Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025
2020-02-26 Government
The Case for Closing the Pentagon
[Politico] The Pentagon, famed as the world’s largest office building, sits on 24 acres of land across the Potomac River from Washington. Home to 3.7 million square feet of offices, it was constructed during the Second World War. In anticipation of the military shrinking once peace returned, the building was designed to be easily converted into a records storage center. Instead, if the Trump administration’s budget is approved, in 2021 it will oversee the largest defense expenditure since 1945.

This history makes the Pentagon a potent symbol of America’s foreign-policy infrastructure in general, which is dominated by a massive, increasingly inefficient military machine better suited to the challenges of the mid-20th century than the early 21st. It is a machine that carries considerable direct economic costs but, more important, overshadows other foreign-policy tools more effective in confronting the global problems that the United States faces today. And just as the Pentagon is no longer fit for its backup purpose of records storage center in an age of cloud computing, nor is the Department of Defense well-placed to readjust to new roles, such as anti-terror or cybersecurity, let alone responding to climate change, pandemic threats or global financial crises.

So, as the 2020 race heats up, presidential contenders should talk big and be specific. While some candidates, including Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have said they’d cut defense and shift U.S. foreign policy away from military engagement, they have been light on specifics. But the United States needs a dramatic overhaul to adapt to the global threats of the 21st century, which should include moving away from military engagement and toward international cooperation on issues from peacekeeping to greenhouse gas reduction to global health to banking reform. Such an overhaul should also include cutting the defense budget in half by 2035, and perhaps even getting rid of the Pentagon itself. (Maybe Amazon could move in.)

The Department of Defense was created to win wars against nations that threatened the United States. That is still its major role: Of the Pentagon budget, 71 percent goes to research, development, testing, procurement, operation and maintenance, mostly of large weapons systems designed to defeat other countries’ military forces.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-02-26 02:39|| || Front Page|| [11136 views ]  Top

#1 Taking military advice from a global welfare redistribution think tank will work out well.

How about returning the Department of Defense to the Department of War? Remind them and Death to America screamers of their function to destroy America's enemies, not be the global Meals on Wheels.
Posted by Count Galeazzo Untervehr7098 2020-02-26 03:40||   2020-02-26 03:40|| Front Page Top

#2 My father worked out of OCAMA, 'Plans & Programs' office at Tinker AFB in Oklahoma, and when he came back from visiting the Pentagon always said the place left a bad taste in his mouth. That was back in the early 70's so doubtless it has only gotten worse with the lack of Global Thermonuclear War™ with the Soviets to keep the bureaucrats focused on something other than empire building.
Posted by magpie 2020-02-26 14:42||   2020-02-26 14:42|| Front Page Top

#3 First thing you discover about the 'Five Sided Nut' is that it is NOT run by the military.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-02-26 14:51||   2020-02-26 14:51|| Front Page Top

#4 And just as the Pentagon is no longer fit for its backup purpose of records storage center in an age of cloud computing,



Just trust the SJW codebros with all our military data. It'll be fine.




nor is the Department of Defense well-placed to readjust to new roles, such as anti-terror or cybersecurity, let alone responding to climate change, pandemic threats or global financial crises.

Prime the pump with scrip?

I see no specifics from this person to back up his bald assertions.

Of course, none of this is to say that the military is ready to deal with all possible scenarios--but what does shutting down the Pentagon have to do with it?

If there's a problem, it's personnel, not architecture.
Posted by charger 2020-02-26 20:03||   2020-02-26 20:03|| Front Page Top

14:31 NoMoreBS
14:16 NoMoreBS
14:15 NoMoreBS
14:04 swksvolFF
13:47 Regular joe
13:43 swksvolFF
13:38 swksvolFF
13:34 swksvolFF
13:31 Abu Uluque
13:25 Heribertus Vedente
13:24 mossomo
13:20 Abu Uluque
13:14 mossomo
13:06 swksvolFF
12:51 Grom the Affective
12:31 Abu Uluque
12:20 swksvolFF
12:17 Abu Uluque
12:08 swksvolFF
12:08 ed in texas
12:05 ed in texas
12:01 ed in texas
12:00 ed in texas
11:58 ed in texas









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com