COVID-19 ID CARD
Posted by NN2N1 2020-12-09 07:15||   2020-12-09 07:15|| Front Page Top

#3 The pregnancy warning may be from an abundance of caution with a new vaccine without widespread testing yet. I gather that miscarriages have been an occasional side effect from some vaccines, but I can't give chapter and verse.
Posted by James the lesser  2020-12-09 07:41|| https://idontknowbut.blogspot.com  2020-12-09 07:41|| Front Page Top

#4 and Moderna and Pfizer are 94-95% effective, so why go with AZ?
Posted by Mercutio 2020-12-09 09:17||   2020-12-09 09:17|| Front Page Top

#5 Moderna and Pfizer are 94-95% effective, so why go with AZ?

(a) According to Moderna and Pfizer. (at least Astra-Zeneca owed up to screwing their tests).
(b) Moderna and Pfizer are mRNA (very experimental) vaccines - which, even if everything goes well*, are not "user-friendly" (you have to keep them refrigerated at - 70 C).

*Eukaryotic cells are NOT build to take up nucleotide compounds (wrapped in lipid membrane, or not) from their surrounding. [I saw an article comparing mRNA vaccines to USB - well, in this metaphor, eukaryotic cells are computers without USB drive]. We don't know that the companies put in their mRNA packages to make the cells take them up without degradation.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-12-09 10:11||   2020-12-09 10:11|| Front Page Top

#6 Were there miscarriages and deformities discovered in the VAX Testing?

Lamiak.
Posted by swksvolFF 2020-12-09 18:20||   2020-12-09 18:20|| Front Page Top

17:49 magpie
15:50 Skidmark
15:50 swksvolFF
15:48 Skidmark
15:46 Skidmark
15:41 Skidmark
15:35 Skidmark
15:25 Skidmark
15:21 illeagle
14:41 Besoeker
14:16 trailing wife
14:12 swksvolFF
14:03 trailing wife
13:55 Skidmark
13:45 Silentbrick
13:40 DarthVader
13:35 swksvolFF
13:20 Skidmark
13:16 Skidmark
13:11 Skidmark
13:02 Skidmark
13:01 Skidmark
12:59 Skidmark
12:52 mossomo









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com