|
2020-06-22 Fifth Column
|
|
Democrats move to block Trump’s troop cut plan in Germany
|
 [Stars and Stripes] Democratic lawmakers have introduced legislation that would block President Donald Trump’s push to withdraw nearly 10,000 troops from Germany, warning that such a move would have catastrophic security consequences for the U.S. and benefit America’s adversaries.
| President Trump’s superpower: to make Democrats and NeverTrumpers demand the exact opposite of their long-stated positions because they can’t stop hating him long enough to think. |
“President Trump’s disastrous decision to withdraw thousands of troops from and reduce the total force cap in Germany endangers our national security,” the chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee, Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., said in a statement Thursday, when he and Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., proposed the legislation.
| More posturing by House Democrats. Once again they’re puffing some thing that will be dead on arrival in the Senate, hoping to fool the rubes. |
Menendez, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Russian President Vladimir Putin would benefit from the proposed drawdown.
“The current U.S. troop presence in Germany is in the U.S. national security interest. Full stop,” he said in a statement. “This drawdown weakens America and Europe. And Vladimir Putin understands and appreciates that better than anyone.”
The Russian Foreign Ministry last week welcomed the plan to withdraw more than a quarter of U.S. troops from Germany, saying it would help bolster security in Europe.
The legislation proposed by the Democrats would deny funding for force level reductions in Europe unless the cuts were requested by a host nation government. It would also require that 180 days’ notice be given for planned drawdowns in Europe, and that the secretaries of defense and state testify before Congress within 14 days of a proposed troop cut being announced.
Read that part again:"would deny funding for force level reductions in Europe unless the cuts were requested by a host nation government". So what these idiot anti-Trumpers are doing is giving a foreign government veto power over CiC moves to better deploy troops, punish "allies" who don't align policy or ops with us, don't meet their defense commitments, or actively court our enemies, by, say purchasing S-400 systems from the Russians. Unconstitutional infringement on Executive powers as CiC
On Monday, Trump confirmed that he wants to reduce the number of troops in Germany by 9,500, and tied the proposed cut to his dissatisfaction with Berlin over the amount of money it spends on defense.
Trump has repeatedly complained that Germany is falling short of its commitment to NATO to spend at least 2% of GDP on its military.
Both Republicans and Democrats have aired concerns over the proposed troop cuts in Germany. More than 20 Republican lawmakers urged President Donald Trump earlier this month to reject the plan, saying the move would weaken the NATO alliance and encourage Russian aggression.
Before Russia’s 2014 incursion into Ukraine and the annexation of the Crimean Peninsula, it was routine for both Democratic and Republican lawmakers to complain about the number of troops in Europe and call for forces to return to the United States.
But Russia’s move on Ukraine changed that, and in recent years, efforts to strengthen the U.S. military presence in Europe have enjoyed bipartisan support.
It isn’t clear when Trump intends to execute his directive or which military units would be affected. Proponents of current force levels argue that a large reduction would hinder operations beyond Germany, since troops based there support efforts in places like the Baltics, Middle East and Africa.
The Pentagon, which appears to have been blindsided by Trump’s decision, has been mum on the issue. U.S. European Command also has declined to comment, referring questions to the National Security Council in Washington.
|
Posted by 3dc 2020-06-22 00:35||
||
Front Page|| [11136 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Victor Emmanuel Grundy3291 2020-06-22 00:51||
2020-06-22 00:51||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by SteveS 2020-06-22 00:53||
2020-06-22 00:53||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Victor Emmanuel Grundy3291 2020-06-22 00:53||
2020-06-22 00:53||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by M. Murcek 2020-06-22 01:34||
2020-06-22 01:34||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Marilyn Tojo7566 2020-06-22 01:51||
2020-06-22 01:51||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Besoeker 2020-06-22 01:59||
2020-06-22 01:59||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Clem 2020-06-22 06:45||
2020-06-22 06:45||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Frank G 2020-06-22 07:37||
2020-06-22 07:37||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by M. Murcek 2020-06-22 07:45||
2020-06-22 07:45||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Cesare 2020-06-22 07:56||
2020-06-22 07:56||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Procopius2k 2020-06-22 07:59||
2020-06-22 07:59||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by M. Murcek 2020-06-22 08:09||
2020-06-22 08:09||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by DarthVader 2020-06-22 09:07||
2020-06-22 09:07||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by magpie 2020-06-22 10:56||
2020-06-22 10:56||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Mullah Richard 2020-06-22 11:21||
2020-06-22 11:21||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-06-22 11:39||
2020-06-22 11:39||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Alaska Paul 2020-06-22 12:14||
2020-06-22 12:14||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Bob Grorong1136 2020-06-22 14:17||
2020-06-22 14:17||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-06-22 14:32||
2020-06-22 14:32||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Abu Uluque 2020-06-22 14:53||
2020-06-22 14:53||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by charger 2020-06-22 16:01||
2020-06-22 16:01||
Front Page
Top
|
|
05:11 NN2N1
04:50 NN2N1
04:24 Grom the Affective
04:14 Grom the Affective
04:09 Grom the Affective
03:49 Grom the Affective
03:40 Grom the Affective
02:50 Pancho Poodle8452
02:30 Grom the Affective
01:28 Grom the Affective
01:28 Grom the Affective
01:23 Grom the Affective
01:22 Grom the Affective
01:05 Frank G
00:57 Frank G
00:25 DooDahMan
00:18 Bobby
00:16 Skidmark
00:13 Bobby
00:12 Skidmark
00:05 Frank G
|
