Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 04/23/2024 View Mon 04/22/2024 View Sun 04/21/2024 View Sat 04/20/2024 View Fri 04/19/2024 View Thu 04/18/2024 View Wed 04/17/2024
2019-09-04 Home Front: Culture Wars
Christine Blasey Ford's Attorney Said She Was Partly Motivated By Desire To Defend Roe V Wade
[Hot Air] There’s a new book out about the Kavanaugh confirmation called "Search and Destroy: Inside the Campaign Against Brett Kavanaugh." The Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard has seen some excerpts from the book and highlights one of them today. Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, spoke at a conference and suggested that Ford was motivated to come forward by her desire to put an asterisk next to Kavanaugh’s name should he later dismantle Roe v Wade:
In April this year, she spoke at the University of Baltimore’s 11th Feminist Legal Theory Conference titled "Applied Feminism and #MeToo." Lovelace secured a video of her address and provided a clip to Secrets...

Katz said:

"In the aftermath of these hearings, I believe that Christine’s testimony brought about more good than the harm misogynist Republicans caused by allowing Kavanaugh on the court. We were going to have a conservative [justice] ... elections have consequences, but he will always have an asterisk next to his name. When he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is, we know his character, and we know what motivates him, and that is important; it is important that we know, and that is part of what motivated Christine."

[The book’s author] explained, "Ford’s audience was not the Senate, as Katz had previously suggested, but the American people. If they could be persuaded that Justice Kavanaugh was a predator, then they might not accept a future ruling by the five Republican-appointed justices altering the right to obtain an abortion established by Roe v. Wade. Had the Senate understood Ford’s real motivation, as described by Katz, it might have appreciated more fully the pressure that ’organized forces’ were applying."

Of course, we don’t know exactly what Dr. Ford might have said that led her attorney to believe this was an accurate take on her views. Maybe this is Katz putting her own spin on things, after the fact. Maybe she’s trying to claim a moral victory in the face of an obvious defeat. That’s possible.

Posted by Besoeker 2019-09-04 01:56|| || Front Page|| [14 views ]  Top

#1 F---ing liar.

I gather that the slut has immunity from prosecution thanks to the Congressional exception, but she ought to be horsewhipped.

These disgusting lies against Kavanaugh must not be allowed to stand.

No one who participated in this national disgrace should be allowed to escape the harshest possible censure and public shaming.
Posted by Lex 2019-09-04 02:14||   2019-09-04 02:14|| Front Page Top

#2 Hindsight history retold.
Posted by Dale 2019-09-04 04:28||   2019-09-04 04:28|| Front Page Top

#3 ....Waitaminnit....

"If they could be persuaded that Justice Kavanaugh was a predator, then they might not accept a future ruling by the five Republican-appointed justices altering the right to obtain an abortion established by Roe v. Wade..."

...What do you mean, 'might not accept'? It's the Supreme Court, you fools, not the Dungeon Master for a Friday night game of D&D - you don't get to decide whether or not you 'accept' it, you DO and you go on.

Congratulations, folks, this is what we've come to after decades of legislating from the bench: if they think that a call might go the other way, they don't have to 'accept' it. (NOTE: does not apply to any decisions that we might not accept. Know your place, peasant.)

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2019-09-04 04:30||   2019-09-04 04:30|| Front Page Top

#4 But mostly by a desire to shine
Posted by g(r)omgoru PB 2019-09-04 05:02||   2019-09-04 05:02|| Front Page Top

#5 Lies in support of "the greater truth." The lefty lingua franca....
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-09-04 07:45||   2019-09-04 07:45|| Front Page Top

#6 What a surprise! IMO boodle and self enrichment at the expense of Kavanaugh was also a motive.
Posted by JohnQC 2019-09-04 07:55||   2019-09-04 07:55|| Front Page Top

#7 Her body language during confirmation testimony revealed Stage-4 moonbattery.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-09-04 08:56||   2019-09-04 08:56|| Front Page Top

#8 Her lies were so many and so transparent, they reeked to heaven.

She told absurd lies about her "trauma," including supposed fear of flying - even though she flew cross-country to D.C. for the circus hearings, and even though she routinely flies f---ing long-haul flights across the Pacific Ocean for her surfing vacations.

She lied about her / her hubby's separate Palo Alto home entrance for their renter - and concocted an absolutely ridiculous lie about how this separate address was actually an escape route to soothe her traumatized nerves.

Her high school reputation was as a slut with an early and frequent penchant for oral sex. Her lawyers and media flacks and Dem handlers bullied everyone around her to such an extent that these former classmates refused to publicly state what they privately acknowledged: if this liar had truly been traumatized as a schoolgirl, that event must have happened long before she ever met Kavanaugh because her sluttish behavior was consistent throughout her school days. College sorority sisters agreed she was a party girl with a drug habit.

According to her live-in boyfriend of nine years, she never mentioned anything remotely like a traumatic event. This ex- also testified under oath that he witnessed the nutjob coaching her FBI-applicant friend on how to pass a polygraph exam - in direct contradiction to her sworn statement that she never received or gave any training in how to game polygraphs.

This disgusting specimen needs to be publicly shamed and scorned.

Her filthy and outrageous lies must not be allowed to stand.
Posted by Lex 2019-09-04 09:40||   2019-09-04 09:40|| Front Page Top

#9 Well, yeah. That and the money.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-09-04 10:26||   2019-09-04 10:26|| Front Page Top

#10 Surprise = 0
Posted by Iblis 2019-09-04 10:46||   2019-09-04 10:46|| Front Page Top

#11 This means her motive to come forward was political, at least in part. In other words she came forward to create a political impression on all who heard her based on her political beliefs.
This sounds so like the politically motivated hoaxes that have occurred often at colleges, which have been used to provoke hatred of republicans that proved to be created by leftists.
That prominent democrats supported her is shameful to themselves and their party.
Posted by Daniel 2019-09-04 19:04||   2019-09-04 19:04|| Front Page Top

#12 She was put forward with the connivance of Chi-Com Spy-supporting Di-Fi
Posted by Frank G 2019-09-04 19:47||   2019-09-04 19:47|| Front Page Top

#13 That prominent democrats supported her is shameful to themselves and their party.

The Left has no shame. However, they're more than happy to heap it on others. It's all about power.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-09-04 20:38||   2019-09-04 20:38|| Front Page Top

12:51 M. Murcek
12:45 Grom the Reflective
12:44 trailing wife
12:26 mossomo
12:25 Grom the Reflective
12:20 Tom
12:19 SteveS
12:08 M. Murcek
12:04 Frank G
12:04 Whiskey Mike
11:17 SteveS
11:08 Abu Uluque
11:04 Abu Uluque
11:01 SteveS
10:58 49 Pan
10:57 49 Pan
10:52 Super Hose
10:52 49 Pan
10:49 49 Pan
10:49 49 Pan
10:48 Super Hose
10:46 Super Hose
10:43 Super Hose
10:40 Super Hose









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com