Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/30/2025 View Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025
2018-11-22 Home Front: Politix
Ginsburg Gambled on Hillary - and Lost
From April, 2017, but seems relevant again, given the fake news about RBG retiring.
[The Hill] The confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the United States Supreme Court represents a huge political victory for Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who gambled on blocking the nomination of Merrick Garland in the hopes of a GOP electoral victory.

It may also have been an equally huge loss for the of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who ignored increasing calls for her retirement during the Obama administration to avoid the prospect of the flipping of her seat from a liberal to a conservative member. That gamble ‐ whatever calculation ‐ could now cost a sweeping number of key cases hanging by a 5-4 margin, including much of the precedent built around Roe v. Wade, if not an outright overturning of that decision.Now Ginsburg’s gamble on Hillary Clinton being elected could have sweeping impact on precedent that she played a major role in creating. With the elimination of the filibuster, the next nominee is hardly likely to be nuanced. Without the filibuster, Republicans have no excuse to compromise on a moderate. There is nothing standing in the way to appointing someone who is openly opposed to cases like Roe v. Wade. There is no plausible deniability based on the need to get to 60. In other words, the market has changed and the stock went bust.

From the use of race in college admissions to abortion to police powers, the GOP could achieve objectives in this administration that have eluded Republican presidents for over six decades. It is not clear if Ginsberg was betting more heavily on herself or Hillary, but many may conclude that the bet was reckless given the stakes on the table. For a few years on the Court, Ginsburg risked Trump "running the table" and the odds now favor precisely such a result.
But Roberts assures us they aren't political. Just unbiased Beacons of Justice. No Obama judges, no Clinton judges, ....
Posted by Bobby 2018-11-22 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11133 views ]  Top

#1 Why do I keep having a mental image of a black suit of hi-tech armor:
Darth Ruth: "Hssss* Progressives will bring peace and order to the United States! *Hsss*""
Posted by magpie 2018-11-22 02:24||   2018-11-22 02:24|| Front Page Top

#2 With Roberts on the court I consider the court to be evenly split 4-4-1. Ginsburg still needs replaced.
Posted by Airandee  2018-11-22 03:02||   2018-11-22 03:02|| Front Page Top

#3 What does your constitution say about zombies serving on SCOTUS?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2018-11-22 06:59||   2018-11-22 06:59|| Front Page Top

#4 Maybe they'll replace her with an RBGbot and we'll never even know.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2018-11-22 12:22||   2018-11-22 12:22|| Front Page Top

#5 Covertly make her office a Faraday cage
Posted by Frank G 2018-11-22 12:25||   2018-11-22 12:25|| Front Page Top

08:53 Gleng Whaick2262
08:37 ed in texas
08:30 Besoeker
08:30 Besoeker
08:12 Procopius2k
08:10 Procopius2k
07:54 Grom the Affective
06:54 Richard Aubrey
06:49 MikeKozlowski
06:48 MikeKozlowski
06:46 Richard Aubrey
06:46 MikeKozlowski
06:44 Richard Aubrey
06:34 NN2N1
06:33 Grom the Affective
06:30 NN2N1
06:23 Grom the Affective
06:16 NN2N1
06:09 NN2N1
05:39 Whiskey Mike
05:37 Whiskey Mike
05:29 Whiskey Mike
05:25 Whiskey Mike
05:23 Whiskey Mike









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com