Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2019-08-07 Home Front: Politix
‘Flagrantly illegal.’ Trump sues California over new law targeting his tax returns
[SACBEE] President Donald Trump
...His ancestors didn't own any slaves...
, the Caliphornia, an impregnable bastion of the Democratic Party, Republican Party, and the national GOP joined together Tuesday to sue California over a new tax-return law Gov. Gavin Newsom signed last week.

The law requires Trump and other presidential candidates to release the last five years of their tax returns to get their names on the state’s 2020 primary ballot.

Trump has yet to weigh in on the issue himself. His personal attorney Jay Sekulow criticized "California’s attempt to circumvent the constitution."

"Today we have taken decisive action in federal court challenging California’s attempt to circumvent the U.S. Constitution," Sekulow said in a statement. "The issue of whether the president should release his federal tax returns was litigated in the 2016 election and the American people spoke. The effort to deny California voters the opportunity to cast a ballot for President Trump in 2020 will clearly fail. Legal scholars from across the political spectrum have roundly condemned this flagrantly illegal statute. We are confident the courts will as well."

Trump’s campaign filed its 15-page complaint in the U.S. Eastern District of California. Republican state politicians, the California Republican Party, and the Republican National Committee filed a similar 26-page lawsuit on Tuesday seeking an injunction.

The latest legal challenges announced Tuesday come days after the conservative group Judicial Watch filed for an injunction to stop the law in its tracks. Rocky de La Fuente, a California native and 2020 Republican presidential candidate, filed a similar complaint beforehand.
Rocky is a San Diego area crank
Trump argues in his lawsuit that the U.S. Constitution establishes a firm set of eligibility requirements related to age and citizenship. According to the lawsuit, "These are the exclusive qualifications for federal office."
The Constitution's also got that prohibition against bills of attainder.
The complaint from the Trump campaign filed Tuesday also calls the new law "a partisan effort" that is part of "the Democrats’ ongoing crusade to obtain the president’s federal tax returns in the hopes of finding something they can use to harm him politically."

California will argue it has administrative jurisdiction over its state ballots.

In a signing statement, Newsom said the Constitution "grants states the authority to determine how their electors are chosen, and California is well within its constitutional right to include this requirement."

Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who will defend California in court, said on Monday that the state had not yet been served with a complaint. While he declined to comment on the specifics of pending cases, he said he’d be ready for the lawsuit

"We’ll be ready to do what we need to do to defend California’s law and statutes," Becerra said.
Posted by Fred 2019-08-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ]  Top

#1 A one party system by 'any means necessary'. The mask is off.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-08-07 01:58||   2019-08-07 01:58|| Front Page Top

#2 Knowingly passing laws that are a)unconstitutional and b) are bills of attainder - sounds like grounds for impeachment (for the CA Dems) to me.
Posted by Raj 2019-08-07 09:13||   2019-08-07 09:13|| Front Page Top

#3 That'll never happen, Raj. Not in California. It's too late. And it doesn't matter whether the law is constitutional or not. The object is to harass and delay in any way possible, legal or otherwise.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-08-07 09:22||   2019-08-07 09:22|| Front Page Top

#4 I expect this to be struck down after a trip through a circuit court.

That being said, I also expect California and other loonybin states to secede after Trump wins 2020.
Posted by DarthVader 2019-08-07 09:40||   2019-08-07 09:40|| Front Page Top

#5 Darth, you say that like it's a bad thing.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2019-08-07 09:57||   2019-08-07 09:57|| Front Page Top

#6 ..some of California. There's the West Virginia precedent.

You know it only takes 2/3rds of the Senate to ratify or amend a treaty, say, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and return the 'offended' areas back to Mexico.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-08-07 12:19||   2019-08-07 12:19|| Front Page Top

17:38 Lord Garth
17:29 alanc
17:09 BrerRabbit
16:13 Pancho Poodle8452
16:08 Beavis
16:08 Lord Garth
15:52 Lord Garth
15:28 trailing wife
15:26 Pancho Poodle8452
15:26 trailing wife
14:34 Frank G
14:28 Melancholic
14:27 NoMoreBS
14:14 swksvolFF
14:12 swksvolFF
13:54 mossomo
13:51 mossomo
13:50 NoMoreBS
13:50 Abu Uluque
13:44 Abu Uluque
13:41 NoMoreBS
13:39 Abu Uluque
13:36 mossomo
13:36 swksvolFF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com