Article

2020-02-03 Afghanistan

TASHKENT, Uzbekistan (AP) ‐ U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday demanded "demonstrable evidence" from the Taliban that they can and will reduce violence before signing a deal that would lead to Afghanistan peace talks and a withdrawal of American troops from the country.

Speaking at a news conference in neighboring Uzbekistan, Pompeo said a deal is close but that they have been close before and failed because the Taliban was unable to demonstrate seriousness. He said more work remains to be done so that peace talks can get started.

"We’re working on a peace and reconciliation plan, putting the commas in the right place, getting the sentences right," he said. "We got close once before to having an agreement: a piece of paper that we mutually executed and the Taliban were unable to demonstrate either their will or capacity or both to deliver on a reduction in violence."

"So, what we are demanding now is demonstrable evidence of their will and capacity to reduce violence, to take down the threat, so the inter-Afghan talks ... will have a less violent context," he said. "We’re hopeful we can achieve that but we’re not there yet, and work certainly remains."

Pompeo’s comments came just two days after U.S. peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad arrived in Kabul and told Afghan President Ashraf Ghani there has been "no notable progress" in talks with the Taliban. However, Khalilzad said he was hopeful of reaching an understanding with them on a reduction of hostilities, without offering any time frame.

Khalilzad had been in Pakistan last week to rally support for getting an agreement with the Taliban to reduce their attacks, as a first step toward a peace agreement to end 18 years of war in neighboring Afghanistan.

Earlier, the Taliban said they offered Khalilzad a 10-day cease-fire window in which to sign a peace agreement that would be followed by intra-Afghan negotiations.

Posted by Besoeker 2020-02-03 05:43|| || Front Page|| [11139 views ] Top
File under: Taliban

#1 Since those at the peace talks only represent one branch of the Taliban, never mind all the other groups infesting the landscape for the purpose of killing any who oppose them ruling that particular neighbourhood, including native warlord types, it is simply impossible for the Taliban in question to reduce overall violence in Afghanistan. So there’s that.

Posted by trailing wife 2020-02-03 11:18|| 2020-02-03 11:18|| Front Page Top

#2 It's like the old frontier. Chiefs were nominal leaders not in the sense of the Western Civ concept of leaders. Negotiating with them didn't necessarily obligate members of the 'tribe' to adhere or follow the agreed aspects of 'treaties'. Besides, as long as Pakistan is still here, there will be no peace.

Posted by Procopius2k 2020-02-03 11:32|| 2020-02-03 11:32|| Front Page Top

#3 Besides, as long as Pakistan is still here, there will be no peace.

Well, that and the poppies.

Posted by Mullah Richard 2020-02-03 11:42|| 2020-02-03 11:42|| Front Page Top

#4 Well Procopius2k, speaking of following the peace treaties. I can't say that I blame them.

Posted by Texhooey 2020-02-03 21:16|| 2020-02-03 21:16|| Front Page Top

12:22 Abu Uluque
12:19 Abu Uluque
12:17 Abu Uluque
12:17 Skidmark
12:15 Abu Uluque
12:11 Skidmark
12:01 Crusader
11:55 Grom the Affective
11:52 Crusader
11:50 Crusader
11:40 swksvolFF
11:11 HeavyG
11:10 Angstrom
11:07 HeavyG
11:07 Angstrom
11:06 DarthVader
11:05 HeavyG
10:58 alanc
09:43 Mullah Richard
09:27 Warthog
09:11 Mercutio
09:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
08:52 Matt
08:24 Matt