2020-05-29 Science & Technology
|
Why Does the CDC Think the COVID-19 Fatality Rate Is So Low, and Why Won't It Tell Anyone?
|
NR via Instapundit
Last week I was searching the Internet for some COVID-19 statistic or other, and I came across a new CDC website. The site featured some numbers the federal government is using to model the spread of the epidemic. One in particular caught my eye: 0.4 percent, the "current best estimate" of the disease’s "case fatality rate." The document also said that 35 percent of infections are asymptomatic, which suggests the infection fatality rate is just 0.26 percent.
These numbers struck me as low for several reasons. For one thing, the virus has already killed 0.2 percent of all New Yorkers, and obviously a much higher percentage of those who’ve actually been infected in the city. For another, if we’ve had 100,000 deaths nationwide and a CFR of 0.4 percent, that means we’ve had 25 million symptomatic cases; including cases without symptoms, more than 10 percent of the entire country has been infected, which seems out of sync with what we’re hearing from serology tests. Individual studies and reviews of the evidence tend to put the infection fatality rate somewhere around 0.5 to 1 percent, though there’s at least one dissenting review that puts it lower (while managing not to include any studies finding a fatality rate above 0.5 percent, of which there are plenty).
I put out a tweet expressing my confusion, and things spiraled quickly, as they often do on social media. A follower alerted the prominent biologist Carl Bergstrom, who wrote a thread criticizing the CDC’s numbers. The next morning he was featured in a CNN story about the issue. There have been many media reports since, with the narrative predictably varying from "Heroic Scientific Experts Hammer Corrupt CDC for Fake Low Fatality Rate" to "CDC Finally Admits COVID Is Basically Harmless." (I exaggerate, but only a little.)
I don’t have a scorching hot take on the number. But I do want to know where it comes from, which is not clear from the site itself. It says the information is based on data about a month old and names the source "Preliminary COVID-19 estimates, CDC," which I have not been able to locate (if indeed it refers to a specific document at all).
I have contacted the CDC several times in the past week to no avail. Both the Center for Public Integrity and BuzzFeed similarly report that they sought comment and received no reply.
If the fatality rate of this thing is 0.26 percent, that is fantastic news. If the CDC has evidence this is the case, it should share it with the rest of us.
I've two theories:
(a) CDC, who are a bunch of shithead bureaucrats, surrendered to the anti-locker hysterics (who, IMO, cannot see beyond the damage to their own finances - or, in many cases simply can cope with the discomfort of lock-down. Or, worst case scenario - simply idiots who adopted a particular stance and can't admit they were wrong).
(b) CDC is acting out a deep eugenic conspiracy. Once the lock-up is over, and given that covid-hoax morons are fond of gallivanting around sans masks (probably lick door handles too), there will be a second wave - bigger than the first. And then, the screws will be tightened.
Ridiculous? No more ridiculous that the arguments (destroyed economy, millions of young lives permanently blasted, doesn't hurt people under 65) we heard here from anti-lockers.
|
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-05-29 03:13||
||
Front Page|| [11128 views ]
Top
|
Posted by Woodrow 2020-05-29 03:53||
2020-05-29 03:53||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Dale 2020-05-29 06:20||
2020-05-29 06:20||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Airandee 2020-05-29 06:26||
2020-05-29 06:26||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2020-05-29 06:34||
2020-05-29 06:34||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Clem 2020-05-29 07:17||
2020-05-29 07:17||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Bobby 2020-05-29 08:37||
2020-05-29 08:37||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by rjschwarz 2020-05-29 09:40||
2020-05-29 09:40||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by rjschwarz 2020-05-29 09:41||
2020-05-29 09:41||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Besoeker 2020-05-29 09:41||
2020-05-29 09:41||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by USN, Ret. 2020-05-29 09:46||
2020-05-29 09:46||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Glenmore 2020-05-29 10:58||
2020-05-29 10:58||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-05-29 11:18||
2020-05-29 11:18||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by European Conservative 2020-05-29 11:25||
2020-05-29 11:25||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-05-29 11:32||
2020-05-29 11:32||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by European Conservative 2020-05-29 11:34||
2020-05-29 11:34||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-05-29 11:38||
2020-05-29 11:38||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by European Conservative 2020-05-29 11:40||
2020-05-29 11:40||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-05-29 11:52||
2020-05-29 11:52||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Dale 2020-05-29 12:34||
2020-05-29 12:34||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Klem Kadiddlehopper 2020-05-29 12:49||
2020-05-29 12:49||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by swksvolFF 2020-05-29 13:34||
2020-05-29 13:34||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by European Conservative 2020-05-29 13:39||
2020-05-29 13:39||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by swksvolFF 2020-05-29 14:17||
2020-05-29 14:17||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by European Conservative 2020-05-29 15:00||
2020-05-29 15:00||
Front Page
Top
|
Posted by Marilyn Tojo7566 2020-05-29 18:20||
2020-05-29 18:20||
Front Page
Top
|
|
12:22 Abu Uluque
12:19 Abu Uluque
12:17 Abu Uluque
12:17 Skidmark
12:15 Abu Uluque
12:11 Skidmark
12:01 Crusader
11:55 Grom the Affective
11:52 Crusader
11:50 Crusader
11:40 swksvolFF
11:11 HeavyG
11:10 Angstrom
11:07 HeavyG
11:07 Angstrom
11:06 DarthVader
11:05 HeavyG
10:58 alanc
09:43 Mullah Richard
09:27 Warthog
09:11 Mercutio
09:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
08:52 Matt
08:24 Matt









|