Article

2019-10-19 Home Front: Politix

State Department finds violations by 38 people in Clinton emails review

h/t Instapundit
The State Department identified nearly 600 security violations in its now-completed review of email records of dozens of former agency officials and aides to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The investigation, which covered the 33,000 emails Clinton provided for review, found 91 "valid violations" attributable to 38 individuals, some of whom may face disciplinary action. Another 497 violations could not be tied to any specific person.
James Comey's "No intent". Pfft. Defenestrate these f*ckers
A nine-page unclassified report was sent to Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is leading the congressional oversight of the security review, in a letter from Assistant Secretary of State for Legislative Affairs Mary Elizabeth Taylor dated Oct. 16.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-10-19 02:55|| || Front Page|| [7 views ] Top

#1 Note Senator Grassley's January 30 letter was answered October 16th. I think it was the same year, but Mary Elizabeth didn't say.

Posted by Bobby 2019-10-19 07:21|| 2019-10-19 07:21|| Front Page Top

#2 um. so 38 "individuals" did wrong to send the emails, but nothing about the one who received, stored and re-mailed them?

Posted by Mercutio 2019-10-19 08:54|| 2019-10-19 08:54|| Front Page Top

#3 SS, Pt. 140

Posted by Lex 2019-10-19 11:24|| 2019-10-19 11:24|| Front Page Top

#4 U.S. Code § 798.Disclosure of classified information
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

There have been people convicted and put in prison for less. The fact that she had an illegal server set up, and she tried to destroy evidence of a crime ought to be sufficient to show intent.

Posted by JohnQC 2019-10-19 12:06|| 2019-10-19 12:06|| Front Page Top

#5 That it was a Friday night news dump tells you everything about the mindset of the people at State. Will there be an criminal referral for these felony’s? Rule of law my ass....

Posted by NoMoreBS 2019-10-19 12:15|| 2019-10-19 12:15|| Front Page Top

#6 ...found "some instances" of classified information being "inappropriately introduced into an unclassified system in furtherance of expedience." But investigators uncovered "no persuasive evidence of systematic, deliberate mishandling of classified information."

Sorry to say thisi is my organization that did this investigation. How can you say TS material ended up on an Unclass system but it wasn't deliberate?? What else could it be but deliberate??

Posted by Bangkok Billy 2019-10-19 19:12|| 2019-10-19 19:12|| Front Page Top

#7 BB: "'Shut up!' they explained"

Posted by Frank G 2019-10-19 19:18|| 2019-10-19 19:18|| Front Page Top

#8 Sorry to say thisi is my organization that did this investigation. How can you say TS material ended up on an Unclass system but it wasn't deliberate?? What else could it be but deliberate?? Posted by Bangkok Billy

Things have chanced since Jimmy Mac and Tim.

Posted by Besoeker 2019-10-19 19:23|| 2019-10-19 19:23|| Front Page Top

02:32 Grom the Reflective
02:20 Besoeker
02:12 Besoeker
02:01 Besoeker
01:44 Besoeker
01:44 DarthVader
01:39 Besoeker
01:37 DarthVader
01:28 Grom the Reflective
01:16 Besoeker
00:05 Uleremp and Company7042