Article

2020-11-12 Home Front: Politix

Dominion Voting Systems denies financial relationship with Dianne Feinstein's husband

[Washington Examiner] Dominion Voting Systems rebuked claims that the company has a financial relationship with the husband of Sen. Dianne Feinstein and that the company manipulated the results of the 2020 election.

"The company has no financial relationship with Mr. Blum," Kay Stimson, Dominion's vice president of government affairs, told the Dispatch. "This is a false claim spread on social media."

Trump legal adviser Sidney Powell said Democrats, including Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum, invested in the voting system company to "steal" elections not only from Republicans but from other Democrats.

Fox News's Maria Bartiromo said that she had seen reports that Blum was a "significant shareholder" in Dominion and that a former chief of staff for Nancy Pelosi is a "key executive."

"They have invested in it for their own reasons and are using it to commit this fraud to steal votes," Powell told Bartiromo during an interview. "I think they’ve even stolen them from other Democrats in their own party, who should be outraged about this also."

Powell said that Democrats "had this all planned" and that they inserted ballots filled out only for apparent President-elect Joe Biden when President Trump's vote tally went too high.

Posted by Besoeker 2020-11-12 06:21|| || Front Page|| [9 views ] Top

#1 What could possibly go wrong with Dominion Voting Systems and Democracy Suite software (sarc)?

Posted by JohnQC 2020-11-12 13:33|| 2020-11-12 13:33|| Front Page Top

#2 Dominion Voting Systems.

Ownership can happen in lots of ways which are not transparent. For example, Blum might invest in some portfolio that contains tech stocks.

It would take a little time to get a profile on the ownership of Dominion. He might donate money to a charity that later gets funneled into Dominion. Maybe money gets donated to ActBlue or the CF and then directed somewhere else. ActBlue is a little sketchy on this distribution. (Not saying it was done. I'm not a CPA or forensics CPA type who audits such things.)

Posted by JohnQC 2020-11-12 13:43|| 2020-11-12 13:43|| Front Page Top

#3 From the Spec Sheet linked to by JohnQC

DATABASES
Microsoft SQL Server 2016Standard 2016 Standard Unmodified COTS EMS Client/Server
SW Component
Microsoft SQL Server 201 Service Pack 2 2016 SP1 Unmodified COTS EMS Client/Server
SW Component
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 SP1 Express 2016 SP1 Unmodified COTS EMS Client/Server
SW Component
SQLite 1.0.103.0 Unmodified COTS EMS SW Platform
Microsoft Access Database Engine 2010 Unmodified COTS EMS Client/Server
SW Component

ENVRONMENTAL VARIABLES
Cumulative Voting
Cumulative VotEing: Voters are permitted to cast, as many votes as there
are seats to be filled for one or more candidates. Voters are not limited
to giving only one vote to a candidate. Instead, they can put multiple
votes on one or more candidate.
NO

The above NO is a boolean value in one of the databases that can easily be changed to YES or if in the source code and be changed to TRUE, recompiled and uploaded to the voting machine.

Posted by Ebbomoger Speaking for Boskone4589 2020-11-12 22:31|| 2020-11-12 22:31|| Front Page Top

#4 *puts on old hat*

I remember back on one of my programming, uhem coding classes, being tasked with creating a Slot Machine Program.

Knowing that the students would ef it, the instructor followed the test with, "Fix It and Why."

I ended up making a program which I could win the 'money' but on a loss, not loose the money.

Granted, this was when Mario was still chasing Peach's skirt, but the programming should be magnificently similar.

Posted by swksvolFF 2020-11-12 22:40|| 2020-11-12 22:40|| Front Page Top