Article

2019-06-10 Bangladesh

PM Hasina accuses Myanmar of being reluctant in taking Rohingyas back

[Dhaka Tribune] Prime Minister ~~the loathesome~~ Sheikh Hasina

...Bangla dynastic politician and current Prime Minister of Bangladesh. She has been the President of the Bangla Awami League since the Lower Paleolithic. She is the eldest of five children of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the founding father of Bangla. Her party defeated the BNP-led Four-Party Alliance in the 2008 parliamentary elections. She has once before held the office, from 1996 to 2001, when she was defeated in a landslide. She and the head of the BNP, Khaleda Zia show such blind animosity toward each other that they are known as the Battling Begums..
has accused Myanmar of being reluctant in repatriating over a million Rohingya nationals defying their promise and feared that some international aid agencies to tend to keep the crisis alive.

"The problem lies with Myanmar as they don’t want to take back the Rohingyas by any means though Naypyidaw
...generally translated as royal capital, seat of the king or abode of kings because the general in charge had a massive ego. It was founded in 2002 because Rangoon was worn out. Traditionally, Naypyidaw was used as a suffix to the names of royal capitals, such as Mandalay, which was called Yadanabon Naypyidaw in Burmese...
signed an agreement with Bangladesh promising to repatriate them," she said while briefing media at her residence Ganabhaban on Sunday.

The premier simultaneously feared that some international aid and voluntary agencies too were unwilling to resolve the crisis saying: "They never want the refugees to return their home."

"This is what I see," Sheikh Hasina told the presser, a day after her return home following her tri-nation tour to Japan, Soddy Arabia
...a kingdom taking up the bulk of the Arabian peninsula. Its primary economic activity involves exporting oil and soaking Islamic rubes on the annual hajj pilgrimage. The country supports a large number of princes in whatcha might call princely splendor. When the oil runs out the rest of the world is going to kick sand in the Soddy national face...
and Finland, reports BSS.

Asked for comments about a perception that three major countries ‐ China, Japan and India ‐ took Myanmar’s side in the crisis, the premier said Dhaka separately held talks with these countries where all of them acknowledged Rohingyas as Myanmar nationals and agreed that they should return there.

"(But) they (three countries) simultaneously argued that if all of them confront Myanmar over the issue, then who will be there to convince them (Naypyidaw)," she said.

Posted by Fred 2019-06-10 00:00|| || Front Page|| [16 views ] Top
File under: Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army

#1 The rohingya are practically like the creatures in 'aliens'. Sure, they have babies and women and for publicity the cameras can make them look innocent and all. But the truth is, they're a vicious, tribal, insane community of inbreds completely radicalized and driven to mass murder and mayhem.

The global media agenda to 'humanize' them is based only on muslim activists and know-nothing bleeding hearts who they put up the victim act for. Why would countries that typically tolerate crime and terrorism on a daily basis selectively throw out these bastards ? A lady like Suu Kyi, known for her patience and perseverance wanted their removal, by buddhists no less. They're the Myanmar cousins of the Chinese Uighur, which are in aspect the same as them. Hence the big enforcement on Xinjiang by the CCP. If they could escape world ridicule, these nations would simply annihilate these communities.

Posted by Dron66046 2019-06-10 05:41|| 2019-06-10 05:41|| Front Page Top

#2 Back? Shouldnt they be asking Bangladesh that not Burma?

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2019-06-10 05:50|| 2019-06-10 05:50|| Front Page Top

#3 The muzz madness
won't end
Before the Western blindness
does.

Burma Shave

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-06-10 06:08|| 2019-06-10 06:08|| Front Page Top

#4 I wouldn’t want them back either.

Posted by Uleck Spererong9442 2019-06-10 06:46|| 2019-06-10 06:46|| Front Page Top

#5 But the truth is, they're a vicious, tribal, insane community of inbreds completely radicalized and driven to mass murder and mayhem.

And this is different from all other Muslims, how?

Posted by AlanC 2019-06-10 07:16|| 2019-06-10 07:16|| Front Page Top

#6 I thought and thought, Alan. The answer is, not much.

These are particularly vile though. Add a history of cannibal tribalism to black magic and multiply by an islamic coefficient of two.

Posted by Dron66046 2019-06-10 07:55|| 2019-06-10 07:55|| Front Page Top

#7 An October 2012 report:
Oo Hla Saw blamed local authorities for failing to heed rumors of impending violence, and Islamist radicals for inflaming tensions. For many Rakhines, he adds, the term Rohingya has jihadist overtones associated with the "Mujahid," autonomy-seeking rebels in northern Rakhine State from 1949 to 1961, who called themselves ethnic Rohingya. (Independent historians say the rebels did popularize the term "Rohingya," but cite a few references to it since the 18th century.)
Even today, Oo Hla Saw said, the Rohingya want "to set up an autonomous Islamic community. They are systematically scheming to do that."

Posted by Chereting Pelosi1889 2019-06-10 08:23|| 2019-06-10 08:23|| Front Page Top

16:25 borgboy
16:20 alanc
16:17 alanc
15:12 Skidmark
15:10 Skidmark
15:08 Tom
15:02 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
14:23 Unung the Furry2677
14:11 Unung the Furry2677
14:06 Unung the Furry2677
13:29 DarthVader
13:21 Airandee
13:19 Airandee
13:15 swksvolFF
13:06 swksvolFF
13:04 NoMoreBS
12:58 Remoteman
12:52 NoMoreBS
12:49 Frank G
12:35 mossomo
12:35 Cesare
12:30 swksvolFF
12:21 swksvolFF
12:19 swksvolFF