Article

2020-06-05 Home Front: Politix

Grassley blocks nominees over Trump's inspector general firings

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley on Thursday said he would seek to block two of Donald Trump’s nominees in response to the president’s firing of two inspectors general, citing the need for "checks and balances."

Grassley has been pressing the White House to provide a rationale for Trump’s decision to dismiss the intelligence community’s inspector general and his counterpart at the State Department, and has said responses from the White House have fallen short.

In statements submitted to the congressional record, Grassley said he would block any request for unanimous consent in the Senate to approve Christopher Miller to head the National Counterterrorism Center without an explanation for Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson’s dismissal.

Similarly, he said he would seek to block approval of the nomination of Marshall Billingslea to be an undersecretary at the State Department absent an explanation for the termination of State Department Inspector General Steve Linick.

Agency inspectors general are charged with guarding against illegal conduct and mismanagement.

Their job is meant to be nonpartisan, but a president has a right to remove them for any reason. U.S. law requires a president to notify Congress within 30 days of such action.

Linick became the fourth government watchdog dismissed by the Republican president in recent months when he was fired on May 15, leading to charges from Democrats that Trump was moving against internal critics.

In an interview with members of Congress on Wednesday, Linick confirmed he was fired while investigating the declaration of a "national emergency" to justify arms sales to Saudi Arabia, lawmakers said.

"All I want is a reason 4 (for) firing these ppl (people)," Grassley said in a tweet.

Posted by 746 2020-06-05 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11134 views ] Top

#1 Grassley has been pressing the White House to provide a rationale for Trump’s decision to dismiss the intelligence community’s inspector general and his counterpart at the State Department, and has said responses from the White House have fallen short.

A better question would be: "What role did these IGs have in the coup to take down POTUS?"

Posted by JohnQC 2020-06-05 08:54|| 2020-06-05 08:54|| Front Page Top

#2 Linick, appointed to his post in September 2013, oversaw the cover-up of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server.
His May 2016 report was critical of Clinton,noting the Secretary failed to inform key department staff regarding her use of a private server. No punishment resulted.

Posted by b 2020-06-05 09:34|| 2020-06-05 09:34|| Front Page Top

#3 C'mon, Chuck. You know better than that. Any Intel IG who didn't blow the whistle years ago needs to get his ass canned.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2020-06-05 10:54|| 2020-06-05 10:54|| Front Page Top

#4 Who, exactly, is his constituency for this move?

Posted by Iblis 2020-06-05 12:10|| 2020-06-05 12:10|| Front Page Top

#5 Who, exactly, is his constituency for this move?

Personal ego. Chuck, not Trump, is the BMOC.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2020-06-05 22:54|| 2020-06-05 22:54|| Front Page Top

12:05 Skidmark
11:52 Skidmark
11:43 Difar Dave
11:41 Super Hose
11:39 Super Hose
11:33 DooDahMan
11:31 Crusader
11:30 Abu Uluque
11:28 swksvolFF
10:54 Procopius2k
10:21 swksvolFF
10:16 Frank G
10:15 Jefe101
10:14 Jairong+Scourge+of+the+Gepids2435
09:52 trailing wife
09:40 trailing wife
09:25 trailing wife
09:17 Procopius2k
09:16 Procopius2k
09:14 Procopius2k
09:10 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
08:50 Bobby
08:24 Super Hose
08:14 Super Hose