|
2019-01-15 -Land of the Free
|
|
Federalist Update - Why Banning Abortion Will Save Millions More Lives Than Banning Guns
|
 [The Federalist] Over the weekend there was a massive march in Washington and other cities to demand new laws, ostensibly on behalf of innocent lives being endangered. That sounds like another giant protest march that takes place once a year in Washington, except this one is being reported coast-to-coast, buoyed by celebrity endorsements, and hailed as the dawn of a revolution, rather than being studiously ignored or downplayed.
It should be obvious that I’m speaking of the March for Our Lives and the March for Life, two ostensibly similar marches advocating ostensibly similar views. Yet comparing the two positions reveals illuminating fundamental differences.
Ownership Versus Action
Of course the most obvious distinction is in the subject matter: one favors limiting or ending gun owners, the other limiting or ending abortion. Let’s consider the two subjects, for here the crux of the matter rests.
Gun rights deal with a person’s right to own a particular tool for a particular purpose. Put briefly, a gun is a weapon; weapons are used in fighting. People want to own guns so if they ever need to fight to defend themselves, their families, or their rights, they can do so effectively. There are obvious and legitimate reasons why they would want this, ranging from violent attackers to civil unrest.
But, although they have legitimate uses, guns by nature are open to abuse. They allow a person with evil intent to inflict more damage than he would otherwise. Gun-control advocates argue the potential for abuse is greater than the legitimate need for private firearms, at least with regards to certain weapons. In other words, gun control advocates wish to limit access to guns in order to limit their potential for abuse.
Abortion rights deal with a person’s right to do or have done a particular procedure. This procedure, by definition, destroys a human life: specifically the human life the people in question created by having intercourse, whether consensually or violently. They desire this because, to one degree or another, the life to be destroyed is unwanted or inconvenient and was not intended to be created. 
|
Posted by Besoeker 2019-01-15 07:42||
||
Front Page|| [11 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Crusoling de Medici2683 2019-01-15 13:05||
2019-01-15 13:05||
Front Page
Top
|
|
06:34 Airandee
06:12 Fairbanks
06:12 Besoeker
05:51 Ululating Platypus
05:16 Frank G
05:13 Frank G
03:22 Grom the Reflective
03:20 Grom the Reflective
03:14 Grom the Reflective
03:13 Grom the Reflective
03:12 Grom the Reflective
01:55 badanov
01:19 Grom the Reflective
00:35 Skidmark
00:33 Skidmark
00:27 Skidmark
00:25 Skidmark
|
