Article

2019-07-05 Home Front: Culture Wars

Abortion Might Not Cut Crime Rates After All

[Free Beacon] Using data from the rise and fall of communism in Romania, a new paper suggests that abortion's effect on crime is minimal, once its effect on population size is properly accounted for.

The paper, authored by economists Randi Hjalmarsson, Andreea Mitrut, and Cristian Pop-Eleches, looks at sudden changes in Romanian abortion law during and after the Ceaușescu regime. It shows that while overall numbers of crimes rose and fell in line with abortion, this effect vanishes when adjusting for the size of the population. This conclusion challenges prevailing explanations, including the idea that abortion reduces the number of "unwanted" children who might otherwise commit crimes.

The proposed link between abortion and crime has a long, and fraught, history. Back in 2001, economists John Donohue and Steven Levitt (the latter of Freakonomics fame) released a paper arguing that the legalization of abortion ‐ first in specific states, and then nationwide via Roe v. Wade ‐ drove the massive decline in crime from 1995 onwards, as children who would have been in their teens and early-to-mid 20s‐a high-crime age range‐simply were never born. They contended that this abortion effect accounts for up to 50 percent of the overall drop.

Donohue and Levitt argued that abortion affects crime through two mechanisms. One is cohort size ‐ if there are fewer kids, there will be fewer crimes in absolute terms. The other one, that the pair described as "far more interesting," is selection, i.e. "the possibility that abortion has a disproportionate effect on the births of those who are most at risk of engaging in criminal behavior."

Posted by Besoeker 2019-07-05 06:12|| || Front Page|| [14 views ] Top

#1 It's not about crime, it's about convenience, power, and government dependency. These services are necessary to ensure everyone remains on the urban plantation.

Posted by Besoeker 2019-07-05 06:16|| 2019-07-05 06:16|| Front Page Top

#2 Ever thought you are misapplying the principle? Maybe application of swift and predictable termination of criminal post-natal adult critters would alter behaviors just as effectively?

Posted by Procopius2k 2019-07-05 07:43|| 2019-07-05 07:43|| Front Page Top

#3 Not even a retroactive one?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-07-05 07:55|| 2019-07-05 07:55|| Front Page Top

#4 I swear these two have got to be the dumbest 'experts' ever. They should certainly have been aborted. That's like saying, 'Because young people indulge in more crime, having lesser young people means lesser crime.' Of course it does but so what ?

It's also incontrovertible truth that a decrease in some sections of the population will lead to an overall decrease in crime. I say, fight the abortion battle not in legislatures, but in classrooms, medical schools, churches, families and with counselors.

And let the 'pro-choice' imbeciles prove Darwin. They don't deserve to be mothers anyway. God knows their children don't deserve them.

Posted by Dron66046 2019-07-05 08:17|| 2019-07-05 08:17|| Front Page Top

#5 Given the racial-eugenics underpinnings of the abortion lobby, the idea that it's an anti-crime program is stunningly racist.

Posted by Iblis 2019-07-05 14:54|| 2019-07-05 14:54|| Front Page Top

20:13 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
20:03 M. Murcek
19:33 DarthVader
19:15 Procopius2k
18:46 Spomonter+Speaking+for+Boskone8031
18:28 M. Murcek
18:28 Ululating Platypus
18:19 Rex Mundi
18:17 swksvolFF
18:12 Rex Mundi
18:11 Ululating Platypus
17:53 jpal
17:52 Frank G
17:44 Huputch Hatrack4765
17:39 jpal
17:38 ed in texas
17:23 jpal
17:00 Deacon+Blues
17:00 trailing wife
16:51 Deacon+Blues
16:44 Gleremble+Bucket3559
16:26 Procopius2k
16:24 Procopius2k
16:17 Procopius2k