Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2019-06-20 Great White North
‘Fascist and tyrannical' or cultural preservation? Quebec passes controversial religious ban
[RT] Lawmakers in the Canadian province of Quebec have adopted a law banning public service employees from wearing religious symbols. Critics and advocates both see it as an attempt of the Francophone region to preserve its identity.

Bill 21 (Loi 21) was passed by a vote of 73-35 in the National Assembly on Sunday. It bars civil servants “in positions of authority” – such as teachers, police, and government lawyers – from wearing religious symbols. This includes Christian crucifixes, Muslim headscarves, Sikh turbans and Jewish yarmulkes, for instance.
Yarmulke wearers can easily move to baseball caps, as some community leaders have recommended in Germany and France — possibly elsewhere as well. It’s about covering, not the cover. The hijab could easily be replaced by a kerchief tied over the hair, if wearing it were not exactly the political statement it is accused of being.
Muslim women wearing the full face veil (burqa) will be directly affected by the provision requiring people giving or receiving government services to uncover their faces, for purposes of security or confirming identity.

Lawmakers also approved Bill 9, which imposes new French language and values tests for prospective immigrants intended to “protect Quebec identity.”

“Look, we can talk semantics all day long. You know and I know what this is all about,” legal and media analyst Lionel told RT, suggesting that the seemingly secular statute stood as a proxy for anti-immigrant sentiment.

“I do believe there is a mixture of this attempt to preserve the uniqueness of that province… and trying to ‘dress’ a certain immigration situation,” Antonio Rossini, professor at the University of Windsor in neighboring Ontario, agreed. “I doubt that this would have popped up in a different historical context.”

Rossini told RT that many Canadians tend to wear religious symbols not as a show of their faith, but as a statement about their identity and origin.
Posted by Skidmark 2019-06-20 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11135 views ]  Top

#1 "Rossini told RT that many Canadians tend to wear religious symbols not as a show of their faith, but as a statement about their identity and origin."

I've been to Canada. I've never seen a policeman wear any such things. I doubt Rossini has either.
Posted by lord garth 2019-06-20 00:33||   2019-06-20 00:33|| Front Page Top

#2 What thy need is stricter law enforcement in immigrant settlements, zero tolerance of 'personal and mob laws' , and police protection of women in case of voluntary conversion to atheism, christianity, buddhism, satanism, whatever.
Posted by Dron66046 2019-06-20 02:21||   2019-06-20 02:21|| Front Page Top

#3 'personal and mob laws'

Referring to sharia?
Posted by Woodrow 2019-06-20 06:23||   2019-06-20 06:23|| Front Page Top

#4 They call them 'personal laws' and gradually insinuate them into daily life. They are the necessary step towardsSharia. Muslim personal laws are fluid enough to flex and deform, appear as only moral precepts or mere clan rituals, allowing for their enactment into local laws and gradually into legislation, because ultimately democracy's a vote-based enterprise for the legislator. Unknown to most people, taquiya includes the concept of legal islamism. Islamists plod for decades lobbying with a liberal or symp with foresight defunct enough to accommodate their shit. And before you know it, you have sharia zones.

It starts with stuff like " It is a valued custom within our particular community for girls to be engaged at 15. Don't worry it's not marriage yet..." Before you know it you have child rape.

Or, " We always gather at such and such spot at this time of day for whatever..." Soon, there's a 'holy zone' where even your citizens can't walk around uncovered.

Or, "we believe girls should not wear scent and go out with open hair, Djinns..." next comes a stoning or honour killing explained as exorcism.
Posted by Dron66046 2019-06-20 07:53||   2019-06-20 07:53|| Front Page Top

#5 The government can be the only accepted religion. All others must be dispatched with extreme prejudice.
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-06-20 09:30||   2019-06-20 09:30|| Front Page Top

#6 taquiya includes the concept of legal islamism.

The soft jihad of the law, in contrast to the hard jihad of the sword that comes later. Then there’s the fun jihad of love and rape, which isn’t officially listed anywhere, but in certain precincts is avidly practiced
Posted by trailing wife 2019-06-20 09:34||   2019-06-20 09:34|| Front Page Top

#7 Rhetorical question. Everyone on the Burg knows the process of cultural jihad. Referring to fundamentalist sharia by any other terms...
Posted by Woodrow 2019-06-20 11:57||   2019-06-20 11:57|| Front Page Top

#8 I know you know. I'm just... venting.☻
Posted by Dron66046 2019-06-20 12:10||   2019-06-20 12:10|| Front Page Top

#9 Yes, yes, there will be no crucifixes or yarmulkes. After a kabuki delay an "exception" will be made for muzz veils. In the mean time all third grade students will be memorizing the hadiths (spit) no opt-outs allowed.
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-06-20 14:38||   2019-06-20 14:38|| Front Page Top

#10 I was going to comment on the irony of "cultural preservation" that forbids wearing rosaries in Catholic Quebec, but when I went to look up the numbers it turns out not to be so ironic. Not many practicing Catholics left...
Posted by james  2019-06-20 15:28|| http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com  2019-06-20 15:28|| Front Page Top

#11 Restating the obvious is not necessarily a bad thing. Not everybody knows what everybody else knows. I am forever being startled to discover yet another area of ignorance, especially here. I had not, for instance, despite knowing about the soft sharia of the law, really thought through what the process looks like on the ground. Nor had I thought in terms of the efficient cultural jihad rather than the poetic/rhetoric soft jihad of the law. So I have my learning for today, with thanks.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-06-20 15:42||   2019-06-20 15:42|| Front Page Top

11:40 swksvolFF
11:11 HeavyG
11:10 Angstrom
11:07 HeavyG
11:07 Angstrom
11:06 DarthVader
11:05 HeavyG
10:58 alanc
09:43 Mullah Richard
09:27 Warthog
09:11 Mercutio
09:07 AlmostAnonymous5839
08:52 Matt
08:24 Matt
08:20 SteveS
07:43 Procopius2k
07:42 BrerRabbit
07:42 Procopius2k
07:39 Procopius2k
07:36 Procopius2k
07:35 Procopius2k
07:34 trailing wife
07:31 Procopius2k
07:30 NN2N1









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com