Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/17/2024 View Thu 05/16/2024 View Wed 05/15/2024 View Tue 05/14/2024 View Mon 05/13/2024 View Sun 05/12/2024 View Sat 05/11/2024
2019-01-17 -Short Attention Span Theater-
Learning from the Folly of Middle Eastern Regime Change
[The National Interest] The naïve assumption of interventionists that U.S.-orchestrated forcible regime change would usher in new, democratic political systems was evident in Iraq, Libya and Syria.

The hostile reaction among most members of Washington’s political and media elites to President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria involves several factors. One is simply a knee-jerk (largely partisan) rejection of any policy Trump proposes on any issue, foreign or domestic. Another is policy inertia that makes it difficult to dislodge a military commitment once undertaken. The United States still has military forces in such places as Germany, Japan and South Korea decades after the original rationales disappeared. Such inertia also helps account for the resistance to Trump’s planned troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. Still another element in the case of Syria policy is the lobbying effort by foreign powers (primarily Israel and Saudi Arabia) determined to keep the United States heavily engaged in the Middle East.

There is one other reason for the entrenched resistance to ending the Syria mission: a reluctance to acknowledge the failure of any high-profile U.S. foreign-policy venture, regardless of the accumulating evidence. That unhealthy attitude goes back at least as far as the Vietnam War. The survival (and increasingly likely victory) of Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad is a graphic reminder that Washington’s strategy of forcibly ousting targeted secular dictators in the greater Middle East (what George W. Bush described as America’s “freedom agenda”) has been a fiasco. The architects of and cheerleaders for Washington’s regime change crusades stubbornly resist acknowledging how badly their cherished policy has flopped. In all three cases, though, it is clear that U.S. policy made already bad situations much worse.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-01-17 04:10|| || Front Page|| [16 views ]  Top

#1 There is one other reason for the entrenched resistance to ending the Syria mission: a reluctance to acknowledge the failure of any high-profile U.S. foreign-policy venture, regardless of the accumulating evidence.

Soetoro AFG Policy, Benghazi attack, and 'Iran nuclear deal' all classic examples. Domestic examples include 'Affordable Care Act' and 'Fast & Furious.'
Posted by Besoeker 2019-01-17 07:30||   2019-01-17 07:30|| Front Page Top

#2 It's amusing to me how many knee-jerk anti-war types turned on a dime as soon as Trump said he'd get us out of a war or two.

I still haven't seen Code Pink protesting in support of Trump...
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-01-17 12:32||   2019-01-17 12:32|| Front Page Top

05:18 Besoeker
05:08 Whiskey Mike
05:06 Besoeker
05:00 Skidmark
04:54 Whiskey Mike
04:52 Besoeker
04:50 Skidmark
04:50 Besoeker
04:49 Skidmark
04:42 Skidmark
04:32 Besoeker
04:04 Besoeker
03:45 Besoeker
03:21 Besoeker
03:19 Grom the reflective
01:46 Grom the reflective
01:28 Grom the reflective
01:26 Grom the reflective
01:24 Grom the reflective
01:22 Grom the reflective
01:20 Grom the reflective
01:15 Raj
00:50 Raj
00:45 Raj









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com