Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/22/2025 View Wed 05/21/2025 View Tue 05/20/2025 View Mon 05/19/2025 View Sun 05/18/2025 View Sat 05/17/2025 View Fri 05/16/2025
2020-08-17 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Mueller Aide Weissmann Calls On DOJ Attorneys Not To Help On Investigations
[JonathanTurley] I recently wrote a column discussing how Democratic leaders, including Vice President Joe Biden, have argued against continuing the investigation by U.S. Attorney John Durham despite growing evidence of misconduct by Justice Department officials and now the first guilty plea by former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith. Now, Andrew Weissmann, one of the top prosecutors with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, has derided the Clinesmith plea while actually calling on Justice Department attorneys to refuse to help on ongoing investigations that could implicate aspects of his own prior work.
What an idiot.
I was among those who expressed concern when Mueller selected Weissmann due to his history of controversial prosecutorial decisions, including a pattern of prosecutorial overreach in the Enron litigation.

Weissmann’s recent statements (made before the release of his new book on the Russian investigation) have only served to reaffirm those concerns.

Recently, Weissmann wrote an extraordinary and disturbing New York Times op-ed (with former Defense Department special counsel Ryan Goodman). In the column, he appeared to call on Justice Department lawyers to undermine the Durham investigation as well as the investigation by U.S. Attorney John Bash’s investigation into the "unmasking" requests by Obama administration officials. They wrote "Justice Department employees in meeting their ethical and legal obligations, should be well advised not to participate in any such effort."

Consider that line for a moment. Weissmann is openly calling on attorneys to refuse to help on investigations that could raise questions about his own decisions. Durham is looking at a pattern errors, false statements, bias, and now criminal conduct in the Russian investigation. There is obviously overlap with the Mueller investigation which discussed many of the same underlying documents and relied on work by some of the same individuals. The failure to address misconduct, bias, or criminal conduct by such individuals would be embarrassing to both Weissmann and Mueller. Despite that obvious conflict of interest, Weissmann is calling on attorneys to stand down.

It is the same troubling position that was once taken by Sally Yates, who told an entire federal agency not to assist the President in his travel ban.

After Weissmann called on Justice Department attorneys not to assist investigations by the Justice Department, Durham disclosed that the first guilty plea would be entered by Clinesmith. That would ordinarily cause embarrassment for someone who was calling for DOJ lawyers to effectively hinder the investigation. Not Weissmann. He has now attacked the criminal plea.

Weissmann mocked Attorney General Bill Barr to explain the difference between the Flynn plea and the Clinesmith plea....

....Weissmann's public effort to derail the Durham investigation and his distortion of the Clinesmith guilty plea only reinforces the view of many of us that the Durham investigation must be completed and made public. Despite saying that I did not believe that Mueller would find crimes of collusion or conspiracy with the Russians, I supported the Special Counsel investigation. I also supported the Horowitz investigation and the Durham investigation. The reason is the same. I believe that the public needs to have a full and transparent account of what happened in the Russian investigation on both sides. Like many, Weissmann would like transparency on only one side and to shutdown the Durham investigation despite Horowitz referring matters for criminal investigation and finding a host of false statements, errs, and professional misconduct. Even the addition of a criminal plea has not stopped Weissmann from denouncing this investigation.

For years, I have criticized Weissmann's record of dubious prosecutorial judgment, bias, and overreach. However, that case against Weissmann is not nearly as powerful as the case he is making against himself.
Posted by Clem 2020-08-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11127 views ]  Top

#1 Sometimes events need no additional looking into or investigation.

[sarc off]
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-17 01:57||   2020-08-17 01:57|| Front Page Top

#2 RedState - Never underestimate the duplicity of Andrew Weissmann in efforts to cover his own tracks and throw off the scent of ethical hounds pursuing him.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-17 02:16||   2020-08-17 02:16|| Front Page Top

#3 Always viewed Turley as an honest jurist who calls balls n strikes. He's been right on the money on this Mueller/Collusion BS.
Posted by Bangkok Billy 2020-08-17 05:53||   2020-08-17 05:53|| Front Page Top

#4 Tools of the left:

American Thinker - The media are dangerously misleading the electorate
Posted by Besoeker 2020-08-17 07:01||   2020-08-17 07:01|| Front Page Top

#5 Andrew Weissman, a weasel's weasel - I hope he gets bent over and drilled hard.
Posted by Raj 2020-08-17 10:08||   2020-08-17 10:08|| Front Page Top

#6 Weissmann obstructing justice? Durham getting close to Weissmann and he's worried about disbarment and jail time?
Posted by JohnQC 2020-08-17 10:32||   2020-08-17 10:32|| Front Page Top

#7 I hope Weissmann, et al., get reamed with a roto-rooter, but with Durham and Barr around, I have zero expectations.
Posted by Clem 2020-08-17 11:05||   2020-08-17 11:05|| Front Page Top

#8 Trey Gowdy rips mainstream media for ignoring ex-FBI lawyer's expected guilty plea
Posted by Skidmark 2020-08-17 11:23||   2020-08-17 11:23|| Front Page Top

#9 ^Maybe because they don't believe there is going to be one?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-08-17 11:26||   2020-08-17 11:26|| Front Page Top

#10 Once I saw blowhard Trey Gowdy's name, I went to the next post.
Posted by Clem 2020-08-17 11:30||   2020-08-17 11:30|| Front Page Top

#11 Imagine if we had a Republican-controlled Senate that would confirm Trump replacements for all the dug-in Obama leftovers that Weismann is signalling.

Oh well...
Posted by charger 2020-08-17 14:34||   2020-08-17 14:34|| Front Page Top

#12 So, a sworn officer of the court is publicly recomending that other sworn officers ignore lawful court orders.
We've stopped pretending, haven't we?
Posted by ed in texas 2020-08-17 15:28||   2020-08-17 15:28|| Front Page Top

15:50 Skidmark
15:50 swksvolFF
15:48 Skidmark
15:46 Skidmark
15:41 Skidmark
15:35 Skidmark
15:25 Skidmark
15:21 illeagle
14:41 Besoeker
14:16 trailing wife
14:12 swksvolFF
14:03 trailing wife
13:55 Skidmark
13:45 Silentbrick
13:40 DarthVader
13:35 swksvolFF
13:20 Skidmark
13:16 Skidmark
13:11 Skidmark
13:02 Skidmark
13:01 Skidmark
12:59 Skidmark
12:52 mossomo
12:51 Skidmark









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com