Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2019-11-13 Home Front: Politix
10 reasons why this impeachment ‘inquiry' is really a coup
VDH, as usual cuts through the bullshit
[NY Post] There are at least 10 reasons why the Dem impeachment "inquiry" is really a coup.

1) Impeachment 24/7. The "inquiry," supposedly prompted by President Trump's Ukrainian call, is only the most recent coup seeking to overturn the 2016 election.


Continued from Page 6


Usually, the serial futile attempts ‐ with the exception of the Mueller debacle ‐ were characterized by about a month of media hysteria. We remember the voting-machines-fraud hoax, the Logan Act, the Emoluments Clause, the 25th Amendment, the McCabe-Rosenstein faux coup and various Michael Avenatti–Stormy Daniels–Michael Cohen psychodramas. Ukraine, then, isn't unique, but simply another mini-coup.

2) False whistleblowers. The "whistleblower" is no whistleblower by any common definition of the noun. He has no incriminating documents, no information at all. He doesn't even have firsthand evidence of wrongdoing.

Instead, the whistleblower relied on secondhand water-cooler gossip about a leaked presidential call. Even his mangled version of the call didn't match that of official transcribers.

He wasn't disinterested but had a long history of partisanship. He was a protégé of many of Trump's most adamant opponents, including Susan Rice, John Brennan and Joe Biden. He did not follow protocol by going first to the inspector general but instead caucused with the staff of Rep. Adam Schiff's impeachment inquiry. Neither the whistleblower nor his doppelganger Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman was bothered by the activities of the Bidens or by the Obama decision not to arm Ukraine. Their outrage, in other words, was not about Ukraine but over Trump.

3) First-term impeachment. The Clinton and Nixon inquiries were directed at second-term presidencies, when there were no more electoral remedies for alleged wrongdoing. By contrast, Trump is up for election in less than a year. Impeachment, then, seems a partisan exercise in either circumventing a referendum election or in damaging a president seeking reelection.

4) No special-counsel finding. In the past, special counsels have found felonious presidential behavior, such as cited in Leon Jaworski's and Ken Starr's investigations. By contrast, special counsel Robert Mueller spent 22 months and $35 million, and yet his largely partisan law and investigative team found no "collusion" and no actionable presidential obstruction of that non-crime.

5) No bipartisanship. There was broad bipartisan support for the Nixon impeachment inquiry and even some for the Clinton impeachment. There is none for the Schiff impeachment effort.

6) No high crimes or misdemeanors. There is no proof of any actual crime. Asking a foreign head of state to look into past corruption is pro forma. That Joe Biden is now Trump's potential rival doesn't exculpate possible wrongdoing in his past as vice president, when his son used the Biden name for lucrative gain.

In other words, it is certainly not a crime for a president to adopt his own foreign policy to fit particular countries nor to request of a foreign government with a history of corruption seeking US aid to ensure that it has not in the past colluded with prior US officials in suspicious activity.

7) Thought crimes? Even if there were ever a quid, there is no quo: Unlike the case of the Obama administration, the Trump administration did supply arms to Ukraine, and the Ukrainians apparently did not reinvestigate the Bidens.

8) Double standards. There is now no standard of equality under the law. Instead, we are entering the jurisprudence of junta politics. If an alleged quid pro quo is an impeachable offense, should Biden have been impeached or indicted for clearly leveraging the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor for dubious reasons by threats of withholding US aid?

9) The Schiff factor. Schiff is now de facto chief impeachment prosecutor. He has repeatedly lied about the certainty of impending Mueller indictments or bombshells. He flat-out lied that he and his staff had no prior contact with the whistleblower. He made up a version of the Trump call that didn't represent the transcript, and when called out, he begged off by claiming he was offering a "parody."

Tradition and protocol argue that the proper place for impeachment inquiries and investigations is the House Judiciary Committee. The hyperpartisan Schiff has hijacked that committee's historic role.

10) Precedent. The indiscriminate efforts to remove Trump over the past three years, when coupled with the latest impeachment gambit, have now set a precedent in which the out party can use impeachment as a tool to embarrass, threaten or seek to remove a sitting president and reverse an election. We are witnessing constitutional government dissipating before our eyes.
and the FBI/CIA/DOJ institutional respect
There are clearly still good people in both organizations. Hopefully removing the bad apples at the top will allow the barrel to become what we thought them to be.
Posted by Frank G 2019-11-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11141 views ]  Top

#1 None of this succeeds without active GOP cooperation.

We'll soon know what kind "two party system" we have.
Posted by charger 2019-11-13 00:26||   2019-11-13 00:26|| Front Page Top

#2 We are witnessing constitutional government dissipating before our eyes.

Sadly, VDH has it right in about ten words.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-11-13 01:18||   2019-11-13 01:18|| Front Page Top

#3 A classical historian sees clearly what the rest of us sleepwalkers don't: our Shitshow Clowns think they're a praetorian guard, here to save Rome from Caligula Deploribus.
Posted by Lex 2019-11-13 02:11||   2019-11-13 02:11|| Front Page Top

#4 This impeachment show trial is bad for the country. Stalin would be proud. If allowed to continue, the presidency will be weakened for every president hereafter, both Dem and Pub. Future POTUS' will be knee-capped and unable to conduct any foreign or domestic policies. There will be no balance of power between the branches of government.

The outcome of any future elections dissatisfy someone; that is the nature of elections. The impeachment will begin after the election and swing into full effect during the transition period.

I hope wiser heads prevail in the House other than Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler and some of the other Dems who hate Trump. Why do they hate Trump? Because he outsmarted them and upset their plans.
They hate him because he tends to be successful in managing the Executive branch of the government. They hate him because he has gone about breaking up a criminal cabal in government. They hate him because he, an elected President, has the audacity to challenge the authority of an unelected part of the government. I hope he crushes this bunch of criminals.
Posted by JohnQC 2019-11-13 08:50||   2019-11-13 08:50|| Front Page Top

#5 All that is subsequent, JohnQC. “Have you heard his accent?” Thy hate him because he is not part of the political in-crowd. He went to the wrong school, studied the analytical subject of economics instead of a verbal subject like history or poli-sci, and is not a career politician. And they hate him for not losing gracefully, as a Republican should.

He simply does not know his place.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-11-13 09:38||   2019-11-13 09:38|| Front Page Top

#6 It was clear the day after his election that the coup had started...
Posted by 49 Pan 2019-11-13 10:14||   2019-11-13 10:14|| Front Page Top

#7 @49Pan
Same as with Brexit.

It's like a twin, the bureaucracy decided they'd ignore what did not suit them.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2019-11-13 11:13||   2019-11-13 11:13|| Front Page Top

#8 The betrayal of the office of the President of the United States by the Washington establishment is quite revealing. Having swam in those waters some years back, I am not quite sure why I am now surprised.

Strange about those people, once you leave the beltway they seldom write, they seldom call. It's a world unto itself.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-11-13 12:36||   2019-11-13 12:36|| Front Page Top

#9 (1) Win in a landslide (2) Prosecute those involved in the Coup. Put an honest liberal like Dershwitz in charge to keep the circus away from the functioning government. (3) Convince Trump to not opine on the thing until it plays out.
Posted by rjschwarz 2019-11-13 14:46||   2019-11-13 14:46|| Front Page Top

#10 This is the second time the Democratic Party has tried to overthrow the United States government when free elections gave a result they didn't like. Are they going to get a chance at a third try?
Posted by Mercutio 2019-11-13 14:57||   2019-11-13 14:57|| Front Page Top

#11 A more lengthy version of VDH's editorial is here - National Review
Posted by Bobby 2019-11-13 18:08||   2019-11-13 18:08|| Front Page Top

#12 Stomp them at the ballot box.

Get out the vote. Volunteer. Make phone calls. Meet people at a coffee shop.

Make sure that the Silent Najority actually gets out and VOTES NEXT NOVEMBER.
Posted by Lex 2019-11-13 21:41||   2019-11-13 21:41|| Front Page Top

#13 * Majority
Posted by Lex 2019-11-13 21:42||   2019-11-13 21:42|| Front Page Top

17:48 49 Pan
17:38 Lord Garth
17:29 alanc
17:09 BrerRabbit
16:13 Pancho Poodle8452
16:08 Beavis
16:08 Lord Garth
15:52 Lord Garth
15:28 trailing wife
15:26 Pancho Poodle8452
15:26 trailing wife
14:34 Frank G
14:28 Melancholic
14:27 NoMoreBS
14:14 swksvolFF
14:12 swksvolFF
13:54 mossomo
13:51 mossomo
13:50 NoMoreBS
13:50 Abu Uluque
13:44 Abu Uluque
13:41 NoMoreBS
13:39 Abu Uluque
13:36 mossomo









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com