Article

2020-03-30 Home Front: Culture Wars

FDA issues emergency authorization of 2 anti-malaria drugs for coronavirus treatment

(CNN) ‐ The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued an emergency use authorization for chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine to treat patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
Governor Half-Witmer of MI? STFU
The drugs ‐ which are used to treat malaria and other conditions ‐ have been called game changers by President Donald Trump.

But thus far, there is little scientific evidence that chloroquine, or its closely-related analogue hydroxychloroquine, are effective in treating Covid-19.

What happened? The authorization came in a letter dated Saturday, but the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) acknowledged the FDA's action in a Sunday news release. The FDA limited the scope of its authorization to drugs supplied from the Strategic National Stockpile. The HHS announced that two pharmaceutical companies ‐ Bayer and a division of Novartis ‐ had donated the drugs to the stockpile.
Do the drugs work? In its statement, HHS said:

"Anecdotal reports suggest that these drugs may offer some benefit in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
"The safety profile of these drugs has only been studied for FDA approved indications, not COVID-19."

While there's limited evidence on the efficacy of chloroquine, or hydroxychloroquine, the FDA said the drugs' benefits outweighed their risk. In its letter, the FDA encouraged randomized clinical trials that could assess the effectiveness of the drugs. It also noted that the known and potential benefits outweigh the risks.

Who can the drugs be used to treat? The authorization is limited to patients who are currently hospitalized and weigh at least 50kg, or about 110 pounds. Under the emergency use authorization, health care providers must contact their local or state health department to access the drugs.

Posted by Iblis 2020-03-30 11:26|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ] Top

#1 I thought these drugs were already being used in various places? There ought to be some clinical data at this point to give some indication of their efficacy. There ought to be other data that could give some indication of their positive effects. For example, in approved prescribed uses of the drugs for lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren's disease and malaria, how many of these people get COVID-19? If the figure is very low, or nil, then one might be able to assume the drugs are preventive or curative for CV-19 without controlled clinical trials.

Posted by JohnQC 2020-03-30 15:22|| 2020-03-30 15:22|| Front Page Top

#2 It was being used off label (potential liability issues) and under compassionate use exception, which means you had to wait until the patient was at death's door. Now doctors can prescribe it with a positive test for COVID-19 when it's most effective.

French have concluded 2 studies, both showing high safety and efficacy. But studies take time, and it's never enough. People will argue n, p values, need for follow up, etc for years. That's fine, but maybe not the ideal way to respond to a crisis.

Posted by Iblis 2020-03-30 15:50|| 2020-03-30 15:50|| Front Page Top

14:55 NN2N1
14:09 Grom the Affective
14:04 Super Hose
14:02 Super Hose
13:37 Procopius2k
13:35 Grom the Affective
13:34 Procopius2k
13:27 Grom the Affective
13:21 NN2N1
13:18 Grom the Affective
12:50 Remoteman
12:45 Secret Master
12:24 Matt
12:07 Abu Uluque
12:03 Grom the Affective
11:59 Grom the Affective
11:35 Super Hose
11:33 Super Hose
11:29 Besoeker
11:28 Besoeker
11:28 Super Hose
11:27 Besoeker
11:23 Besoeker
11:22 Grom the Affective