|
2020-02-01 Home Front: Politix
|
|
When Iran Took Americans Hostage, Bernie Backed Iran's Defenders
|
 [Daily Beast] As Democrat Socialists condemned Khomeini's hostage taking, Sanders stood with a communist party that condemned "Carter's war drive against the Iranian people."
Bernie Sanders, a top competitor in the Democratic primaries, has attacked Joe Biden for bringing "just a lot of baggage" into the race. But if past views are a major consideration, consider the baggage that Sanders drags into the campaign.
Go back over 40 years, to the start of Iran's long conflict with the United States. On April 1, 1979, the theocratic Islamic Republic of Iran was proclaimed. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who had returned to Iran from exile to assume command of the revolt, became Supreme Leader in December of that year. His rise was accelerated by the seizure on Nov. 4 of 52 American diplomats and citizens, and citizens of other countries, at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. The hostage crisis became the means by which the Ayatollah crushed political opponents in Iran. Dealing with the hostage taking became the overwhelming political crisis for President Jimmy Carter. It lasted 444 days.
Virtually all Americans‐Democrats, Republicans and independents‐united in support of the hostages and the international call for their freedom. One prominent political figure on the 2020 stage, then almost completely unknown, stood apart by joining a Marxist-Leninist party that not only pledged support for the Iranian theocracy, but also justified the hostage taking by insisting the hostages were all likely CIA agents. Who was that person? It was Bernie Sanders.
Sanders would like the public to believe, as an AP story put it, that "democratic socialism [is] the economic philosophy that has guided his political career." But that has not always been the case. In 1977, he left the tiny left-wing Liberty Union Party of Vermont that he'd co-founded, and in 1980 instead aligned himself with the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), the self-proclaimed Trotskyist revolutionary party, became its presidential elector in Vermont, and campaigned for its candidates and platform that defended the Iranian hostage seizure.
In fact, the SWP's position on Iran is part of what distinguishes it from democratic socialist groups. When its presidential candidate, Andrew Pulley, came to speak at the University of Vermont in October 1980, Sanders chaired the meeting. Pulley attracted only 40 students to his rally, where he concentrated, according to the SWP's newspaper The Militant, "on the Iran-Iraq war," and condemned "anti-Iranian hysteria around the U.S. hostages." Military action against Iran was not at that point theoretical‐Pulley's speech came six months after the attempt to free the hostages in Operation Eagle Claw had failed.
In his standard stump speech, Pulley condemned "Carter's war drive against the Iranian people," and said that the U.S. "was on the brink of war with Iran," which would be fought "to protect the oil and banking interests of the Rockefellers and other billionaires." Americans, he predicted, would soon "pay on the battlefields with our very own lives." Their criticism of the Ayatollah was intended "to get us ready for war." And, Pulley charged, the media who criticized those of us who were against "American imperialism" were "declared insane." As for the hostages, Pulley said "we can be sure that many of them are simply spies... or people assigned to protect the spies." 
|
Posted by Frank G 2020-02-01 11:13||
||
Front Page|| [15 views ]
Top
File under: Commies
|
|
Posted by Lex 2020-02-01 13:55||
2020-02-01 13:55||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by DooDahMan 2020-02-01 14:09||
2020-02-01 14:09||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by AlanC 2020-02-01 17:24||
2020-02-01 17:24||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Frank G 2020-02-01 17:32||
2020-02-01 17:32||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Marilyn Tojo7566 2020-02-01 22:14||
2020-02-01 22:14||
Front Page
Top
|
|
01:38 Grom the Reflective
00:17 EMS Artifact
|
